Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 17 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Spatschlucht_Schriesheim_20220507_1.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Spatschlucht in Schriesheim, Germany --Domob 16:09, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry! Outblown sky. --Steindy 16:43, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
     Comment True, but the subject (and most of the image in fact) is fine. Please discuss. --Domob 18:56, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
    It's not very sharp --Charlesjsharp 19:10, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:31, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

File:SC_Wiener_Neustadt_vs._SK_Austria_Klagenfurt_2015-10-20_(113).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Domenik Schierl catches the ball. Florian Sittsam (öeft) and Remo Mally (right) are watching. The photo was made across the whole place. --Steindy 08:42, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose No 15 obscures the goalkeeper --Charlesjsharp 20:25, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Let's discuss about. --Steindy 09:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Hmmm... difficult shot. Obviously no fault of the photographer as this is an action (continuous?) shot taken from a hundred yards away, but it is a good point that the main subject here should be the keeper catching the ball. I think, on reflection, I could live with part of the lower body being obscured, but the keeper's face and upper body should be visible. Very unlucky that no. 15's hand just happened to be in the way at exactly the wrong time.  weak oppose it is, then.--Peulle 08:16, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I like how the viewer feels like they're part of the action, but the hand blocking the view of the goalie's face spoils the shot for me. -- Ikan Kekek 18:04, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment No problem. It's easy to tell the players at the next match how they have to position themselves so that the photo meets QI's high standards. --Steindy 22:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Not every moment can be a QI from any angle. -- Ikan Kekek 05:49, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
  • +1 --Peulle 16:13, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)--Ikan Kekek 18:04, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Plaque_du_mémorial_(Illhaeusern).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Memorial plaque in Illhaeusern (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:23, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:51, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 20:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support I'm not seeing anyplace where a perspective correction would be useful. Do you have the right photo? -- Ikan Kekek 07:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
I made a correction on May 8, I probably forgot to mention it. Gzen92 06:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)