Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 16 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Havildar_of_The_Grenadiers.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Havildar of the Grenadiers of the Indian Army. The Grenadiers is an infantry regiment.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Uniformed services (India) --Suyash.dwivedi 21:27, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. GrandEscogriffe
  •  Oppose I like this portrait. But unfortunately main parts of the image are showing blown out sky. --Augustgeyler 11:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
    •  Support It looks like a cloud out of focus. I would say it is not a problem for this portrait. --LexKurochkin 08:16, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support It's hard to say, cause it's blurred so much, but since the main object is really sharp and well taken, and there are no relevant details blown out in the background I would excuse this kind of maybe blown out sky parts.--Der Angemeldete 13:09, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support per Der Angemeldete. The sky is somewhat blown out, but it's a good portrait. -- Ikan Kekek 04:05, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 10:22, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

File:March_2023_in_Puerto_Vallarta,_Jalisco_-_093.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Puente Río Cuale, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 17:03, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. -- 17:46, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Level of detail is not meeting QI standards. --Augustgeyler 03:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support The details are adequate to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 04:09, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 10:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Palacio_del_Municipio,_Arezzo,_Italia,_2022-09-17,_DD_29.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Palazzo del Comune, Arezzo, Italy --Poco a poco 11:47, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose I can't stand this perspective. --Der Angemeldete 12:06, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment That you cannot stand it doesn't sound to me like a valid reason to prevent the image from becoming QI. Please, let's discuss. I see no problem with this image indeed. --Poco a poco 23:14, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
      •  Agree Yes there's nothing wrong with hearing other opinions, because the perspective of an image seems often be part of an argument and personal preferences here. However, there is often the same type of concerns with this kind of perspective, so I didn't want to repeat. The ground is cut off, the eye got no orientation there, the horizontal line is oblique due to the view on the seam of the roofs. Not to mention that the turret from this view seems tilted. The light can't be optimal, because the upper parts of the turret are brighter then the lower parts, where you had your focus on. Therefore the upper parts are blurred and the sky above the gutter seems slightly overexposed, even though ISO and exposure time are ok here.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 12:14, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Perspective is a matter of taste (see for example Worm's-eye view of towers), but the photograph is IMO still QI. --XRay 11:57, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support The perspective is natural.--KaiBorgeest 22:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 10:20, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

File:BMW_U11_1X7A6760.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination BMW X1 in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 18:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose The hood is overexposed. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
    •  Support It looks good to me. I think what you're seeing is the reflections on the bonnet? --Mike Peel 21:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
      •  Comment I'm referring to the left side of the bonnet/hood, compared to the other whites of the parts it looked a bit overexposed.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:38, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
        • It looks OK to me, particularly since it's a white car so any over-exposure blends in, but maybe @Alexander-93: could tweak it? Thanks. Mike Peel 12:13, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support OK to me --LexKurochkin 08:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Fine to me --Poco a poco 10:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support per others. I see details on the hood, so I think it's OK. -- Ikan Kekek 04:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 10:16, 15 March 2023 (UTC)