Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 02 2016
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Statue of José Martí at the Mitad del Mundo, Ecuador --Bgag 03:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Gorgeous and very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Convento de San Diego, Quito, Ecuador --Bgag 03:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eugenio Espejo street in San Pablo del Lago, Otavalo canton, Ecuador --Bgag 03:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vineyard Trippel in Briefelsdorf #55, Feldkirchen, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vineyard Trippel in Briefelsdorf #55, Feldkirchen, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Die zweite von zwei Fußgängerbrücken über die Stör in Kellinghusen. --Nightflyer 20:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Impressionen vom "Kleinen Rensinger See" in Kellinghusen. --Nightflyer 20:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Im Stadtgebiet von Neumünster gibt es mehrere Fussgängerbrücken über die Stör, die keinen eigenen Namen haben. --Nightflyer 20:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The mouth of the creek "Schwale" in the "Stör" --Nightflyer 20:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Impressionen aus dem Landschaftsschutzgebiet des Kreises Pinneberg --Nightflyer 20:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lake Salinas is a salt pan located in the Arequipa Region, Peru. --Poco a poco 17:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 20:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jirueque, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 17:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 20:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Laguna Blanca, Bolivia --Poco a poco 17:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Los Paredones, Nazca, Peru --Poco a poco 17:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nazca Lines, Nazca, Peru --Poco a poco 17:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altstadt von Hebron, Palästina --Ralf Roletschek 16:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 20:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Festina Armbanduhr Tour de France --Ralf Roletschek 15:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Bird observation De Schollevaar. Location, Oostvaardersplassen in the Netherlands.
--Famberhorst 15:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:36, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination View from Bird observation De Schollevaar. Location, Oostvaardersplassen in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination Swelling leaf bud of red beech Fagus sylvatica 'Purpurea'. Location, De Famberhorst in the Netherlands.
--Famberhorst 15:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:36, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Swelling leaf bud of red beech Fagus sylvatica 'Purpurea'. Location, De Famberhorst in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination Decoration details in the assembly hall in the Palace of Justice, Vienna. Architect: Alexander Wielemans von Monteforte --Hubertl 14:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Metope figure at the medium Avant-corps of the Museum of Natural History, Vienna. By Louis Etzmannsdorfer --Hubertl 14:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Metope figure at the medium Avant-corps, Bellariastraße, Museum of Natural History, Vienna. By Louis Etzmannsdorfer --Hubertl 14:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Josve05a (Jonatan) at WMSE headquarters in Stockholm. --Josve05a 13:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Chiesa San Marziale church in Venice. --Moroder 10:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A view of Boland's Mill and surrounding buildings at Grand Canal Dock, Dublin --DXR 08:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A south view of the building housing the Hof-Apotheke at Marktplatz, Bad Mergentheim --DXR 08:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rectory in Mielec 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rectory in Mielec 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rectory in Mielec 3 --Jacek Halicki 08:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Third lodges chapel in Mielec 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Third lodges chapel in Mielec 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Goa: Vasco railway station --A.Savin 07:52, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Goa: market in Vaddem / Vasco --A.Savin 07:52, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Goa: boats in Vaddem / Vasco --A.Savin 07:52, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Goa: terminal of Dabolim Airport --A.Savin 07:52, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Nicholas and Gumbertus in Stublang --Ermell 07:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frau Prof. Dr. Sabine Laschat. --Alchemist-hp 06:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Nature of It Fryske Gea in the Netherlands. Around the heath.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 06:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Nature of It Fryske Gea in the Netherlands. Around the heath.
-
- Nomination BMW i3 at sunrise at the Sandstraße in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Main Object good quality. I think halos in the trees on the left.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Beinan Township, Taitung, Taiwan: A road kill (flat rat) on the parking lot of Beinan Cultural Park. --Cccefalon 04:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Delicious :) QI --Poco a poco 18:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church Saint James the Greater in Tiffen, Steindorf am Ossiacher See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 05:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Switbert Lobisser`s birthplace in Tiffen #28, Steindorf am Ossiacher See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 05:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Memorial near San Pedro de Atacama, Chile --Poco a poco 22:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cemetery in salt flat of Ascotán, Chile --Poco a poco 22:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ermita del Rocío, El Rocío, Huelva, Spain --Poco a poco 22:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture at church of Goiáns, in the municipality of Carballo (Spain). --Elisardojm 16:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Comment
Leaning to the left. Easy to fix.--Ermell 20:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Fixed Ermell.--Elisardojm 09:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 12:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Sculpture at church of Goiáns, in the municipality of Carballo (Spain). --Elisardojm 16:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Comment
-
- Nomination Duck in Piazza Brà (Verona) --Livioandronico2013 19:33, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Decline blurred and poor lighting --A.Savin 07:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Square in Ourense, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 16:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion A bit of noise, but overall ok --Poco a poco 18:43, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Done. Thanks Poco a poco--Lmbuga 13:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of St. Wendelin in St. Nicholas and Gumbertus in Stublang --Ermell 13:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Quality is good but the category is too general (what about church of ...?) and others (status) are missing Poco a poco 18:45, 27 April 2016 (UTC) Done
True. Added some more categories. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 22:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Statue of St. Wendelin in St. Nicholas and Gumbertus in Stublang --Ermell 13:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flying Andean flamingos (Phoenicoparrus andinus), Laguna Colorada, Bolivia --Poco a poco 19:07, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Oppose Not sharp enough; it's a difficult shot, this, given the distance. But since the birds are the subject, they should be sharp. --Peulle 18:51, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
I think that you're right. I take it back. Poco a poco 19:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cranium of a vulpes vulpes, ventralview. --Sven Volkens 23:04, 24 April 2016 (UTC) Comment CA on all the image and the other pictures also Ezarate 00:22, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Chromatic aberrations. Decline according to the photographers opinion, that there is no reason to enhance (see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#File:Chelydra-serpentina3.jpg --Cccefalon 08:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Comment That I did not say in any way. Beside this quality-issue my statement is reason to decline, even while there is a discussion for another picture ongoing? Comment fixed it. --Sven Volkens 12:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cranium of a felis silvestris catus, craniocaudal view. --Sven Volkens 23:04, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Chromatic aberrations. Decline according to the photographers opinion, that there is no reason to enhance (see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#File:Chelydra-serpentina3.jpg) --Cccefalon 08:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Comment fixed it. --Sven Volkens 12:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Below minimum size requirement --Cccefalon 17:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cranium of a felis silvestris catus, lateral view. --Sven Volkens 23:04, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Chromatic aberrations. Decline according to the photographers opinion, that there is no reason to enhance (see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#File:Chelydra-serpentina3.jpg --Cccefalon 08:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Comment fixed it. --Sven Volkens 12:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Below minimum size requirement --Cccefalon 17:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cranium of a chelydra serpentina, ventral view. --Sven Volkens 23:04, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Chromatic aberrations. Decline according to the photographers opinion, that there is no reason to enhance (see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#File:Chelydra-serpentina3.jpg --Cccefalon 08:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Comment fixed it. --Sven Volkens 12:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Below minimum size requirement --Cccefalon 17:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Khammam Town as seen from Narasimha Swamy hill in Khammam, India. --Nikhilb239 04:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Review Could be eligible for QI, when a) the perspective is corrected (on the right, and the horizon), b) chromatic aberrations removed --A.Savin 13:06, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Procesión de la Muy Ilustre y Fervorosa Hermandad y Cofradía de Nazarenos de Nuestro Padre Jesús de la Pasión, María Santísima del Amor y San Juan Evangelista. Miércoles Santo. Córdoba, España. --ElBute 12:58, 22 April 2016 (UTC) * Comment what is the referrer to wikidata good for? --Hubertl 14:48, 22 April 2016 (UTC) Comment Used for Wiki Loves Folk, a photo contest organised by Wikimedia Spain --ElBute 15:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC) * Comment I have seen it, but for what is it good for? There is no necessary or significant information for user except consternations. --Hubertl 20:16, 22 April 2016 (UTC) Comment I'm missing the point. The referrer was added by the upload form of the contest. None of my business. A review of the image based on its quality is still needed. --ElBute 11:57, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Procesión de la Ilustre, Piadosa y Secular Hermandad de Penitencia y Cofradía de Nazarenos de la Vía Sacra de Nuestro Padre Jesús del Calvario, Nuestra Señora del Mayor Dolor y San Lorenzo Mártir. Miércoles Santo. Córdoba, España. --ElBute 12:58, 22 April 2016 (UTC) Comment what is the referrer to wikidata good for? --Hubertl 14:48, 22 April 2016 (UTC) Comment Used for Wiki Loves Folk, a photo contest organised by Wikimedia Spain --ElBute 15:04, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok for me --Hubertl 15:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Índio do Río Uaupés. Décio Villares 194 x130 cm. 1882 --The Photographer 11:59, 18 April 2016 (UTC) * Question I take it this is a photograph of the actual work - how does this work with categorization and the QI image guidelines? --Peulle 21:49, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 15:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
File:753 759+758 CZ-CDC Paskov - Biocel Paskov.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Wood block train for Biocel Paskov pulp mill --Cmelak770 18:30, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:36, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. WB should be fixed and dustspots removed.--Ermell 22:13, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ermell --Cccefalon 04:11, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Green and blue colours are painfull for my eyes, it's quiet simple to correct this (see note Ermell), untill now a Oppose --Michielverbeek 05:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose oversaturated, visible dustspots. --Alchemist-hp 21:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Alchemist-hp 21:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
File:2016_Wrocław,_Rynek_44_01.jpg[edit]
- Nomination 44 Market Square in Wrocław 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:18, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose It looks tilted. Can it be fixed before promotion? --Peulle 13:13, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support where is the tilt? It seems ok for me. If you mean the horizontal tilt, this is the fully correct perspective distortion. --Hubertl 18:10, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Photo is not tilted. Only person in right bottom corner disturb the image but that's no reason for a decline --Michielverbeek 05:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Chelydra-serpentina3.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Skull of a chelydra serpentina, lateral view. --Sven Volkens 23:04, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment CA on left side Ezarate 00:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment compared to what w:Purple fringing shows I am not that unhappy, but yeah. -Sven Volkens 13:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe but I prefer another reviewer opinion Ezarate 19:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment compared to what w:Purple fringing shows I am not that unhappy, but yeah. -Sven Volkens 13:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support The image is well lit and has decent focus, which is hard to achieve on such a 3D object. Probably not a featured picture, but I think good enough for QI. Let's discuss. --Peulle 10:49, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
OpposeChromatic aberrations. There are always worse examples but that is not a reason to bypass necessary enhancements. --Cccefalon 05:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)- Comment
We are talking about roughly a width of 10px in a 5000x3000px image. As far as I understand this is a physical issue resulting of a poor quality lense on my equipment. this is as good as it gets for me. Compared to the effort I put into this image I belive the quality-issue is rather small. especially after reading the "value" and "purpose" section again ;-) --Sven Volkens 14:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- I still do not understand, why - instead of arguing and arguing - you just do not remove the CA. That is the simplest task in whole postprocessing. A 10px CA is absolutely not acceptable. Same goes for your other images of the skulls which I declined too. --Cccefalon 19:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Cccefalon: lesson learned - I did use lightroom now (thank's to User:Raymond's teaching), removing CA really is a thing on open source tools (and as a bloody w:noob), thanks everyone! -Sven Volkens (talk) 12:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Thank you --Cccefalon 15:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Iglesia_de_San_Francisco,_Lima,_Perú,_2015-07-28,_DD_74.jpg[edit]
- Nomination: Church of St Franciscus, Lima, Peru --Poco a poco 08:55, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- Review
- Oppose Too much noise (grainy). --Peulle 14:18, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Not sure about that, looks good enough for QI to me, please, let's discuss --Poco a poco 17:40, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Sure thing - I looked particularly at the "temple" bits (not the people), and the Jesus statue and flat golden panels all look quite grainy to me.
- Support weak pro, but Pro. The demanded issues are acceptable. --Hubertl 10:53, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support OK for me. --Alchemist-hp 21:47, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Alchemist-hp 21:47, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Ferrari-Monaco-4071013.jpg[edit]
- Nomination: Ferrari 488 GTB --Ermell 12:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- Review
- Comment Image contains only a small portion of the car; title insufficient. --Peulle 14:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC) **@Peulle:
DoneI hope it´s better now. Thanks for the review--Ermell 09:24, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Looks better now; the image itself is good and now the title stuff is OK. QI for me, unless someone disagrees? --Peulle 09:21, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose not working out: for a side-view the perspective is wrong, unfortunatly there is another car in the back, logo is blurry. -Sven Volkens (talk) 14:42, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Hubertl 05:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Protea_coronata_1-9818.jpg[edit]
- Nomination: Protea coronata, flowerhead --SAplants 17:23, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Review
- Oppose DoF too small. --Peulle 17:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment User:Peulle, can you explain your double standard of assessing the DoF between the two Protea flowerheads? Obviously, the DoF is the same, but one image is supported and the other declined. --Cccefalon 20:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Hello, yes, I find the DoF in this makes the centre out of focus, whereas the other has a different angle so that the centre of the flower remains in focus. Others may disagree, if so, feel free to weigh in. --Peulle 20:48, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment User:Peulle, can you explain your double standard of assessing the DoF between the two Protea flowerheads? Obviously, the DoF is the same, but one image is supported and the other declined. --Cccefalon 20:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 08:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support DoF is fine. OK for me. --XRay 12:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose nothing against DoF but disturbing overexposition (not fixable) --Christian Ferrer 17:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose too tight crop and DoF problem. --Alchemist-hp 21:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Alchemist-hp 21:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)