Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 20 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:View on Rodelle 05.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination View on Rodelle, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 22:35, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Why 1/1,000 sec (0.001)? Random exposure time?--Lmbuga 22:44, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Surely an image cannot be declined on exposure time alone? If at all, for high ISO in broad daylight, but I do not see a problem here --DXR 06:14, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
  • 1/1,000 sec, for avoid moving the image. Tournasol7 13:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support A photographer can use any settings they like when taking a photo as long as the result is good. This one looks ok to me. --W.carter 11:15, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The sides are warped, especially the building on the left.--Peulle 15:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support --Jacek Halicki 13:02, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Peulle. I think there is a problem with that lens because there are several of Tournasol7's images that get unsharp to the left border (and in the same centrally sharp focal plane). --Basotxerri 07:44, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 09:25, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blurred at sides --A.Savin 08:34, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The left side indeed is too blurred. Regarding the camera settings, I see however nothing wrong - ISO200 is not a high value. --Uoaei1 11:20, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Uoaei1. Move to 'oppose' you are right, I see that now. --cart-Talk 22:54, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 18:15, 19 May 2017 (UTC)