Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 29 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Patot_Diya_and_Bhoja_Mass_-_Dibrugarh_-_Assam.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Patot Diya Maas, a traditional Assamese style small fish Steamed In Banana Leave. --অজয় দাস 15:24, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Sharness feels marginal to me, but I will support, once you add at least one category for fish as food. -- Ikan Kekek 20:25, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sharpness/detail quality not enough imo, sorry. --Nefronus 18:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support High resolution for a food picture and enough of it is sharp enough, in my opinion, but অজয় দাস, please add appropriate categories as I requested on June 17. -- Ikan Kekek 13:48, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan, I tried my hand at better categories --Kritzolina 16:34, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:45, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Cathedral_of_Uzes_(1).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Cathedral of Uzes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 17:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry, but the cars are too disturbing for me. --Steindy 19:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality to me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:47, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support QI isn't FP, cars may be disturbing but overall quality is OK. Selbymay 10:20, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per Selbymay. --Aristeas 07:16, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:47, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Poranna_mgła_nad_starorzeczem_Wisły_w_Kryspinowie,_20210610_0449_7112.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Morning fog over Vistula River oxbow lake in Kryspinów --Jakubhal 05:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Nefronus 06:17, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose Landscape f/4.. The lack of sky and clarity of the image in the foreground and background. Sorry. --Александр Байдуков 14:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Insufficient DoF. Composition does not highlight "morning fog". --Tagooty 05:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Excellent composition and beautiful colors and light --Moroder 09:12, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support Again a little oversaturated, Everything else very good. --Smial 08:15, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 00:17, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:49, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Hamburg_airport_station_2021.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hamburg airport station --Arne Müseler 10:39, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose Great composition, but too noisy IMO. Let's discuss. Alexander Novikov 08:10, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Alexander. It's like a grainy analog photo. -- Ikan Kekek 06:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too noisy. --Steindy 21:47, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Noise level rather high, but regarding the provided resolution still acceptable. Can be printed to A4 or larger without relevant issues. Btw: a grainy "analog" photo looks completely different. Have you ever pushed an HP4 or an Kodak Recording 2475 to ISO1600 or higher? --Smial 11:07, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'm just reacting to the appearance of the photo, as I see it. -- Ikan Kekek 16:56, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Quality images guidelines says: "Images should not have distracting amount of noise when viewed in full size." -- Alexander Novikov 01:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Good point ;–). We should probably revise that guideline; it goes back to times when 4 MPx or so were a high resolution … --Aristeas 07:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:50, 28 June 2021 (UTC)