Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 22 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Audi_A3_8Y_45_TFSI_e_IMG_4931.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Audi A3 PHEV in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 16:35, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Informative, but image quality probably limited by the lens used. --Nefronus 21:37, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 08:05, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ermell. -- Ikan Kekek 00:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 14:29, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Mercedes-Benz V223 IMG 4946.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz S 350d in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 16:33, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Informative, but image quality probably limited by the lens used. --Nefronus 21:37, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose Not sharp enough IMO. Sorry. --Ermell 08:04, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose per Ermell. -- Ikan Kekek 00:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 14:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

File:AUT_vs._TUR_2016-03-29_(138).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Ramazan Özcan, goalkeeper of Austria. --Steindy 00:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Review
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:52, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose The focal plane is on the left ear, sorry. --Nefronus 04:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Yes, left ear!Do you mean the left ear of the player, or the on the photo? --Steindy 15:10, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Of the player. --Nefronus 05:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support For a sports photo QI --Moroder 02:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is a sports photo, but not really an "action shot" as the player seems to be standing still. Therefore not sharp enough imo. --Peulle 14:32, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Oh yeah Peulle, if the goalie catches the ball, that's really not in action. Thank you for your vote! --Steindy 15:10, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Let’s stay objective and avoid comments that might look like sarcasm. --Nefronus 05:25, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
  • No goalkeeper catches the ball like that. He's holding it with his palms facing down, pushing his hands inward. This means he has already caught it and is now controlling the ball. The angles of his shoulders also indicate an upright stance, meaning he is standing, not running. My vote stands. --Peulle 09:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support--Commonists 16:32, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I love his facial expression but agree with Peulle. -- Ikan Kekek 00:06, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 14:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Corps_Rhenania_in_Tübingen.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: One of the many frat houses in Tübingen --Dktue 11:08, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Review  Oppose Composition: Very unfortunate crop at the bottom. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:52, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
    Good point, I hate the crop myself but unfortunately there was an air-conditioning-unit on another roof in the view. This is the biggest crop that excludes this disturbing detail. Shoud I crop even tighter? --Dktue 09:07, 7 July 2021 (UTC)  Comment The status was already "declined". If you have objections, the usual procedure is to send the image to discussion space, not to reset to state "promotion". With respect to your question: May be a tighter crop above could restore the balance of the composition. --Johannes Robalotoff 19:15, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
    I agree with this suggestion. -- Ikan Kekek 07:32, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
     Support The cutted wooden house is not beautyful, but the photo otherwise is very good. You shouldn't look for mosquitoes, but reward your good work. --Steindy 00:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
    •  Comment I don't think that we are talking about a mosquito-like issue here, as as long as it is obvious even in the thumbnail view of the image. I can understand the reasons why the framing has been chosen in that way during shooting. I have been in such situations too. But in the result, if not a good portion of the sky is cropped, the image looks too awkward IMHO to be a QI. --Johannes Robalotoff 19:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC) .
  •  Support --Commonists 19:39, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Johannes Robalotoff. --Nefronus 21:24, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:40, 21 July 2021 (UTC)