Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 17 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Wehr, Propsteigebäude (2014-10-01 832).JPG[edit]

  • Nomination House of provost at Wehr (Eifel), Germany, built in 1730 -- Spurzem 20:26, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:37, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose Clearly visible magenta CA and bottom left untilting leftover. This is again a remarkable careless review. --Cccefalon 04:11, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 Oppose Sorry Spurzem,effectively I wrong.So Cccefalon you can't tell me that I was wrong again,I don't make mistakes often.--Livioandronico2013 09:52, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 Comment Ah, that was probably a misunderstanding: I saw a whole bunch of questionable reviews that morning. It was a general remark, not a remark related to you. --Cccefalon 10:15, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
OK! But at Livioandronico2013: I were courageous enough to stand to my vote. ;-) -- Spurzem 22:07, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
@Spurzem:it also takes courage to admit their mistakes, in this case, I admit that I was wrong and I had a quick look, this is not to be disrespectful, just be objective, greetings Clin --Livioandronico2013 23:06, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Please look now. -- Spurzem 16:41, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --LC-de 21:06, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Boletus_edulis_LC0371.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Penny Bun (Boletus edulis), Falkenau, Germany --LC-de 11:53, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 12:32, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blown out sky --Cccefalon 03:57, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ccc. Mattbuck 18:40, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --LC-de 20:57, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Tea garden at Sripur (1).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Tea garden at Sripur in Sylhet --Moheen Reeyad 11:29, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Blurred. Magenta chromatic aberrations. --Cccefalon 12:38, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Why decline? The CAs are minimal und should be correctable. Pleas discuss. -- Spurzem 15:51, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I don't really mind the CAs, but it lacks sharpness at full resolution. --El Grafo 11:25, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --LC-de 20:51, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Patenga sea beach 2012.09.06 (3).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Sunset at Patenga sea beach, Chittagong --Moheen Reeyad 11:21, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Noise, chromatic noise,a rtefacts. Ships not sharp enough. --Cccefalon 12:32, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Chromatic noise is minimal. For me the ships are sharp enough. Pleas discuss. -- Spurzem 16:58, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, too much noise, especially at the horizon where the ships are. Looks ok at article size, but not at QI size --Generic1139 13:55, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, too much chromatic noise, unacceptable to QI. Poor detail IMO. --Lmbuga 18:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --LC-de 20:49, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Hl Bartholomäus (Übersaxen) 1.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hl Bartholomäus (Übersaxen) --Böhringer 05:50, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline --Cccefalon 06:27, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
    i vote photos and this ist good. --Ralf Roletschek 21:15, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose Unsharp --Uoaei1 06:07, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharp enough. --Steindy 22:20, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Low JPEG quality, perspective issues. Also I swear I declined this exact image earlier today on one of the daily sections. Mattbuck 18:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • weak  Support: it's not super crisp, but just enough. --MB-one 13:32, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough to QI IMO, sorry--Lmbuga 16:59, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as for lmbuga -- Smial 19:05, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --LC-de 14:27, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

File:La_Fornarina_di_Raffaello_Sanzio.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The Portrait of a Young Woman (also known as La fornarina) is a painting by the Italian High Renaissance master Raphael, made between 1518 and 1520. --Livioandronico2013 20:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Wrong white balance. --Yann 13:46, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
    Ok,now? Thanks--Livioandronico2013 16:58, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
No. See [1] as an example. Yann 15:57, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Yes but is too dark,it's impossible see the datails --Livioandronico2013 16:03, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
It is meant to be like this. Regards, Yann 09:32, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Ok Yann last chance --Livioandronico2013 13:17, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok for me.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Don't QIs have to be the work of a Wikimedian? Jakec 18:26, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 Comment Sure, but Livio does not claims that he painted it. Same situation that you don't need to be the architect when you sent a photo of a church to QIC. --Cccefalon 07:08, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose -- Very poor quality: artifacts everywhere, wrong colors -- Alvesgaspar 21:48, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per gaspar. --A.Savin 09:41, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --LC-de 14:25, 13 October 2014 (UTC)