Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 25 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Greenfinch_(Chloris_chloris_aurantiiventris)_Extremadura.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Greenfinch (Chloris chloris aurantiiventris) --Charlesjsharp 13:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:39, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Below 2 MP. --Steindy 23:38, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Correct. Speedy decline. -- Ikan Kekek 07:43, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Stephaniter_Weiher-20220515-RM-164823.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Stephaniter Weiher in the FFH area Mooweiher in the Aischgrund --Ermell 08:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:44, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sure, some algae and water, sharpness is ok. I am missing the "Moorweiher" from photo description. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 22:18, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO OK --XRay 07:43, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Perfectly fine. I don't understand the problem. -- Ikan Kekek 19:22, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Bociany_nad_polem_rzepaku_pod_Truskolasami,_20220515_0840_5910.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination White storks over rapeseed fields near Truskolasy, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship --Jakubhal 03:46, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose Sharpness missing even if a canola field is hard work for a camera. Sorry. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 21:41, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The dominant foreground is out of focus. --Smial 23:58, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC)