Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 05 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:009_Wildlife_Photographers_in_ghillie_suits_looking_for_red_deers_4.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wildlife photographers in camouflage clothing looking for red deers 4/6 --Giles Laurent 00:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Colors look a bit artificial, saturation needs toning --Nacaru 21:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
    @Nacaru done, desaturated. Press Ctrl+F5 with image open to see new version. What do you think now ? --Giles Laurent 00:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Much better! the green at the back does not look so artificial now. Nacaru 09:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support. Good and beautiful image -- Spurzem 14:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Anthocharis_cardamines_male_01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Anthocharis cardamines, male, Italy --Syrio 18:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good. --Thi 19:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but I disagree. This one is just too noisy, hardly anything really in focus and low detail. The level of noise is quite astonishing for ISO 200. I wonder whether this could be upscaled or overprocessed? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
  • @Robert Flogaus-Faust: it's been a while since I took this; I may have used the digital zoom, could it be that? --Syrio 12:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Robert, it's either digitally upscaled or it had massive NR applied. --Plozessor 04:22, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others. --Sebring12Hrs 08:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)