Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 29 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Paraphidippus_aurantius_male_01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Adult male Paraphidippus aurantius jumping spider in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania --Kaldari 20:53, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline

 Oppose DOF too low --Dirtsc 16:02, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
 Support I disagree, eyes are in focus, this is a outdoors photo of a live spider so focus stacking is impossible --Cvmontuy 00:32, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 Oppose - The eyes are haunting but the spider is not in focus. -- Ikan Kekek 06:19, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 Oppose as above, athough focus-stacking is certainly possible though difficult. Charlesjsharp 11:55, 25 July 2019 (UTC) Charlesjsharp 11:54, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 21:30, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

File:OutDoor_2018,_Friedrichshafen_(1X7A0535).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Model tent at OutDoor 2018 --MB-one 13:54, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Tilted --Poco a poco 20:55, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Try to cut a little on the left, maybe --Dktue 13:21, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Why do you move it to CR? if changes are applied I see no need to start a CR --Poco a poco 17:34, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Dktue, trimming the dark strip on the left would help but this image would still not be QI to me. --GRDN711 12:56, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  CommentDescription is lacking. Is it a modell on a cupboard?Tobias ToMar Maier 02:04, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perspective could probably be repaired, the horrible illumination not. --Smial 11:38, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - "Tent" is not a model (I don't understand how a cupboard is relevant to tents), and I don't really understand the strong opposition. This photo is hardly the best we'll ever see, but it's perfectly OK to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 14:28, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 21:30, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Hudson Pacemaker de 1950, Helsinki, Finlandia, 2012-08-14, DD 01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hudson Hornet of 1954, Helsinki, Finnland --Poco a poco 13:22, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:37, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The black grease on the bonnet (meanwhile removed), the blackened, probably already fictitious license plate and the information sheet in the windshield are very disturbing. Besides, the car is unnaturally distorted. For me, the photo would not be a quality picture. -- Spurzem 21:47, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment As it's obvious that you, Spurzem, cannot handle a criticism (or a contra to one of your images) I already stated, that I wouldn't review any of your images. I expect though the same from you otherwise I consider this a provocation! Don't play with me. Poco a poco 18:21, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ermell 07:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I must say that I find those black smudges a bit disturbing.--Peulle 08:03, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
    Peulle, one of them was there by mistake, I removed it. Poco a poco 18:13, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
  • OK, I still feel that the other one should be fixed too, though. What I mean by "fixed" is that if you're going to anonymize license plates, it should be done in a way that looks a bit more professional.--Peulle 13:49, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Peule. Also somewhat low DOF. --Smial 10:56, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Kaldari asked in the talk page of the file why I smudged the license plate. My motivation to do that was this, whether it's a must and why I cannot really say. Poco a poco 17:13, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
  • I don't object to the changing of license plates per se, but the way it has been done in this case.--Peulle 17:48, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support --Tournasol7 06:45, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
    • Please provide a reason. --Smial 11:16, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Question was ist mit dem Nummernschild passiert? Irgendwie zu weitwinklig... --Ralf Roletschek 21:42, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment The image looks good to me overall. As for the plates: the background of the frame is gray with the (presumably) white letters and numbers. If that particular shade of gray was used instead of black to cover the symbols, the result would be much more pleasing to the eye. Just my two cents. --Stoxastikos 16:50, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Spurzem. --Kallerna 07:23, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 21:28, 28 July 2019 (UTC)