Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 25 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • * Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Hundsleiten“ in Stetten (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 04:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Hundsleiten“ in Stetten (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 04:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Hundsleiten“ in Stetten (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 04:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Hundsleiten“ in Stetten (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 04:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Hundsleiten“ in Stetten (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Hundsleiten“ in Stetten (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Hundsleiten“ in Stetten (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 04:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Hundsleiten“ in Stetten (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 04:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Hundsleiten“ in Stetten (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 04:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Hundsleiten“ in Stetten (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 04:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Former provost house and collegiate church Saint Martin in Gurnitz, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Former provost house and collegiate church Saint Martin in Gurnitz, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mansion and old brewhouse on the Kirchenstrasse #30 at Gurnitz, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:27, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mansion and old brewhouse on the Kirchenstrasse #30 at Gurnitz, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 04:27, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Bay at the mansion and old brewhouse on Kirchenstrasse #30 in Gurnitz, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Bay at the mansion and old brewhouse on Kirchenstrasse #30 in Gurnitz, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mansion and old brewhouse on the Kirchenstrasse #30 in Gurnitz, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mansion and old brewhouse on the Kirchenstrasse #30 in Gurnitz, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Portal wall of the mansion and old brewhouse on Kirchenstrasse #30 in Gurnitz, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:13, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Portal wall of the mansion and old brewhouse on Kirchenstrasse #30 in Gurnitz, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support
      Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:13, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Glaucous-winged gull hovering overhead Atsme 21:43, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 22:04, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Glaucous-winged gull hovering overhead Atsme 21:43, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 22:04, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ford Mustang from 1966 Spurzem 21:24, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --MB-one 23:10, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ford Mustang from 1966 Spurzem 21:24, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --MB-one 23:10, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Grade II listed St Anthony's RC church on Scotland Road, Liverpool. --Rodhullandemu 20:51, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Grade II listed St Anthony's RC church on Scotland Road, Liverpool. --Rodhullandemu 20:51, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support
      Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Market squere in Bardejov --Jakubhal 20:22, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 22:36, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Market squere in Bardejov --Jakubhal 20:22, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 22:36, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Nao Victoria (ship, 1992) --Christian Ferrer 20:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. Atsme 23:37, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Nao Victoria (ship, 1992) --Christian Ferrer 20:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. Atsme 23:37, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination A panoramic view of the Toledo Infantry Academy building, Toledo, Spain, 2018 --ViseMoD 16:25, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:18, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination A panoramic view of the Toledo Infantry Academy building, Toledo, Spain, 2018 --ViseMoD 16:25, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support
      Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:18, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Church of the Society of Jesus, Quito, Ecuador --Poco a poco 15:38, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:03, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Church of the Society of Jesus, Quito, Ecuador --Poco a poco 15:38, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:03, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Victoria Falls, Zambia-Zimbabwe --Poco a poco 15:38, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:47, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Victoria Falls, Zambia-Zimbabwe --Poco a poco 15:38, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:47, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination View of Tallinn from St. Olaf's church, Estonia --Poco a poco 15:38, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:46, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination View of Tallinn from St. Olaf's church, Estonia --Poco a poco 15:38, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:46, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sam Nujoma Ave, Swakopmund, Namibia --Poco a poco 15:38, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:46, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sam Nujoma Ave, Swakopmund, Namibia --Poco a poco 15:38, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:46, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kiruna old fire station. --ArildV 13:36, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:42, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kiruna old fire station. --ArildV 13:36, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:42, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The street Föreningsgatan in Kiruna, Sweden. --ArildV 13:36, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 13:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination The street Föreningsgatan in Kiruna, Sweden. --ArildV 13:36, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 13:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Buildings on the street "Gruvfogdegatan" in Kiruna, Sweden. --ArildV 12:20, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 21:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Buildings on the street "Gruvfogdegatan" in Kiruna, Sweden. --ArildV 12:20, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 21:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Buildings in the intersection of Kengisgatan and Gustaf Wickmansgatan in Kiruna. --ArildV 12:20, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:42, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Buildings in the intersection of Kengisgatan and Gustaf Wickmansgatan in Kiruna. --ArildV 12:20, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:42, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Eviation Alice at Paris Air Show 2019 --MB-one 11:48, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:49, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Eviation Alice at Paris Air Show 2019 --MB-one 11:48, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:49, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Toyota Raider (HiLux) Double Cab in Simon's Town, Cape Town --MB-one 11:48, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:42, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Toyota Raider (HiLux) Double Cab in Simon's Town, Cape Town --MB-one 11:48, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:42, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Airbus Helicopters Dauphin at EBACE 2019, Palexpo, Switzerland --MB-one 11:48, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --ArildV 12:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Airbus Helicopters Dauphin at EBACE 2019, Palexpo, Switzerland --MB-one 11:48, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --ArildV 12:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Hyundai Kona Electric at Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 11:48, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Hyundai Kona Electric at Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 11:48, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Facade portal and grisaille fresco by Enrico Albrici of the Santa Maria della Carità church. --Moroder 10:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Facade portal and grisaille fresco by Enrico Albrici of the Santa Maria della Carità church. --Moroder 10:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support
      Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Facade of the San Luca church in Brescia --Moroder 10:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:51, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Facade of the San Luca church in Brescia --Moroder 10:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:51, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The rock walls Duledes and the Val Culea alley in the Langental vally. --Moroder 10:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:16, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination The rock walls Duledes and the Val Culea alley in the Langental vally. --Moroder 10:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support
      Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:16, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Friends Towers, Munich, a residential high-rise complex, June 2019 - detail of facade --Martin Falbisoner 09:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --ArildV 12:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Friends Towers, Munich, a residential high-rise complex, June 2019 - detail of facade --Martin Falbisoner 09:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --ArildV 12:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Documentation and meeting center at the site of the Second World War concentration camp KZ Hinzert--Cayambe 08:39, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 09:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Documentation and meeting center at the site of the Second World War concentration camp KZ Hinzert--Cayambe 08:39, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 09:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The Pitla Piza de Puez peak in the Puez-Geisler Nature Park, Dolomites. --Moroder 08:29, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 09:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination The Pitla Piza de Puez peak in the Puez-Geisler Nature Park, Dolomites. --Moroder 08:29, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 09:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The Col Turont and southern face of the Langental vally. --Moroder 08:28, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:18, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination The Col Turont and southern face of the Langental vally. --Moroder 08:28, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support
      Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:18, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Avenue du Docteur Pezet (Montpellier) en juin 2019. --Benoît Prieur 08:23, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 09:55, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Avenue du Docteur Pezet (Montpellier) en juin 2019. --Benoît Prieur 08:23, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 09:55, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination MS Maxima from Nicko Cruises at Hafen Melk, Austria.--GT1976 06:12, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination MS Maxima from Nicko Cruises at Hafen Melk, Austria.--GT1976 06:12, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support
      Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination MS Maxima from Nicko Cruises at Hafen Melk, Austria.--GT1976 06:12, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination MS Maxima from Nicko Cruises at Hafen Melk, Austria.--GT1976 06:12, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support
      Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Portal of the former Probstenhof of the monastery Michelfeld in the Upper Palatinate in Zeil am Main --Ermell 06:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 06:12, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Portal of the former Probstenhof of the monastery Michelfeld in the Upper Palatinate in Zeil am Main --Ermell 06:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 06:12, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Wall in a sandstone quarry near Sand am Main --Ermell 06:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 06:12, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Wall in a sandstone quarry near Sand am Main --Ermell 06:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 06:12, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Emblem relief in the wall of Schloss Wiesenthau --Ermell 06:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:36, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Emblem relief in the wall of Schloss Wiesenthau --Ermell 06:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support
      Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:36, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Grave plate in the cemetery wall of the catholic parish church St. Michael in Zeil --Ermell 06:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 06:12, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Grave plate in the cemetery wall of the catholic parish church St. Michael in Zeil --Ermell 06:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 06:12, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Emblem relief in the wall of Schloss Wiesenthau --Ermell 06:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:22, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Emblem relief in the wall of Schloss Wiesenthau --Ermell 06:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:22, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Airbus A380 of Emirates over Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.--GT1976 05:56, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose This photo lacks sharpness. Very hard to get these type of photos sharp even with expensive equipment. --Ermell 06:13, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Airbus A380 of Emirates over Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.--GT1976 05:56, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose This photo lacks sharpness. Very hard to get these type of photos sharp even with expensive equipment. --Ermell 06:13, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea. Stump of a sawn-off branch of a Pinaceae. --Famberhorst 05:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC) }}
    • Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea. Stump of a sawn-off branch of a Pinaceae.
      --Famberhorst 05:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    }}
  • * Nomination Rumex --Famberhorst 05:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC) }}
    • Nomination Rumex
      --Famberhorst 05:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    }}
  • * Nomination Back part with gallery of the Iglesia de San Francisco, Santa Cruz de La Palma --Llez 05:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Back part with gallery of the Iglesia de San Francisco, Santa Cruz de La Palma --Llez 05:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Anterior part with sanctuary of the interior of the Iglesia de San Francisco, Santa Cruz de La Palma --Llez 05:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:46, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Anterior part with sanctuary of the interior of the Iglesia de San Francisco, Santa Cruz de La Palma --Llez 05:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:46, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Convento de San Francisco Santa Cruz de La Palma --Llez 05:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:43, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Convento de San Francisco
      Santa Cruz de La Palma --Llez 05:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:43, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination House, 7 Calle San Francisco, Santa Cruz de La Palma --Llez 05:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:44, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination House, 7 Calle San Francisco, Santa Cruz de La Palma --Llez 05:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:44, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Vue de la Réserve naturelle régionale de la côte de Delme vers le nord-est en direction de Juville. --Musicaline 05:27, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--PJDespa 08:58, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Vue de la Réserve naturelle régionale de la côte de Delme vers le nord-est en direction de Juville. --Musicaline 05:27, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--PJDespa 08:58, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Vue de la Côte de Delme depuis la route départementale D74 entre Delme et Tincry. --Musicaline 05:27, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--PJDespa 08:58, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Vue de la Côte de Delme depuis la route départementale D74 entre Delme et Tincry. --Musicaline 05:27, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--PJDespa 08:58, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Vue de la Côte de Delme depuis la route départementale D74 entre Delme et Tincry. --Musicaline 05:27, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Vue de la Côte de Delme depuis la route départementale D74 entre Delme et Tincry. --Musicaline 05:27, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Prairie et forêt alluviale dans la brume matinale dans la réserve naturelle régionale de la Moselle sauvage. --Musicaline 05:27, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. ~~~~ --Atsme 01:29, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Prairie et forêt alluviale dans la brume matinale dans la réserve naturelle régionale de la Moselle sauvage. --Musicaline 05:27, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Insufficient quality. ~~~~ --Atsme 01:29, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Camptogramma bilineata (yellow shell) at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.--GT1976 05:19, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Not in focus ~~~~ --Atsme 01:32, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Camptogramma bilineata (yellow shell) at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.--GT1976 05:19, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Not in focus ~~~~ --Atsme 01:32, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Airbus A380 of Emirates over Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.--GT1976 05:18, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Special.--Famberhorst 05:47, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Airbus A380 of Emirates over Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.--GT1976 05:18, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Special.--Famberhorst 05:47, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Steinkreuz bei Nappersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:43, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:15, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Steinkreuz bei Nappersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:43, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:15, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Hundsleiten“ in Stetten (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:43, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:15, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Hundsleiten“ in Stetten (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:43, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:15, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Hundsleiten“ in Stetten (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:43, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:15, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Hundsleiten“ in Stetten (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:43, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:15, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Singer Mathea --Tsui 03:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 08:32, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Singer Mathea --Tsui 03:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 08:32, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Regenbogenparade/Vienna Pride 2019 --Tsui 03:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--PJDespa 09:06, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Regenbogenparade/Vienna Pride 2019 --Tsui 03:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--PJDespa 09:06, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination North face of the Tête Rousse + Aiguille de Bionnassay. --Jacek79 22:48, 21 June 2019 (UTC) * Decline Could you fix the CA everywhere and remove the big spot in the middle ? Musicaline 05:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC) @Musicaline: Lens flare (?) and purple & cyan margins removed. OK now? --Jacek79 22:06, 22 June 2019 (UTC) Sorry Jacek79, it is better but not a QI for me. You can ask consensual review. Regards. Musicaline 03:41, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination North face of the Tête Rousse + Aiguille de Bionnassay. --Jacek79 22:48, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Decline Could you fix the CA everywhere and remove the big spot in the middle ? Musicaline 05:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

      @Musicaline: Lens flare (?) and purple & cyan margins removed. OK now? --Jacek79 22:06, 22 June 2019 (UTC) Sorry Jacek79, it is better but not a QI for me. You can ask consensual review. Regards. Musicaline 03:41, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Grade II* listed Georgian brick church close to the Anglican Cathedral, Liverpool. --Rodhullandemu 22:47, 21 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --PJDespa 10:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Grade II* listed Georgian brick church close to the Anglican Cathedral, Liverpool. --Rodhullandemu 22:47, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --PJDespa 10:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Hydrangea (snowball hortensia) at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.--GT1976 22:28, 21 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Musicaline 05:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Hydrangea (snowball hortensia) at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.--GT1976 22:28, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Musicaline 05:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Veal under his mother --PJDespa 22:48, 21 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Musicaline 05:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Veal under his mother --PJDespa 22:48, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Musicaline 05:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination View of Cerro Brujo, San Cristobal Island, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 21:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Musicaline 05:36, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination View of Cerro Brujo, San Cristobal Island, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 21:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Musicaline 05:36, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination New Schleissheim Palace, Oberschleissheim, Germany --Poco a poco 21:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 08:35, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination New Schleissheim Palace, Oberschleissheim, Germany --Poco a poco 21:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 08:35, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Black slug (Arion ater) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:23, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Christian Blex im Rahmen des WLP Projektes im Landtag NRW von User:Foto-AG Melle --Olaf Kosinsky 13:38, 21 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 16:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Christian Blex im Rahmen des WLP Projektes im Landtag NRW von User:Foto-AG Melle --Olaf Kosinsky 13:38, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Aristeas 16:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Stefan Berger im Rahmen des WLP Projektes im Landtag NRW von User:Foto-AG Melle --Olaf Kosinsky 13:38, 21 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 08:37, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Stefan Berger im Rahmen des WLP Projektes im Landtag NRW von User:Foto-AG Melle --Olaf Kosinsky 13:38, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 08:37, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The Langental vally in the Puez-Geisler Nature Park. --Moroder 16:16, 20 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --ArildV 16:32, 20 June 2019 (UTC)  Comment There is a black spot, on the rocks, at the right side. What is it ? (See the note) Musicaline 16:35, 20 June 2019 (UTC)  Done Cleaned the DS --Moroder 13:30, 21 June 2019 (UTC) Thanks, it is a nice view. Musicaline 19:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination The Langental vally in the Puez-Geisler Nature Park. --Moroder 16:16, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --ArildV 16:32, 20 June 2019 (UTC)  Comment There is a black spot, on the rocks, at the right side. What is it ? (See the note) Musicaline 16:35, 20 June 2019 (UTC) ✓ Done Cleaned the DS --Moroder 13:30, 21 June 2019 (UTC) Thanks, it is a nice view. Musicaline 19:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Aveyron River in Rodez, Aveyron department, France. --Tournasol7 07:03, 19 June 2019 (UTC) * Withdrawn Area in the middle left is unsharp. Is that fixable? --Ermell 07:11, 19 June 2019 (UTC) Unfortunately not fixable, Tournasol7 14:07, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Caracola (Snail), Tower Park, La Coruña, Spain --Poco a poco 09:21, 17 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:45, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Caracola (Snail), Tower Park, La Coruña, Spain --Poco a poco 09:21, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --C messier 09:45, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Eastern Crown or Antique Crown. By User:Vanderchenok --Piotr Bart 21:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC) * * Review needed
  • * Nomination: Kiani Crown of Imperial Iran (heraldry). By User:Sodacan --Piotr Bart 21:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Kiani Crown of Imperial Iran (heraldry). By User:Sodacan --Piotr Bart 21:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: The heraldic badge of the Unicorn Pursuivant of Arms, a royal herald of the Court of the Lord Lyon. Blazon: A unicorn couchant Argent, horned, unguled, maned and tufted Or gorged of a coronet of four fleurs-de-lys (two visible) and four crosses pattee (one and two halves visible) Or. By User:Sodacan --Piotr Bart 21:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: The heraldic badge of the Unicorn Pursuivant of Arms, a royal herald of the Court of the Lord Lyon. Blazon: A unicorn couchant Argent, horned, unguled, maned and tufted Or gorged of a coronet of four fleurs-de-lys (two visible) and four crosses pattee (one and two halves visible) Or. By User:Sodacan --Piotr Bart 21:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: The heraldic badge of the Snawdoun Herald of Arms, a royal herald of the Court of the Lord Lyon. Blazon: Issuant from battlements Proper a unicorn’s head erased Argent, horned and crined and grasping in his mouth the sword Excalibur Or all ensigned of the Crown of Scotland Proper. By User:Sodacan --Piotr Bart 21:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: The heraldic badge of the Snawdoun Herald of Arms, a royal herald of the Court of the Lord Lyon. Blazon: Issuant from battlements Proper a unicorn’s head erased Argent, horned and crined and grasping in his mouth the sword Excalibur Or all ensigned of the Crown of Scotland Proper. By User:Sodacan --Piotr Bart 21:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: Tramway on Cathedral square in Lisbon, Portugal. --Chabe01 12:57, 16 June 2019 (UTC) * Review Tilted in cw direction (and may also need a perspective correction) --Poco a poco 17:25, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Tramway on Cathedral square in Lisbon, Portugal. --Chabe01 12:57, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Review
      Tilted in cw direction (and may also need a perspective correction) --Poco a poco 17:25, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Plantago weldenii --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:27, 16 June 2019 (UTC) * * Review needed
  • * Nomination Saint Lawrence churches of Vieillevie, Cantal, France. --Tournasol7 06:43, 16 June 2019 (UTC) * Withdrawn It is tilted in ccw direction --Poco a poco 07:29, 16 June 2019 (UTC) Too difficult for me. Many verticals are different, Tournasol7 14:06, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse in Nappersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:09, 15 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:45, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse in Nappersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:09, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --C messier 09:45, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Seguin River, Parry Sound, Ontario, Canada. --СССР 04:25, 15 June 2019 (UTC) * Decline Resolution small for this kind of photo. Sharpness could be better too. --XRay 04:50, 15 June 2019 (UTC)  Done: improved sharpness. --СССР 04:37, 16 June 2019 (UTC)  Comment Sharpness better, but resolution not. (BTW: A smartphone isn't a good choice to take photographs.) --XRay 05:25, 16 June 2019 (UTC) Obviously, but one doesn't always walk around with a DSLR. In any case, this is the maximum resolution that I have, and it is well above the 2MP minimum --СССР 22:19, 16 June 2019 (UTC)  Comment Yes, above 2 MP. But this kind of image should has a much better resolution. Please read the guidelines: "reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily". --XRay 17:56, 17 June 2019 (UTC) There is nothing in the guidelines about requiring photos of subjects that can be photographed easily to have a much better resolution. This image is 3.35 MP, which is 1.675 times higher than the 2 MP minimum. What is a much better resolution anyway, 2× the minimum? 5×? Why not 10×? This is a very nebulous term, which we can't possibly use consistently. --СССР 19:44, 18 June 2019 (UTC)  Comment The resolution of the iPhone 7 is 12 MP. This or a similar resolution would be acceptable for this kind of photograph. But the photographic quality of an iPhone 7 could be not good enough. If you like to discuss the guidelines, please use the discussion page. --XRay 05:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC)  Done - resolution increased --СССР 03:16, 20 June 2019 (UTC)  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. It is not sharp enough. If you think, it is good enough, please change to discussion (consensual review). --XRay 04:33, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Seguin River, Parry Sound, Ontario, Canada. --СССР 04:25, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Decline
      Resolution small for this kind of photo. Sharpness could be better too. --XRay 04:50, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
      ✓ Done: improved sharpness. --СССР 04:37, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
       Comment Sharpness better, but resolution not. (BTW: A smartphone isn't a good choice to take photographs.) --XRay 05:25, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
      Obviously, but one doesn't always walk around with a DSLR. In any case, this is the maximum resolution that I have, and it is well above the 2MP minimum --СССР 22:19, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
       Comment Yes, above 2 MP. But this kind of image should has a much better resolution. Please read the guidelines: "reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily". --XRay 17:56, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
      There is nothing in the guidelines about requiring photos of subjects that can be photographed easily to have a much better resolution. This image is 3.35 MP, which is 1.675 times higher than the 2 MP minimum. What is a much better resolution anyway, 2× the minimum? 5×? Why not 10×? This is a very nebulous term, which we can't possibly use consistently. --СССР 19:44, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
       Comment The resolution of the iPhone 7 is 12 MP. This or a similar resolution would be acceptable for this kind of photograph. But the photographic quality of an iPhone 7 could be not good enough. If you like to discuss the guidelines, please use the discussion page. --XRay 05:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
      ✓ Done - resolution increased --СССР 03:16, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
       Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. It is not sharp enough. If you think, it is good enough, please change to discussion (consensual review). --XRay 04:33, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Unidentified Potentilla (cinquefoil) at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.--GT1976 14:02, 11 June 2019 (UTC) * Review Most yellow flowers are tricky to photograph. They have reflective membranes under the outer skin of the petals that shine in every kind of direct light. The blown out highlights are not very noticable here, but they are present. Can you do something about them? And how about a tighter crop? I think, the part of the flower at the left side of the picture and the bright spot of grass on the right distract the eye from the main feature of the photo. --Stoxastikos 17:44, 11 June 2019 (UTC) The plant looks like the shrub Dasiphora fruticosa (cultivated species). --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:28, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Unidentified Potentilla (cinquefoil) at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.--GT1976 14:02, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Review
      Most yellow flowers are tricky to photograph. They have reflective membranes under the outer skin of the petals that shine in every kind of direct light. The blown out highlights are not very noticable here, but they are present. Can you do something about them? And how about a tighter crop? I think, the part of the flower at the left side of the picture and the bright spot of grass on the right distract the eye from the main feature of the photo. --Stoxastikos 17:44, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
      The plant looks like the shrub Dasiphora fruticosa (cultivated species). --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:28, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kiirunavaara and Kiruna iron mine. --ArildV 09:08, 9 June 2019 (UTC) * Promotion It seems tilted - see the tower --Podzemnik 10:01, 9 June 2019 (UTC)  Done--ArildV 10:42, 15 June 2019 (UTC)@Podzemnik: --ArildV 07:35, 20 June 2019 (UTC)  Support The mentioned issue has been fixed, good quality. --Aristeas 16:51, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kiirunavaara and Kiruna iron mine. --ArildV 09:08, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Promotion
      It seems tilted - see the tower --Podzemnik 10:01, 9 June 2019 (UTC) ✓ Done--ArildV 10:42, 15 June 2019 (UTC)@Podzemnik: --ArildV 07:35, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
       Support The mentioned issue has been fixed, good quality. --Aristeas 16:51, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Consensual review[edit]

File:Liége,_la_Passerelle_Saucy_verlicht_in_de_avond_IMG_9709_2019-06-01_22.31.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Liége-Belgium, la Passerelle Saucy illuminated in the late evening --Michielverbeek 20:24, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment I have nominated yesterday six photos so I have replaced one to today --Michielverbeek 17:23, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose - Nicely atmospheric, but not sharp enough in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 21:45, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
     Comment - Whoever reset this from "Decline" to "Discuss" should please identify themselves and give an argument. Otherwise, I will reset it back to "Decline". -- Ikan Kekek 20:25, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
     Comment - In case it's not too late, I reset it to "Decline". Without a supporting vote or statement, this shouldn't be here. -- Ikan Kekek 05:44, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
     Comment Sorry, I did not realize that this was necessary because I simply don't agree with the decline. IMO it is sharp enough for QI. And I also would like to know what kind of a mistake I have made for this kind of unsharpness (f-value? exposure time? wrong focus? better camera?) and ofcourse I have used a tripod. Well I am not used to nominate a photo with such a long exposure time. --Michielverbeek 07:54, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
    OK, I've restored it to discuss. Yes, next time please make a statement that you are contesting the decline. I should say, I don't know what technical mistake you may have made; I only judge the result. Hopefully, someone else will be able to give you some suggestions. -- Ikan Kekek 09:06, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality IMO. In these conditions, picture taken in the late evening with a long time exposure, the quality is good enough for me --PJDespa 20:32, 22 June 2019 (UTC) 20:29, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality, for the same reasons. --TheSyndicate94 15:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
     Comment - Have you tried manual focus? It might yield even better results. Just in case you don't know this allready: when using a tripod turn of the image stabilizer and use the self timer (5s+) or remote shutter release when taking photos with a long exposure time. This is necessary when doing astrophotography. --TheSyndicate94 15:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:56, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Dülmen,_ehem._St.-Barbara-Kaserne_--_2019_--_6394.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Former barracks in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:20, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Dappled light. Poor composition. Sorry. --Stoxastikos 17:57, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Stoxastikos: It's an old, abandoned and unused building within the former barracks. The plants are growing up. The dappled light emphasizes the plants. Why do you think it's a poor composition? --XRay 15:40, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment @XRay: You ask why, in my opinion, this picture suffers from bad composition? Well, because it’s not beautiful. OK, OK, just kidding. I won’t touch on aesthetics here because, after all, it’s a subjective thing. Rather, technically speaking, I would claim that the photo represents the subject in a poor way. First of all, I (maybe naively) believe, that entire point of taking a picture is to tell a story or, if not, to convey a feeling. You say it’s an abandoned barracks, and I have no reason to disbelieve you. Sure it is. But how would I know it if you wouldn’t tell me? What’s so barracky about it? It’s just some wall that could belong to any building whatsoever. So, without your explanation I am not able to extract any meaning from the photo and thus can’t feel the desolation you are talking about. It’s hard for me to feel anything while looking at the plain brick wall. It’s a job of the photographer to find an angle at which the building would look forlorn and abandoned without any explanations. In other words, the picture should speak for itself. Second reason is perspective. Shooting through the canopy of the foliage in the sunny day while standing in shadow inevitably produces washed out sky. The result is usually made even more unnatural by the harsh contrast between the totally white background and darker leaves. Now, to the third point. Truth to be told, I don’t particularly care for your shooting the wall head on, so it looks completely flat, with no dimensions outside the classic Cartesian X and Y. I’d like to see at least some hint of Z, which would be possible only if the picture was taken from an angle. And, finally, about the dappled light. It does not emphasize the trees. To the contrary. It is very well known, that human eyes looking at any picture or painting go first to the brightest spot. That’s why many photographers use various techniques to switch the attention of the viewer to the most important part of the picture. Using vignetting, dodge and burn etc. they make the most important parts brighter and less important – darker. The dappled light acts effectively as a camouflage hiding the wall by forcing the eyes to wander choosing one of the multiple bright spots, of which the most are located in the sky here. Therefore the building remains the last to be seen. I sure may be wrong. It’s just my take from this particular picture. Stoxastikos 20:08, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Wrong or not, your answer is really good. I can follow your arguments, yes. The photo alone does not express it. I've taken a lot of photographs and hopefully they all together will express it. The photographs are used for a project of the history of the cold war. It's just an impression of the former barracks. Other photos may taken much easier, these one with the plants (and a lot of fences) not. But I didn't expected such answer, a really good explanation of your review. Thanks a lot! --XRay 08:18, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment @XRay: You are very welcome! If I may suggest a way to make this picture more telling even from this angle, you can try the following: come at night, when it's dark, place the camera on the tripod, make the exposure longer using ND filter or just close the aperture and lower the ISO, and then use some light painting concentrating on the window to create an impression of a slight glow emanating from the inside. After some trial and error it may turn out spooky enough to emphasize the full point: the war slowly fading away in the shadows of history. Stoxastikos 09:07, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry, but these photographs are used as a document for a project of the Cold War in the Münsterland. It would be too artifical for this project. But thank you for your ideas. --XRay 18:01, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good quality and an acceptable composition, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 00:39, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The picture with the disturbing shadows does not correspond to its description. -- Spurzem 16:51, 12 June 2019 (UTC) I change to  Neutral. Look below. -- Spurzem 16:18, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Spurzem: Why not? It's part of the barracks. --XRay 15:40, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
@XRay: Please do not mind me, but it is really only a very small part of the barracks, and the shadows and bushes are too disturbing to give an idea of the building. -- Spurzem 16:18, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
No problem, thank you. Some of the buildings are still in use (for companies and other), some are waiting for demolition - like this one. It's overgrown since a lot of years. --XRay 16:54, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan. --M@nfred (talk) 11:46, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan. --Aristeas 12:07, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 01:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_June_25_2019&oldid=524676194"