Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 16 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Potroit_of_Rhesus_Macaque_at_Swayambhunath_Stupa.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Monkey at Monkey Temple (Swyambhunath) --Nabin K. Sapkota 07:53, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Is that a cultural heritage? please, add proper categories (specially the species) --Poco a poco 08:30, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done- Fixed --Nabin K. Sapkota 09:08, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Question What monkey species? --Poco a poco 19:43, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done - Fixed the issues --Nabin K. Sapkota 15:52, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:11, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality --Nerve net 16:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 19:28, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

File:2017_Nissan_LEAF_(ZE0_MY17)_hatchback_(2018-11-02)_01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination 2017 Nissan LEAF (ZE0 MY17) hatchback. Very rare on our roads in Australia, these do not sell well. Photographed in Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia. --EurovisionNim 02:22, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Good picture in general, but I don't think it sufficient for QI. CA is a problem in the background and under the car, it also a quite grainy and compressed. Sorry Nim. --Vauxford 22:53, 10 November 2018 (UTC)  Support Having another look, it overall look fine for QI, this is the first time I evaluated an image on here so I might've been over picky. --Vauxford (talk) 23:59, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support On this crappy monitor the image looks absolutely o.k. for QI. --Granada 08:46, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Looks quite acceptable for a QI to me. Slightly tilted, though. @Vauxford: I can't see the CA, could you mark it on the image? --Basotxerri 09:18, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 12:38, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Nothing wrong with it. --MB-one 17:01, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support The headlights are a bit too bright but that for example is no reason to decline. Good quality for me. -- Spurzem 19:58, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 19:27, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Independence_museum_(Copy).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Museum of Independence situated in Dhaka, Bangladesh. By User:Pallabkabir --RockyMasum 15:14, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Syed07 08:02, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. IMO too noisy and perspective not corrected. Not sure about the highlights either. --Basotxerri 09:10, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Basotxerri --Armenak Margarian 06:49, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 19:27, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

File:2017-11-02_(363)_Ruine_at_Jakobskogel_at_Rax,_Austria.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ruine at Jakobskogel at Rax, Austria.--GT1976 05:06, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Perspective, CAs, lens flare. --Basotxerri 09:13, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Baso.--Peulle 11:30, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 19:26, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

File:বাইতুল_আমান_জামে_মসজিদ_10.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Guthia Mosque. By User:Amdadtanim --RockyMasum 11:44, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Syed07 15:56, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Perspective, tilted, oversharpened, posterisation in the sky. --Basotxerri 09:56, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Basotxerri. It's clear as day.--Peulle 11:29, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 19:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

File:2018-08-29_(173)_Seehütte_at_Rax,_Austria.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Seehütte at Rax, Austria.--GT1976 06:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Perspective. --Basotxerri 21:08, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Picture needs a minimal rotation (tilt), so the building will looks more natural --Nerve net 08:48, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 19:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Ayuntamiento,_Ciudad_del_Cabo,_Sudáfrica,_2018-07-19,_DD_06-07_PAN.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Cape Town City Hall, South Africa --Poco a poco 16:01, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:24, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Seriously, with so much distortion? --A.Savin 17:36, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment - Poco, you need to explain the distortion in your file description. Only then would I vote in support. I'd have to oppose this file without a disclaimer. -- Ikan Kekek 07:12, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
    I added some more info --Poco a poco 18:41, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks.  Support - Good quality on this basis. -- Ikan Kekek 07:19, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Somehow I don't get it? Either the photo is QI or it is not. Why should it depend on a description? And do you sincerely think that this heavy cushion distortion is visible in reality? Even without knowing this place, I really don't think so, and QI guidelines disallow pictures that look faked (COM:IG: Manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable) @Ikan Kekek: ? --A.Savin 12:40, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  • I think that section of com:ig calls for interpretation based on context. I don't have time to discuss it further right now, but please start a discussion at that policy page's talk page about explicitly mentioned cylindrical projections and such and whether they can be acceptable at QIC. Ikan Kekek 15:56, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 12:45, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
    Wenn es um Verzerrungen geht, sind Sie doch immer einer der Ersten, der "oppose" sagt, und jetzt das? Stammtisch Kumpanei? Ihnen ist ja wirklich nicht zu helfen. --A.Savin 12:54, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment - whats going on? You guys address each other quite formally. I am not a fan of heavy distorsion correcting and would rather leave some obvious distorsions in the picture. But in this case I would at least try to make the lines on the left and right edges vertical (the outer walls of the building). Look at the windows of the neighbouring buildings. Is that possible? -- DerFussi 07:34, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
    Just for the record, I am not requesting a correction of distortion, because the horizontal lines are obviously not to resque, no matter what happens with vertical lines. I'm just convinced that this picture is not QI. (May be a case for VI though) --A.Savin 13:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
    The horizontal lines are absolutely ok. this kind of perspective is absolutely ok to me and would not be any reason to decline a picture. I like it anyway. Just the slight vertical distorsions at the both edges are a bit disturbung, because the windows are cut and I always look at it. -- DerFussi 19:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  OpposeToo noisy IMO.--Ermell 07:48, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 19:24, 15 November 2018 (UTC)