Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 22 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Altarm der Döllau (12).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Lamium maculatum --Verum 19:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality, very noisy --A.Savin 00:56, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment @A.Savin I tried to make better --Verum 09:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 19:59, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Anthony_Jung.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Anthony Jung bei der Aufstiegsfeier RB Leipzig 2016 --Wikijunkie 11:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, sorry --A.Savin 00:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsharp --Tsungam 09:54, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 18:44, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Bert_-_Mary_Poppins_-_20150805_17h50_(11035).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Bert in Mary Poppins in the Disney Magic On Parade at Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 18:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment This is a really hard call. The man's face is sharp and clear, the lighting is good and composition fair also. But those hands are really disturbing, so I'm genuinely not sure if it should be a QI. I would like to hear other people's opinion. Possibly take the image to CR? --Peulle 11:10, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't find the hands disturbing, good overall quality --Tsungam 09:55, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Kopfschüttel --Hubertl 14:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 22:22, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Confucius_Temple,_Dacheng_Hall,_Chunghua_(Taiwan).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Dacheng Hall of the Chunghua Confucius Temple, Taiwan. --Mk2010 12:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Xicotencatl 18:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I do not agree. Image needs perspective correction. --Halavar 19:23, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done I have uploaded a new version with perspective correction.--Mk2010 01:43, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good perspective, also sharp enough for a Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok, good now. Can pass as QI. --Halavar 10:13, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Three redlink categories in not-standard language. --Cccefalon 10:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done I have removed the redlink categories (I didn't know that having non-standard language in the categories will disqualify an image from becoming a QI) --Mk2010 12:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
      • The disqualifying part are the unresolved categories ("redlinks"). The language should be English according to Commons:Categories#Category_names. However, there are exceptions such as some proper names, biological taxa and names for which the non-English name is most commonly used in the English language (or there is no evidence of usage of an English-language version). --Cccefalon 12:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment Thank you for the explanation! I will note that in the future. --Mk2010 12:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overexposed, burnt sky, color channel clipping. --Smial 22:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 18:42, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

File:16-04-02-Hackathon-Jerusalem-Wikidata-WAT_6017.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Hackathon 2016, Hansen Hospital Jerusalem --Ralf Roletschek 07:33, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Oppose Lightning problems, inclined --Archi38 14:46, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment I don't understand you. --Ralf Roletschek 19:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support The lighting is OK considering this is a night shot. The photo is quite small, but I can't see much wrong with it. --Peulle 10:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 07:13, 21 May 2016 (UTC)