Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 28 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:19-01-19-Chișinău_RRK0190.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Chișinău, Moldawien, duty-free am Flugplatz --Ralf Roletschek 05:48, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --SH6188 12:24, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Shake. --A.Savin 22:12, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - I agree with A.Savin - in this kind of panorama, we should be able to view it at full size, and when I do, nothing is sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 02:39, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:34, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Victoria,_BC_-_Swans_Hotel_(Scott_Building)_pano_01_(20396318108).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Swans Hotel (Scott Building), Victoria, British Columbia (by Jmabel) --Another Believer 00:05, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:56, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, there are still stitching errors at least on the street that needs fixing first. --W.carter 12:00, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per W.carter, --Cvmontuy 21:19, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 21:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Startech,_GIMS_2019,_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(GIMS0664).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Aston Martin Vantage by Startech at Geneva International Motor Show 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 07:13, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Stoxastikos 09:47, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Only front wheel and one headlight are sharp, nothing else. Also disturbing background and agein unsufficiant lighting. I will never understand why all these exhibition and museum photos with creepy spotlight illumination should be quality images. Isn't "VI" enough for an award? --Smial 10:34, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Smial. The gesticulating man behind the car is really distracting, and not in a good way, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 04:52, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Smial, --Cvmontuy 21:20, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 21:13, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Hamrafjället_August_2018_17.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hamrafjället. --ArildV 04:42, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 06:55, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry, but I disagree. Focus is deliberately on the foreground. --ArildV 15:16, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose not very sharp.--Fischer.H 17:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support I'm not sure why the focus is on the foreground but it's OK for me. --Podzemnik 20:42, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Never thought about it until now, but facus on the foreground makes sense, as there's the stuff up close.--Tobias ToMar Maier 14:49, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support A somewhat difficult case. I would have preferred either continuous sharpness from the foreground to the background or stronger blur in the background. But that's a question of composition, imho all other QI criteria are met. --Smial 09:37, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support as Smial. --Ralf Roletschek 10:08, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose unfavorable DOF --Milseburg 17:07, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support --Moroder 09:04, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per Smial. --Aristeas 07:56, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)