Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 27 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Bachstelze_-_Bergeronnette_grise_-_White_wagtail_04.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination White wagtail (Motacilla alba). Sarıçam - Adana, Turkey. --Zcebeci 07:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Great! --Stepro 07:45, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This isn't up to Zcebeci's usual high standards. Charlesjsharp 15:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support In my opinion, this is a QI. Perhaps the highlights of the bird's head could be lowered a bit but even without this is already OK for promotion. --Basotxerri 17:36, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Ram-Man 11:26, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Very nice, good composition and good quality. -- Spurzem 20:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 12:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

File:MPV_Constitution_1.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination MPV Constitution departing False Creek in Vancouver, Canada. --Riley Huntley 05:26, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment IMHO, underexposed, needs tilt/perspective correction, and more categories. --C messier 14:56, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. I like the exposure and find the perspective just fine. I did a levels adjustment and it completely changes the mood of the photo. Let the end user decide. Ram-Man 22:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose to keep it in discussion, I agree with C messier --Hubertl 05:29, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I could live with that tilted perspective, but there is strong CA, and some s-curving could enhance colours and contrast. -- Smial 10:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too dark and no good perspective -- Spurzem 20:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 12:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)