Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 21 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:St._Remaclus_Waldorf_(2019-07-14_Sp).JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Saint Remaclus, statue in the parish church of Waldorf in Vinxtbachtal Spurzem 17:58, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose It lacks sharpness to me, sorry --Poco a poco 20:55, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
    This may be due to your eyes. Or is it a return coach? I ask for discussion. -- Spurzem 21:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
     Support This is not an excellente picture, but a QI for me. --Manfred Kuzel 09:01, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. It looks like slight motion blur, but it is still good enough to be printed in A4 format (or letter size). Lothar: Please don't complain almost every time that somebody wants to personally hit you when pictures of you get a "contra". You know how much I appreciate your photographic contributions here, but a little more calmness would greatly improve the discussion climate. -- Smial 09:40, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
    • Don't worry, Smial, it was the last time I reviewed a image of Spurzem. I saw yesterday, that I had promoted 2 of this last 4 QIs. No complaints there, but here after I felt this image is at the same time small and blurry. Will not make a theater out of it but I prefer exchanging reviews with users who can come along with them, independently of pros or contras. Poco a poco 10:55, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The eyes are not sharp enough for QI IMO, Do we have a more precise sharpness criteria or it depends completely on perception and taste of the reviewer?, --Cvmontuy 00:25, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
    @Cvmontuy: My impression, but which can be wrong: The assessment depends exclusively on the individual's feelings as well as on sympathy and antipathy. Objective criteria obviously play a minor role here. Look to your votes above. -- Spurzem 07:20, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
@Spurzem: , that is why I am asking, must of the time my votes are based just on if I like or not a picture, (not in the author) but still subjetive, and many times I'll would like to have a more objective procedures.--Cvmontuy 12:20, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
@Cvmontuy: Your reviews currently seem to depend on your personal feelings indeed and not due to comprehensible criteria. That's not good as I think. -- Spurzem 13:50, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This is not sharp.--Peulle 06:44, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others --Uoaei1 08:44, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 21:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)