Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 04 2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination View of Langweerderwielen from the Zandvlakte in the early morning.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 2 May 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination View of Langweerderwielen from the Zandvlakte in the early morning.
-
- Nomination Hotel Excelsior at Via Veneto 125 in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 03:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sant'Agnese in Agone in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 03:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Piazza Navona in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 03:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunrise in Mühlenbrok in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Scilla luciliae --XRay 03:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chandelier of the Holy Cross chapel (Kreuzkapelle) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Benches in the Holy Cross chapel (Kreuzkapelle) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Daffodils in the Vorpark in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Holy Cross Standard by Moretto da Brescia. --Moroder 02:59, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Painting of a spinner by Giacomo Ceruti. --Moroder 02:59, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nativity. Painting by Romanino A.D.1545 ca. --Moroder 02:59, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Castle «Small Miramar» (year of creation 1898) on Schlossweg #2 in Reifnitz, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:47, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Volkswagen Golf II GTI monument in Reifnitz, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:47, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:29, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boat rental in Reifnitz, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:47, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:29, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lakeside hotel Sille in Reifnitz, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:47, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:29, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cutout from the lakeside hotel Sille in Reifnitz, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:47, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:30, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Sainte Claire College and High School, Rue des Augustins 6 & 8, Lille, France --Velvet 22:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support It would be great if you could get a photo of this in better light, but good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:11, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House mark of timber framed building (1730) in Trier, Germany. --Palauenc05 21:45, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of San Pedro de Portomarín, Galicia (Spain)--Lmbuga 20:34, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Former Sales Office IV of steelworks Gutehoffnungshütte in Oberhausen --Tuxyso 20:11, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Bridge Ripshorstbrücke over the Rhine–Herne Canal in Oberhausen --Tuxyso 20:11, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anacamptis morio, Czechia --Nefronus 19:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell 429 at EBACE 2019, Palexpo, Switzerland --MB-one 11:28, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination The Landesgalerie Niederösterreich (State gallery of Lower Austria) in Krems an der Donau, Lower Austria, Austria (by User:Bwag) --D-Kuru 10:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --TheRunnerUp 13:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Landesgalerie Niederösterreich (State gallery of Lower Austria) in Krems an der Donau, Lower Austria, Austria (by User:Bwag) --D-Kuru 10:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --TheRunnerUp 13:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former Jesuit hostel in Speyer
--F. Riedelio 07:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:45, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Former Jesuit hostel in Speyer
-
- Nomination Former Jesuit hostel in Speyer
--F. Riedelio 07:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 17:58, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Former Jesuit hostel in Speyer
-
- Nomination Bohinj lake from Ukanc (West) on early spring day. Clouds and rain are rather often visitors of this part of Slovenia.--Miha Peče 07:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, darkness adds something to the composition --Michielverbeek 08:47, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Pilgrimage Church of St. Clement --Ermell 06:48, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Stained-glass window of the Saint Radegund church in Sainte-Radegonde, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:10, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Christ carrying the cross. Painting by Romanino. --Moroder 05:48, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 1 May 2021 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ceiling painting with the Coat of arms of the Prince-Bishopric of Speyer by Josef Mariano Kitschker (1907 - 1909), Chapel on the Michaelsberg, Untergrombach --Llez 05:36, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Sant'Eufemia Altarpiece by Moretto. --Moroder 05:18, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Paintings of a girl sewing and a miller by Antonio Cifrondi. --Moroder 05:04, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Paintings of the Rest on the Flight into Egypt. --Moroder 05:04, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Yellow-rumped warbler in Prospect Park --Rhododendrites 02:43, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, IMO there is too much noise and it's not sharp enough. --XRay 07:00, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - view from the bridge toward the chapel. --Tobias ToMar Maier 21:34, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose DoF too shallow, the blurred bridge in the foreground spoils a good composition. f/8 to f/16 would be more suitable. --Tagooty 05:13, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Hermann-Löns-Straße in Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:55, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 03:18, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A retirement home in Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:30, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --C messier 20:45, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the St Marina church in Verdoejo (Valença), Portugal. --Tournasol7 06:06, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --J. Lunau 13:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue in the Saint Peter church in Lodeve, Hérault, France. --Tournasol7 06:06, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --J. Lunau 13:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - view down from the bridge. --Tobias ToMar Maier 11:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. Interesting view angle by the used lense. --J. Lunau 13:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - another view down from the bridge. --Tobias ToMar Maier 11:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. Interesting view angle by the used lense. --J. Lunau 13:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rue de la Brune depuis la rue du Tambour (Pérouges) en avril 2021. --Benoît Prieur 07:12, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose IMHO too soft/unsharp. --C messier 20:43, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Victor Hugo in the garden of Villa Borghese in Rome, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 01:30, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:28, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the footbridge of the metro station Fröttmaning on a route section with trains. It belongs to the Betriebshof Nord --DavidJRasp 09:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 06:47, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: monument in Ukraine, number: 46-206-0015 by Мирослав Видрак-Ezarate 18:34, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review
IMO the original color version is a better candidate. --Rhododendrites 18:56, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
It was nominated twice, it's too grany --Ezarate 19:01, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Larus michahellis --Commonists 10:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Good quality, but QI is for your best pictures; this is not as good as the same bird in your previous nomination--Charlesjsharp 14:44, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you --Commonists 18:10, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Prayer Beads hanging besides the altar inside the Konradskapelle. --Tobias ToMar Maier 22:50, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 06:44, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Nice lighting. By User:Tilman2007 --Discostu 09:56, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Request Nice view. Please fix the vertical lines. The camera settings are not optimal: with sunlight an d a static object you should use lower ISO and a higher aperture with resulting obviously in a less lower exposure time (but you still don't need a tripod). Scuse me if I remind you these "rules". --Moroder 08:15, 24 April 2021 (UTC) - Decline Insufficient quality. Not done within seven days, sorry --Moroder 03:02, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Nice lighting. By User:Tilman2007 --Discostu 09:56, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
_08.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
_-_view_from_the_bridge_toward_the_chapel.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_-_view_down_from_the_bridge.jpg)
_-_another_view_down_from_the_bridge.jpg)
_en_avril_2021.jpg)
.1.jpg)
_-_Prayer_Beads_hanging_besides_the_altar.jpg)
.jpg)
Consensual review[edit]
File:House_in_Quebec_city.jpg[edit]
- Nomination House in Quebec city --Wilfredor 21:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:54, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment For good long term use in Commons and Wikipedia, please add street description and preferably, GPS coordinates, to image description. --GRDN711 00:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I prefer don't add this info for privacy reasons, Im very sorry --Wilfredor 23:09, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support That's reasonable. Good quality for me. --Lion-hearted85 25 April 2021, 14:06 (UTC)
- Support per others. Say which neighborhood it's in if you're comfortable with that, but I trust your decision. -- Ikan Kekek 09:16, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose All right, I'll open a can of worms. "House in Quebec city" is far too inaccurate as a single description for a building. There are no known restictions about depicting buildings in Canada. A photo of a building visible from public space, taken without any aids such as ladders, lifting platforms or photo drones and showing nothing from inside the building, does not violate any privacy rules. There is therefore no reasonable reason to obscure the address or omit it altogether. If a photographer has concerns along these lines, it is better not to publish such a photo in the first place. --Smial 12:10, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Yeah, adding the street's category is very easy and doesn't violate your privacy, unless you say "that's where I live". But then the house still might be identified by someone, so it is obviously much smarter not to upload the picture at all. Simple as is. --A.Savin 12:25, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support As I wrote on the talk page, I don't think we should oblige someone to specify coordinates when privacy is a consideration. Perhaps it's a family member's house, or a friend, or just a place near to where you live. Since it's not a notable building, it's not all that important that we be able to pinpoint exactly where it is. My approach would be to choose a random nearby place (perhaps the center of the city) and use the "prec" location parameter set to like 5000. XRay pointed out on the talk page that there's even a template to show this has been done. Rhododendrites 18:39, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, but if I want to add the information, I can found it and add it. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:46, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- If the uploader intentionally omitted it, I don't think that would be appropriate. We don't add absolutely all information about a subject just because it's possible and someone might find it useful. Practically speaking, there's little use to a specific street address or pinpoint coordinates, but there is potential harm avoided by omitting it. Likewise if a person is depicted, it's also unnecessary to dig up personal information about them (their address, facebook profile, phone number, etc.) even though it's possible and could be useful to someone. I understand this is a flawed analogy, but I feel strongly that our users' pleas for privacy not be ignored except in extraordinary circumstances. Rhododendrites 21:39, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Rhododendrites: As you might have noticed, I didn't demand coordinates. Coordinates are useful for the uttermost motives, but there is no QIC guideline that required it for QI promotion. But we have the requirement of appropriate categorization in the guidelines (COM:QIC 2.1.1.3). And if it is a photo of a non-notable building just "somewhere in Quebec", how is it then in COM:SCOPE? --A.Savin 21:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- I agree that it would benefit from better categorization: type of house, materials used, year built... any of this stuff would help it be in scope. My main point is that I disagree that coordinates (or an address) in particular should be necessary (and I understand you are not saying it is). If, ultimately, it's not in scope, it's not because of the location. After all, what use is the address and pinpointed geocoordinates of a non-notable building or location? Rhododendrites 21:39, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, but if I want to add the information, I can found it and add it. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:46, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The scope is hard to discuss IMO. In this case, it can be for me in scope as an example how houses in Quebec city look like. So I see this not as a problem :) --PantheraLeo1359531 16:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Pigeons_Courting_Ooty_Mar21_A7C_00671.jpg[edit]
- Nomination: Common pigeons (Columba livia) courting, Ooty, India --Tagooty 11:06, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review
- Oppose Too blurry. Sorry. --Ermell 13:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Cmd I request reconsideration of this: With two pigeons in rapid movement while courting, some lack of sharpness is inevitable. I looked through ~150 FP/QI/VI of common pigeons in Category:Columba livia. Only 3-4 show pigeons in motion and all are partly blurry e.g. File:Domestic Pigeon Flock Tree.jpg. There are no images of pigeons courting. --Tagooty 04:14, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support Blur as sign of movement, nothing against it --Moroder 08:04, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Moroder and remarks by nominator. Also a useful photo. -- Ikan Kekek 20:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Weak oppose blur showing movement is ok, and I agree some amount of blur is expected in a shot like this, but the shot that is blurred is itself unclear. With the example of the pigeons in flight, the scene is quite clear ... it's just blurry. In this case, the scene which is blurred wouldn't be clear even if it weren't blurred. If there were a good shot of pigeons courting/mating which just happened to be blurred, that would be one thing, but it's hard to even make out what's happening here, except to know that if two pigeons are interacting like this it's likely some kind of courtship (but, of course, it doesn't have to be). Rhododendrites 03:21, 27 April 2021 (UTC)- Oppose Weak oppose per Ermell and Rhododendrites. --GRDN711 (talk) 11:09, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support Per Moroder --Michielverbeek 05:50, 3 May 2021 (UTC)+
- Oppose Weak oppose per Ermell and Rhododendrites.--Lmbuga 15:36, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
