Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 18 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Maybach_Zeppelin,_Hamburg_(IMG_20190428_102136).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Maybach 62 Zeppelin in Hamburg --MB-one 08:34, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:51, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is a rare car but not a Quality Image. The car is distorted and the rain drops are very disturbing. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 20:37, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Rather low resolution, bad background, inappropriate perspective. Random snapshot. Noise reduction kills all detail. --Smial 08:44, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Bright areas look posterized, and it's not very sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 21:34, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 15:43, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Senja_di_Wakatobi.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2019. By User:Jordan siva --Aldnonymous 03:12, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --GT1976 04:03, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Oversaturated --Podzemnik 09:24, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Podzemnik. Implausible colors. -- Ikan Kekek 21:37, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 15:44, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Suatu_hari_di_surga_Maluku.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2019. By User:Jordan siva --Aldnonymous 03:12, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --GT1976 04:03, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Distorted (see vertical lines) and oversaturated --George Chernilevsky 05:42, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Oversaturated and overprocessed. And: Where do the vertical patterns or bands in the sky come from? --Smial 10:49, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. Those lines are really weird and jarring. In addition, I don't really like the house and all the bungalows to be slanted like that. -- Ikan Kekek 21:39, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 15:45, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Larus_fuscus.004_-_Bristol.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Larus fuscus (Lesser black-backed gull) in 2018, in Bristol, England, United Kingdom. --Drow male 06:42, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 07:47, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Crop too tight. --Ermell 07:56, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ermell. I don't think this kind of "portrait" technique is appropriate for a bird.--Peulle 08:39, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. I think meanwhile we see supported images here which are not so good as this one. -- Spurzem 20:44, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad crop and just avergade quality: noised and blurred a bit (poor camera matrix issues) --George Chernilevsky 07:27, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 15:46, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Self-portrait_of_User-Code,_1811251833,_ako.jpg[edit]

File:Self-portrait of User-Code, 1811251833, ako.jpg

  • Nomination Self-portrait of Code. Ansgar Koreng By User:Code --Alohacrone det 13:46, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Eatcha 14:32, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Crop in the hair rules this out for me. Rodhullandemu 23:43, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 Comment Sent to discuss as there are two points of view here. Acabashi 12:39, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. Cutting hair is a common way to do portraits --Podzemnik 22:26, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - Really sharp headshot. -- Ikan Kekek 07:14, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support I personally don't like it when photographers do this, but focusing on the face like this is a valid technique.--Peulle 11:33, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Rodhullandemu plus the heavy vignette. --MB-one 21:10, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Strong oppose because of lacking colours.... oh, wait, maybe that's part of composition, as crop and vignette are also parts of composition.  Support --Smial 14:30, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per Podzemnik and Peulle. IMHO the vignette is an important part of the composition, the image would be a bit boring without vignetting. --Aristeas 09:26, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Part of the head cut off, no QI for me.--Fischer.H 17:31, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Piotr Bart 19:03, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per above Poco a poco 08:10, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Poco a poco --Billy69150 13:28, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support excellent portrait. And as long as it's executed in a sensible way, cropping of hair is of course perfectly fine – en:David Bailey has been doing that since the sixties [1] --El Grafo 12:35, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Frame is too tight at the top, too large on the left -- Basile Morin 02:18, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good composition. Tournasol7 07:07, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support good composition. --Ralf Roletschek 07:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 10 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 15:47, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Armed_forces_flag_day.svg[edit]

  • Nomination Armed forces flag day badge --~~~~
  • Promotion
  •  Question A transparent flag? --MB-one 11:01, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Who said it's a flag? --Piotr Bart 13:56, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. I'd like you to clarifiy used sources. Two files linked as sources don't containt some of the elements of this flag --Podzemnik 22:07, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment The files linked in sources are linked together to build and complete the badge. --Jinoytommanjaly 02:55, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Question What about the swords for example? How did you know how the flag looks like? I found the flag at other resources and it looks a bit different so that's what is confusing me. Maybe you can link the original flag from an official resource? --Podzemnik 21:23, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Official Source updated --Jinoytommanjaly (talk) 15:45, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks good. KCVelaga 11:21, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - Yes, very good. Podzemnik, are you satisfied with the citation now? -- Ikan Kekek 21:43, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 15:47, 17 May 2019 (UTC)