Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 2009

• 
  • Nomination Kew Gardens Palm House, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 06:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion perfect --Mbdortmund 08:44, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vanessa cardui on Buddleja davidii --Böhringer 20:24, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Correct. --ComputerHotline 07:06, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cyrtacanthacridinae, american Bird Grasshopper, also known as the American Grasshopper. Green Swamp, Florida. Author: Tomfriedel --Lmbuga 19:44, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good enough. --Marcok 07:41, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Colias phicomone on Arnica montana --Böhringer 19:39, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Correct. --ComputerHotline 07:06, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wizz Air's Airbus 320 (HA-LPF) landing. --Airwolf 19:28, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Like it, especially the engine air --Schlurcher 21:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inachis io on Astrantia major --Böhringer 18:37, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Correct. --ComputerHotline 07:06, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weston-super-Mare railway station. Mattbuck 17:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Main Objekt too dark --Schlurcher 21:06, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weston-super-Mare railway station. Mattbuck 17:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline No good composition --Schlurcher 21:06, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weston Milton railway station. Mattbuck 17:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Nothing really sharp --Schlurcher 21:06, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weston Milton railway station. Mattbuck 17:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Main Objekt noisy and not sharp, ground also not so pretty. --Schlurcher 21:06, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Melbourne skyline from Rialto, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 06:54, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great! - Till.niermann 16:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination State Library of Victoria, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 06:54, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Really great image. --Carport 18:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aialik glacier --Ianare 20:39, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Uneven sky hue, especially at top right, stitching visible at the sea due to varying focus between the shots. --Ferengi 11:00, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
    Thanks I will try to fix stitch error and re-submit. The sky was like that though. --Ianare 17:14, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oxeye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare). --kallerna 13:41, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline I just love the composition! I wish there were more variety and interest in composition, especially for plants. This one is great! However . . . so little focus on the flower. :-( :-( So sorry. Maedin 18:04, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Phalasarna (Crete, Greece): ancient ruins -- MJJR 21:03, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Informative, good quality. -- Smial 12:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monastery of Chrysoskalitissa (Crete, Greece) -- MJJR 21:03, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Slightly overexposed, but still very good. -- Smial 12:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Nephila inaurata madagascariensis from Madagascar --Bgag 23:16, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The B4465 bridge over the Severn beach Line in Bristol. Mattbuck 22:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Stapleton Road railway station in Bristol. Mattbuck 22:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Disused bridge at Stapleton Road railway station in Bristol. Mattbuck 22:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Hagen (Germany), LWL-Freilichtmuseum, Haus Vorster -- MJJR 20:53, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. -- Smial 15:07, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Agraulis vanillae caterpillar before loosing its skin and becoming a pupa -- Korall 19:41, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Pupa of the butterfly Agraulis vanillae -- Korall 19:41, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sympetrum sanguineum --ComputerHotline 14:21, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Hemaris fuciformis --ComputerHotline 14:21, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Demänovka stream, Low Tatras, Slovakia --Pudelek 10:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice view, but too high jpg compression, strong artefacts. Watch the trunks of the trees in middle background. A jpg with 5 MPix, showing as many details usually has a file size of 2 MByte or more. Please consider using quality=fine resp. quality=high in your camera settings. Also some CA, which I tried to reduce somewhat. -- Smial 22:11, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ship model of the ship Belem --Schlurcher 14:49, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good Quality --Afrank99 19:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lemur Catta, Madagascar --Bgag 15:30, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Not very detailled, resolution at lower limit, CA. --Afrank99 19:25, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Miotte tower, near Belfort, in France. --ComputerHotline 21:17, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Ferengi 11:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A544 Alholm. Minor Danish naval ship used for training cadets. --Slaunger 19:56, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Seems OK. Airwolf 20:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Typical medieval quarter in Porto, Portugal. Alvesgaspar 16:14, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline CA at the roof, underexposed sections at the bottom --Ferengi 11:39, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A cloth merchant with his merchandise. Porto, Portugal. -- Alvesgaspar 12:12, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --Ferengi 11:39, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clothes in a cloth store. Porto, Portugal. -- Alvesgaspar 12:12, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion There is some ghosting in the left chain, but overall nice colors and composition. --Ferengi 11:39, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Palazzo del Capitaniato in Vicenza is one of the most important works of architect Andrea Palladio. --Marcok 10:42, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Shadows are to dark --Berthold Werner 11:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Iphiclides podalirius --ComputerHotline 09:24, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Good art work, but not sharp. -- Smial 15:54, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The rear garden of Villa Emo, in Fanzolo di Vedelago, Italy. --Marcok 00:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Textbook perspective. --Ferengi 11:26, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Salzburg pano, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 06:51, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 12:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, a bay window at Ebrach abbay --Berthold Werner 07:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Slightly noisy at the top, but generally OK. --Ferengi 11:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Asphalt concrete. --kallerna 10:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Nizke Tatry (Low Tatras) - peak Krúpova hoľa --Pudelek 10:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Low Tatras - yellow trail blazing from sedlo Javorie to Krúpova hoľa --Pudelek 10:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Low Tatras - yellow trail blazing from sedlo Javorie to Krúpova hoľa --Pudelek 10:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: A Black-crowned Night Heron looking for some fish. Dori 00:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Bench in near shore of Linnakepuisto in Reposaari, Pori, Finland. --kallerna 12:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: House of Marin-Marie on Chausey Island, France.--LPLT 14:12, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Argiope bruennichi from France.--LPLT 14:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Kissamos (Greece): outdoor restaurant -- MJJR 20:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion a bit boring, but technically good --Mbdortmund 12:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Thrift (armeria maritima) --Ankara 00:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Overexposed sky, would have been good with dark background. -- Smial 22:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panorama of Athens, Greece --Ferengi 21:59, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion stiching problems see near the "amcor" tank in the foreground about a third into the picture from the left. Light intensity shifts across the sky (diagonal lines) caused by software when creating pano. Gnangarra 13:56, 24 July 2009 (UTC)  Comment Restitched image with latest version of Photomerge, hopefully all artifacts gone. Please re-evaluate. --Ferengi 16:45, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
    Issues fix looks good Gnangarra 01:39, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination a Silver crystal --Alchemist-hp 20:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice picture. --Marcok 01:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Swaledale sheep, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 13:24, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --kallerna 14:48, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trafalgar Square, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 13:24, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good! --Marcok 01:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Sommerhausen, Würzburg gate --Berthold Werner 09:05, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good, but please consider RAW, the pentax tool is able to correct CA :-) -- Smial 00:22, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination King crab (Lithodes santolla) (Tierra del Fuego, Patagonia) --Butterfly voyages 05:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nicely done --Ianare 18:39, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dryas julia --Böhringer 20:03, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quite shallow DOF and may need a new crop, but still QI. --kallerna 16:43, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Washington Monument, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 10:30, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion although it is already excellent on de, it looks a bit tiltet to the right for me. --Mbdortmund 17:16, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
    Hmmm, I'm not sure it is. I tried correcting it to the left by 0.1 or 0.2, and then it seemed tilted to the left for me. I'm sure the angles/lines on the monument are just creating a trick for the eyes, :-) Maedin 13:20, 26 July 2009 (UTC) Maybe you are right and it is QI anyway. I had a try here by using the vertical frontline as orientation, it was only some millimeters tilited to the right. I will delete my try later to prevent duplicating --Mbdortmund 09:35, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pylon and wind turbines in rural regions in Bavaria. --High Contrast 16:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Artefacts from sharpening, perspective distorted, slightly overexposed and oversaturated. And: Very small turbines :-) -- Smial 01:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Anisoptera sp. head. --ComputerHotline 20:38, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  CommentFLICKR sourced Gnangarra 14:16, 24 July 2009 (UTC) ---- Like all of my images. --ComputerHotline 17:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)}
    QI, the author is a Wikipedian --Mbdortmund 09:57, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Swizz cow near Oeschinensee Lake. --Slaunger 21:53, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion only name of the cow is missing --Mbdortmund 03:13, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
    Yes, I've asked about the cow breed at the en reference desk, and it seems like it is the en:Fleckvieh cattle breed. I'll update the page description when I am sure. --Slaunger 10:18, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monastery of Chrysoskalitissa (Crete, Greece): entrance gate. -- MJJR 19:04, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good colors --Böhringer 21:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination PZL-101 Gawron, a Polish agricultural and utility aircraft --Airwolf 14:34, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --Ianare 20:37, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A purple martin in flight with a dragonfly. Dori 00:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good --Ianare 20:35, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the river Douro and D. Luís bridge. Porto, Portugal. -- Alvesgaspar 16:12, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice --Ianare 20:35, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Solaris Center - Opole (Oppeln), Upper Silesia --Pudelek 08:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Solaris Center - Opole (Oppeln), Upper Silesia --Pudelek 08:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Solaris Center - Opole (Oppeln), Upper Silesia --Pudelek 08:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Solaris Center - Opole (Oppeln), Upper Silesia --Pudelek 08:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Solaris Center - Opole (Oppeln), Upper Silesia --Pudelek 08:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Germany, Bacharach, Sickingen house --Berthold Werner 06:34, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: A Tettigoniidae on a kale leaf. I don't know exactly to what subfamily the Tettigoniidae belongs to. --Vittau 01:18, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Branta leucopsis --Korall 22:21, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --Ianare 20:32, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Branta leucopsis --Korall 22:21, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Not sharp enough --Ianare 20:32, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Great Seal of the State of Rhode Island --Svgalbertian 22:25, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion well done. --Afrank99 09:53, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Finnish police car. --kallerna 13:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Panning did not work as visual effect, so it looks unsharp, not catched in a fast movement. -- Smial 00:12, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Onnenkoski-rapid. --kallerna 09:04, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Well done. -- Smial 00:13, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination PZL-130 Orlik seen from the top. --Airwolf 08:45, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Unfortunately the attempt to mend the underexposure of the original, led to a myriad of compression artifacts on the plane. --Ferengi 19:34, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lion of Belfort. --ComputerHotline 08:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok. --kallerna 13:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eastern American Toad --Cephas 00:14, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Bit noisy, but still QI. --kallerna 16:12, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sympetrum sanguineum --ComputerHotline 14:21, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok. --kallerna 13:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hemaris fuciformis --ComputerHotline 14:21, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Nothing is really is focus. The another version is better. --kallerna 15:43, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Evening shot of fishing buoy at sea state zero in Køge Bay, Denmark --Slaunger 13:16, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Main subject is too small, blurry & noisy. Otherwise nice artsy composition. --kallerna 12:07, 24 July 2009 (UTC)  Comment Understood, thanks for reviewing. --Slaunger 12:11, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fireweed (Epilobium angustifolium). --kallerna 17:46, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice composition good dof Gnangarra 14:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shore near Linnakepuisto, Reposaari, Pori, Finland. --kallerna 17:40, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion some chromatic abberation on the rocks bottom right its minor Gnangarra 14:10, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meri-Porin lukio high school. --kallerna 08:53, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline centre of the image the large wall isnt aligned and the top left side from the stitch isnt focused, also blurred pleants on the left. nice composition though and good presentation of a blan subject Gnangarra 14:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
     Comment Thanks for review, I'll try it again someday! --kallerna 14:59, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination dead tree by M-J --Mbdortmund 00:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice composition itd make an interesting foreground for a sunset/sunrise Gnangarra 14:19, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chevrolet Apache, Tel-Aviv, Israel. -- Rastaman3000 16:03, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline chromatic aberration around chrome areas and across roof of the vehicle, combined with the background clutter Gnangarra 13:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Celtic statue in Hirschlanden --Harke 14:07, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion a little rigid/central composition but detail and lighting compensate Gnangarra 13:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spines of West European Hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus). --kallerna 19:56, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Please review. --kallerna 12:06, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
    decline composition,DOF make this a hard image to observe, suggest File:Spines of Erinaceus europaeus.JPG as a better presentation Gnangarra 13:27, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brassica rapa. --kallerna 19:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Please review. --kallerna 12:06, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
    flower color washed out, petal detail lost Gnangarra 13:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Glebionis coronaria. --MathKnight 15:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good detail, ok DOF Gnangarra 13:34, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Four-spotted Chaser (Libellula quadrimaculata). --kallerna 08:22, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Correct. --ComputerHotline 08:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lightning in Dörflingen --Simisa 20:37, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Some spots in the sky (birds?), which you better remove. Cropping a little bit of the foreground will probably also improve the result. Otherwise very good lightning picture! -- MJJR 21:11, 23 July 2009 (UTC)  Support Please do not remove the birds, but I agree about the foreground. Yann 21:18, 23 July 2009 (UTC)  Comment Foreground is cropped now - looks really better -- Simisa 07:40, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Patrouille de France during Bastille Day 2009. —Dimitri Torterat 21:35, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Sorry, but no. The right hand plane has its tail cut. Airwolf 19:59, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common Grackle --Cephas 12:27, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline branchs in front of bird. --Makele-90 23:29, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bibury Cottages, Cotswolds, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 10:30, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI! --Berthold Werner 12:08, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunset in Camiguin, Philippines --VladRud 02:38, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Beautiful. Could use some sharpening though. Mattbuck 15:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Libellula quadrimaculata --ComputerHotline 20:34, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline That stalk obscures part of the head, which is the center of the composition, and especially since it's out of focus has a distracting effect. --Ferengi 21:55, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red Holstein --Böhringer 20:24, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
    for me a bit too dark --Mbdortmund 23:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Indeed a bit dark, but wouldn't call it underexposed. --Ferengi 21:50, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of River Nabão, Tomar, Prtugal -- Alvesgaspar 19:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
    Tilted, you should fix that. -- H005 21:31, 16 July 2009 (UTC).  Done Alvesgaspar 07:58, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --Ferengi 21:52, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detmold (Germany), LWL-Freilichtmuseum, view through the window of the Haus Uhlmann -- MJJR 20:53, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion I like it --Mbdortmund 21:31, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Agraulis vanillae butterfly showing upside or wings-- Korall 19:41, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 21:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cynthia cardui --ComputerHotline 14:21, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good! --kallerna 15:14, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cynthia cardui --ComputerHotline 14:21, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good! --kallerna 15:14, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Helophilus pendulus. --kallerna 10:53, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 14:50, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination German chamomile (Matricaria recutita). --kallerna 10:42, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 15:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old, used asphalt-pavement. --kallerna 10:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Pinprick detail and no noise. — Daniel Case 15:53, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Karen Padaung girl, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 06:38, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion really good --Mbdortmund 21:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gothic church in Brewster, NY — Daniel Case 04:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)~
  • Decline Colours are oversaturated and perspective should be corrected. --Berthold Werner 08:45, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Great Egret in the Horicon Marsh. Dori 00:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 12:04, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spider Argiope bruennichi, female. ----Lucarelli 23:52, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice. Maedin 12:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kissamos (Greece): seascape with shed -- MJJR 20:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion someway a terrible place but good composition and it is good to show those places, too --Mbdortmund 12:12, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The aqueduct of Pegões, Tomar, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 20:13, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Bit dizzy, but great light and composition. But it's tilted, can you fix that please? -- H005 21:28, 16 July 2009 (UTC).  Done Alvesgaspar 07:58, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
    file not displayed here --Mbdortmund 22:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
    Some CA, and looks like heavy noise removal has been applied. But overall a promote. Maedin 12:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Radcliffe Camera, Oxford, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 06:38, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion very good --Pudelek 10:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Great Egret perching on a branch. Dori 00:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good details, colours and composition --Mbdortmund 12:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close up of a purple martin with a dragonfly. Dori 00:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good work --Mbdortmund 11:56, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manhattan Bridge, NYC, higher quality reupload, tilted 1.9 CW --VladRud 17:23, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Too much noise and compression artifacts in the sky, tilted. BTW check your quality setting, there's no way an ISO 80 photo can have that much noise at high quality. --Ferengi 17:42, 21 July 2009 (UTC) Comment Noise is gone, but still tilted. Rotate 1,9° CW and reupload and you'll get my vote. --Ferengi 19:50, 21 July 2009 (UTC) Good enough now :) --Ferengi 03:58, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Milestone in Madagascar --Bgag 13:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Painterly in detail and composition. —Daniel Case 04:29, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Ebrach abbey, Pentecost Miracle --Berthold Werner 12:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK --Mbdortmund 23:58, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Illuminated underground --ComputerHotline 21:17, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Amazing colors and detail, good perspective. --Ferengi 19:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bruges (Belgium): the Poertoren, part of the medieval ramparts -- MJJR 20:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK. --Berthold Werner 12:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A wind turbine. This photo was taken up from air. During a flight from Braunschweig to Hildesheim (in Germany, Lower Saxony). --PhilipMay 15:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice --Schlurcher 14:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Italian Market, Philadelphia --Massimo Catarinella 21:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality Dori 00:46, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Thunderstorm in Annemasse, France. Yann 14:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion The lights at the bottom are a bit distracting, and the photo is by no means perfect. I know from experience however that lightning shots are extremely difficult, so I'll promote this. Juliancolton 02:39, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The moon, aligned with a building. --Eusebius 19:47, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Quality is good, though I would have cut off more of the sky from the top for a better composition. Dori 00:42, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Giant Sequoia --JalalV 04:31, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Significant purple fringing. I don't know if better lighting would have been possible or not, but I'm guessing a better image could have been made. Dori 00:42, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old boat at Dungeness, Kent. Maedin 18:51, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose I think the composition isn't as good as it could be (needs more space around the subject, and there are stitching problems. Why did you make a stitch of this by the way? A single shot would have been more than sufficient for this subject. Dori 00:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
    Thanks for your comments, Dori. I do have it as a single shot. I stitched it just for practice! Obviously not that successful, ;-) Maedin 06:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Metternich Castle in Beilstein at the river Mosel --Berthold Werner 16:45, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support I would have used closed down the aperture a bit more, but I think it's good enough. Dori 00:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former schoolhouse in Ditzingen --Harke 21:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion came here to nominate this picture... --Mbdortmund 22:57, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Racing car: Porsche 997 GT3 Cup-- Curnen 20:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 09:09, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rana clamitans by Cephas --Mbdortmund 17:02, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good dept of field, at eye level.Curnen 21:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winter view of Ankara seen from Beytepe Campus (Hacettepe University)--Ankara 00:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Bad composition: the tree is right in the middle. Yann 14:50, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flatruet (a low swedish mountins) in the late evning --Ankara 00:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Lower half underexposed, general lack of detail (maybe even motion blur). --Ferengi 15:45, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Its not underexposed, the shadow from the mountins make it darker, its the true colours of the place. The photos is taken in the late evning (almost 10 pm) You do not have a lot of details on barren tableland--Ankara 15:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)I know it's a shadow, it's still called underexposure. It was your choice to frame the photo this way and shoot at that hour and you ended up with a nearly featureless foreground. Try increasing the gamma and see how much more interesting the photo becomes.--Ferengi 17:07, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Münster (Germany): Liebfrauen-Überwasserkirche -- MJJR 20:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Excellent detail. --Ferengi 13:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano --Blackfalcon 18:15, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Up close it lacks fine detail, but color saturation is good, framing and perspective is good and given that this was a car in motion, probably shot from another moving vehicle, I vote yes. --Ferengi 20:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The courthouse in Tours. --Eusebius 17:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Underexposed for the subject. Maedin 12:11, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Head of Nova Scotia Duck-Tolling Retriever. --kallerna 17:08, 18 July 2009 (UTC))
  • Promotion Good colours, the part of the head facing the camera is in good enough focus IMO. --Jolly Janner 14:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maritime theater at the villa Adriana in Tivoli--LPLT 11:51, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline really sad, but the sky is really terrible (colours, overexposured) --Mbdortmund 12:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Jardin du Luxembourg in Paris during the winter--LPLT 11:59, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline good concept, but the building in the background is overexposured --Mbdortmund 12:21, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rheintal --Böhringer 21:50, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice colors, good detail, good framing (slight tilt, but can probably be attributed to wide angle perspective distortion) --Ferengi 13:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Corridor of the north entrance in the Salbert fortifications. --ComputerHotline 11:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great detail, nice green tint. --Ferengi 06:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
• * Nomination Ads on Times Square, NY --Tiago Fioreze 08:44, 16 July 2009 (UTC) * Decline Blurred. --Ferengi 06:20, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Ads on Times Square, NY --Tiago Fioreze 08:44, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Blurred. --Ferengi 06:20, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Towers of Saint-Pierre cathedral, Geneva. Yann 20:44, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline too dark --Mbdortmund 09:51, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint-Pierre cathedral, Geneva. Yann 20:13, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion people in front distorted during postprocessing, should be corrected. --Mbdortmund 00:12, 15 July 2009 (UTC)  Comment Corrected. Yann 17:47, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
    OK --Mbdortmund 09:51, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Garden City Lands in Richmond BC. --BlueSquadronRaven 17:05, 13 July 2009 (UTC)  Question What is Garden City Lands? To me it lokks just like a bit of dry and boring grassland, but maybe I'm missing something. -- H005 19:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
     Comment It's an undeveloped parcel of land in the middle of Richmond, BC which has become a point of contention between Citizens who want it left as wetlands/peatbog or turned to community gardens and the City and local aboriginals who want to develop it. I uploaded it for the city's article on Wikipedia. --BlueSquadronRaven 20:34, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Overexposed sky, mundane subject, slightly tilted horizon. --Ferengi 11:53, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
     Comment The horizon is not tilted. That's the lay of the land. --BlueSquadronRaven 16:34, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
     CommentGranted, but that's the least of the photo's problems. --Ferengi 17:02, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
     CommentRealistically, you've only cited one issue... the sky. That at least I'll go along with.--BlueSquadronRaven 21:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panoramic view of the Alexander Springs within the Ocala National Forest. --Óðinn 05:22, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Too much noise in the sky, lack of detail throughout the photo. --Ferengi 08:50, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Satyrium calanus nectaring on Asclepias syriaca --Meganmccarty 22:27, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Correct. --ComputerHotline 09:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eurytides marcellus laying an egg on Asimina triloba --Meganmccarty 22:27, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Correct. --ComputerHotline 09:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Anisoptera sp. is going out his exuvia. --ComputerHotline 20:38, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion More or less flawless. --Ferengi 08:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hagen (Germany): LWL-Freilichtmuseum -- MJJR 20:26, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 06:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Münster (Germany): St Paul's cathedral -- MJJR 20:26, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 06:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bruges (Belgium): the Minnewater -- MJJR 20:26, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 06:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Slide tray --Harke 18:14, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks OK. Lycaon 18:51, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vaults of Tours cathedral. --Eusebius 16:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion High quality, good angle. --MathKnight 16:30, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 2009/Decline
• 
  • Nomination Hot air balloon in flight. Juliancolton 13:29, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Low noise, good detail. Subject a bit common, but why not? --Ferengi 16:39, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Guardian lions and Zhaobi outside of Daci temple in Chengdu,Sichuan Province,China --Charlie fong 10:11, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Chromatic aberration at foliage on top, high noise reduction destroys fine detail, oversaturated colors. --Ferengi 06:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Satmahal Prasada, Polonnaruwa, Sri Lanka --Bgag 00:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Sky is overexposed, but main subject is already slightly underexposed, so this is probably the best possible balance for given lighting conditions. --Ferengi 06:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: University of Cologne, pano of the Main Building --S^[1] 21:10, 13 July 2009 (UTC)~
  • Review  Question What are these strange colour patterns on the windows to the top left? -- H005 21:31, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The Kremlin of Volokolamsk, --High Contrast 20:55, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review  Neutral Very blurry and chromatic aberrations on the left side, otherwise good -- H005 21:23, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Creeping Thistle (Cirsium arvense). --kallerna 16:53, 13 July 2009 (UTC)  Comment Please review. --kallerna 07:47, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice colors, good detail, great framing. --Ferengi 23:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bruges (Belgium): the Smeden Gate -- MJJR 20:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Wenn Du das Raw noch hast, hell doch die Schatten ein wenig auf, aber auch sonst gut --Mbdortmund 22:02, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hagen (Germany): the LWL-Freilichtmuseum -- MJJR 20:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. -- Smial 01:26, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Creeping Bellflower (Campanula rapunculoides). --kallerna 17:22, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very nice. Maedin 18:47, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Calliphora vomitoria. --kallerna 17:01, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 22:06, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Addersmeat (Stellaria holostea). --kallerna 16:59, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline DOF is too shallow. Only small areas of either bloom is in focus. Maedin 18:47, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination a pure chemical element: Titanium crystal bar --Alchemist-hp 14:50, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --kallerna 17:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Medium wave transmitter --Harke 14:13, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok. -- Smial 01:26, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lighthouse at Port Adelaide, South Australia. --Peripitus 12:24, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good enough for me --George Chernilevsky 13:58, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination SlowGang performing in Pori Jazz -Nova stage. --kallerna 10:21, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Lot of detail invisible on black, overcontrasted --George Chernilevsky 13:58, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Bacharach at the rhine, Market street and Market tower --Berthold Werner 17:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Location is difficult for photographers, under these conditions good illustration. --Smial 00:55, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A frog (Rana perezi) -- Alvesgaspar 00:26, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 22:10, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yamaha XS 650 - Rama 12:44, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline not displayed here --Mbdortmund 22:11, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
    Blown BG, lots of CA. (File may be corrupt however.). Lycaon 00:58, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Petunia (Petunia x hybrida). --kallerna 06:32, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Difficult reds again. 7.4% of the image is blown in the red channel. Lycaon 07:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
     Info I uploaded new version. Any better now? --kallerna 07:58, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
    Yes ;-). Lycaon 11:28, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gargoyle in front of Philadelphia Museum of Art. --Jarekt 03:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Slightly soft, fails to fully convey the true texture of the object. Faint chromatic aberration at top left corner. --Ferengi 08:37, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volucella pellucens on Swamp Cinquefoil. --kallerna 17:32, 13 July 2009 (UTC)  Comment Please review. --kallerna 07:47, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Beautiful color palette, nice framing, good detail. --Ferengi 08:21, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Swamp Cinquefoil (Potentilla palustris). --kallerna 16:43, 13 July 2009 (UTC)  Comment Please review. --kallerna 07:47, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice colors, but there is slight motion blur at full resolution which reduces fine detail. Also lower right bud is in focus but cropped, so framing is thrown off balance. --Ferengi 11:49, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bombus lucorum. --kallerna 12:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)  Comment Please review. --kallerna 07:47, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Motion blur in antenna and leg, body of insect slightly underexposed. --Ferengi 08:21, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The wasp spider Argiope bruennichi --George Chernilevsky 10:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Cliffs near Bonifacio (France) BartekPtaszyński 14:51, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Detail is good, but framing is off, especially the cropping of the left edge of the cliff. --Ferengi 08:01, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gaschem Jümme, semi-refrigerated LPG / Ammonia / VCM- Carrier. --Dschwen 04:26, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Thou it would be better with tighter crop. --kallerna 10:22, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination West European Hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus). --kallerna 19:53, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion very good --George Chernilevsky 20:59, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination West European Hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus). --kallerna 19:53, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Lovely, well done. Yann 20:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Small Tortoiseshell (Nymphalis urticae). --kallerna 19:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Correct --ComputerHotline 08:59, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Small Tortoiseshell (Nymphalis urticae). --kallerna 19:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --Böhringer 21:32, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Skyline of Philadelphia --Massimo Catarinella 14:40, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice panorama. --kallerna 20:00, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pori town hall. --kallerna 09:10, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion tilt, correct please -- George Chernilevsky 13:47, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
     Info Sorry, fixed! --kallerna 17:03, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
    Now Ok -- George Chernilevsky 21:07, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shrine of the Báb --JalalV 02:11, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Underexposed. --Afrank99 12:38, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Isarursprung, Scharnitz, Austria - The place where the river Isar arises from Richard Bartz 16:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nearly to kitschy ;) --AngMoKio 19:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wehranlage- Grosshesselohe, Munich, Germany Richard Bartz 16:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion sure thing --AngMoKio 19:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wehranlage- Grosshesselohe, Munich, Germany Richard Bartz 16:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion solid work --AngMoKio 19:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ismaninger Speichersee, Munich, Germany Richard Bartz 16:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion solid work --AngMoKio 19:56, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Riverpowerplant Höllriegelskreuth, Munich, Germany Richard Bartz 16:38, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion solid work --AngMoKio 19:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old church in Mogielnica (Poland) BartekPtaszyński 14:51, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Weak  Oppose: Good picture, but unfortunately foggy and IMHO it would have been better to shoot from more to the left so that you could also see the roof. -- H005 19:46, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
     Oppose foggy and not sharp for me -- George Chernilevsky 16:04, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gämse, Rupicapra rupicapra --Böhringer 21:34, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion geiles Bild, ich würd die Schatten etwas aufhellen, aber das ist sicher Geschmackssache --Mbdortmund 22:57, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tabanus bovinus head. --ComputerHotline 20:34, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline It would be nice, to find a link to the commons-account in the Description, not only for the QI-Bot. --Mbdortmund 22:59, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
    Undersized. Lycaon 07:23, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gonepteryx rhamni. --ComputerHotline 20:34, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --Böhringer 21:38, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Libellula quadrimaculata --ComputerHotline 20:34, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --George Chernilevsky 07:55, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Libellula quadrimaculata --ComputerHotline 20:34, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good showing wings --George Chernilevsky 07:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Libellula quadrimaculata --ComputerHotline 20:34, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks ok to me. --Eusebius 21:13, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sympetrum vulgatum, a dragonfly --Korall 19:54, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --ComputerHotline 20:34, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Satamaito-milk truck. --kallerna 17:36, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline unfortunate illumination, part of truck too dark. -- George Chernilevsky 06:27, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Green iguana --Korall 11:07, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Not sharp (particularly the head). Lycaon 14:07, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
    ... whic is a pity, because colours and composition are great, but the lack of sharpness spoils all that. -- H005 19:58, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panoramic view of the Calico Hills at the Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area Area. --Óðinn 04:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice image. --High Contrast 07:06, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chipping Sparrow by Cephas --Mbdortmund 22:36, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Looks good in thumb but is not at all sharp, even the head is slightly OOF. Lycaon 07:25, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A new version, better light and higher resolution--Charlie fong 15:43, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Not so shar, noisy, bad geometry (leaning towers), perhaps JPEG artefacts in the sky. --Eusebius 21:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canary Wharf, London, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 11:46, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK now. Lycaon 07:26, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Australian War Memorial, Canberra --Cflm001 08:14, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Overexposed sky. --Eusebius 20:23, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pedicularis foliosa --Böhringer 21:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. Maedin 18:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination UAZ-452 used in EMS Ukraine --George Chernilevsky 10:53, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Neutral Technically good, the background is a pity. -- H005 18:04, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
     Support Meets the criteria for QI in any aspects. --High Contrast 07:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lysimachia vulgaris. --kallerna 16:23, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Would prefer more of the plant to be in focus, but it's acceptable. Maedin 18:44, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common Blue (Polyommatus icarus). --kallerna 16:17, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Correct. --ComputerHotline 17:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Helophilus pendulus. --kallerna 12:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Correct. --ComputerHotline 17:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Leaves and flower of the water lily -- MJJR 20:50, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Yerpo 06:17, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination West European Hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus). --kallerna 13:06, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion picture leans to red, IMO --Mbdortmund 02:29, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
     Info Colours adjusted. Any better now? --kallerna 06:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
    YES --Mbdortmund 23:03, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hydrangea macrophylla 'Endless Summer' --Captain-tucker 21:10, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Noisy, slight CA. --Eusebius 20:54, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brooklyn Bridge, New York City, New York, USA Tfioreze 20:39, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion --H005 22:46, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Indian Peafowl -- Albertus teolog 17:23, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --George Chernilevsky 18:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Eurocopter 130 flying low over the sea. —Airwolf 12:01, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline QI requires excellent photographic quality, not a particularly rare / valuable subject, and the quality is just average (noise, light etc.). But I think it has good chances to successfully run for Valued Image. Please add geolocation. -- H005 06:11, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A male Orthetrum brunneum (Brown Skimmer) -- Alvesgaspar 22:54, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good, QI - sure Richard Bartz 16:39, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fountain in the Nordpark of Düsseldorf, Germany --H005 19:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion witzige Idee, aber prüf mal, ob's nicht ganz leicht aus der Horizontalen geht. --Mbdortmund 00:16, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
     Comment Done, the fountain frame is absolutely horizontal, that's the best you can have, isn't it? -- H005 17:07, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
    OK --Mbdortmund 20:51, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Iodine bolete (Boletus impolitus) --George Chernilevsky 11:15, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good photographic quality -- H005 21:11, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Salt evaporation ponds in Sečovlje Salina, Slovenia. --Yerpo 08:24, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination A couple of Orthetrum brunneum (Brown Skimmer) preparing to mate -- Alvesgaspar 22:54, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Excellent shot! --George Chernilevsky 05:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pulpit of Saint-Pierre cathedral, Geneva. Yann 19:17, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Question Are those rays around the lights from the original image? -- H005 19:27, 14 July 2009 (UTC) Yes, I only corrected the perspective. Yann 19:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
    good details, lights IMO OK for about 1 second exposure --Mbdortmund 00:14, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Forde Abbey, Somerset. Maedin 06:36, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good result --George Chernilevsky 05:23, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Bay of Kissamos and the Rodopou peninsula (Crete, Greece) -- MJJR 20:54, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. Maedin 06:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
     Comment Aaah, although it's been almost 10 years since I was there, I immediately knew where it is w/o looking at the description. Cool! 8-) -- H005 18:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC) -- It's my pleasure! MJJR 18:47, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gaillardia x grandiflora --Captain-tucker 10:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok. Maedin 12:25, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Water Avens (Geum rivale). --kallerna 17:37, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion DOF is quite shallow, but enough details are visible, IMO. --Yerpo 20:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Semi Citroën 2CV. --High Contrast 07:14, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Tilted background, overblown wall on the left. Main subject is well captured (and interesting), tho. --Yerpo 20:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A couple of Oxes at the traditional Sorochyns'ky fair, Ukraine by user Turzh --George Chernilevsky 05:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Unsharp, don't like the composition. --Yerpo 19:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cantharidae, Bastavales, Brión, Galicia.--Lmbuga 19:50, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Too low DOF unfortunately, but light and composition are excellent. -- H005 18:46, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common walnut Juglans regia --George Chernilevsky 10:53, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice --Mbdortmund 11:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trevi Fountain, by User:Diliff. Maedin 06:36, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion shure QI --Mbdortmund 09:08, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A greylag goose --H005 01:12, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good composition and colours --Mbdortmund 02:32, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Herford (Germany): minster -- MJJR 20:54, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support -- H005 21:27, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The coast near Phalasarna, northwest Crete (Greece) -- MJJR 20:54, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. Maedin 06:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Faschina-Fontanella --Böhringer 20:38, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support -- H005 21:25, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination European honey bee on Swamp Cinquefoil. --kallerna 17:52, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. Is this a Sigma 105 mm Macro lens you used? Lycaon 17:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
     Comment Yes it is. It's superb lens IMO. --kallerna 18:05, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chrysomya albiceps on Swamp Cinquefoil. --kallerna 17:42, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI for sure. Lycaon 17:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Richard Karp, Turing Prize 1985 -- Rama 15:36, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Too much noise IMHo and some parts of the face not sharp enough. All those Richard Karp portraits you shot today suffer from too low DOF in one way or the other. That surprises me for a Canon 5D in standard program! -- H005 17:10, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
    Because the lens was essentially wide open because there was almost no light, perhaps? Rama 18:33, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
    Well, enough light apparently for 1/200 sec @ ISO 640. Anyway, don't get me wrong, these pictures are of great value for Wikipedia and overall good shots, just slightly miss the QI reqs IMHO, sorry for that. -- H005 19:32, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Richard Karp, Turing Prize 1985 -- Rama 13:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Chroma noise, vignetting, and unfortunate purple hue from the lighting. Maedin 16:47, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The wasp spider Argiope bruennichi --George Chernilevsky 10:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good, fine details --Mbdortmund 02:19, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Warstein-Sichtigvor by Stefan Didam --Mbdortmund 01:24, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Noise and compression artefacts. Lack of detail. --Afrank99 19:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The St Jodocus church at Wewelsburg (Germany) -- MJJR 20:50, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. Please add geocode. --Smial 09:40, 13 July 2009 (UTC) --  Done: Geocode added. -- MJJR 18:51, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Organ of the Maccabees Chapel, St-Pierre cathedral, Geneva, Switzerland. Yann 23:18, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment Beautiful instrument but barrel distortion ought to be corrected. --Iotatau 06:34, 12 July 2009 (UTC)  Question What is "barrel distortion"? Yann 23:22, 12 July 2009 (UTC) --  Comment En français, barrel distortion se dit "distortion en barillet"; c'est une distortion optique qui fait que le sujet semble légèrement bombé. -- MJJR 08:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
    D#accord, also it would better be cropped symmetrically. I think both flaws can easily be fixed, then it'll have my support. -- H005 19:49, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
     Comment Distortion reduced, tried symmetrical cropping, but looks in my opinion not good, so uploaded version without crop. Please reload&review. -- Smial 21:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
    looks OK --Mbdortmund 02:21, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Centaurea macrocephala. Maedin 22:30, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI. --kallerna 16:52, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Echinops bannaticus. Maedin 22:13, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI. --kallerna 16:52, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Syrphidae sp. in a flower. --ComputerHotline 09:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Not identified. Lycaon 06:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old windmills on Crete (Greece) -- MJJR 19:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good for me --George Chernilevsky 11:17, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yoho National Park, Canada --Tupungato 21:31, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good -- H005 19:51, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ascent of Helvellyn, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 18:50, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support-- H005 19:52, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Remains or armored vehicles in Sha'ar hagai, Israel. --Adiel lo 05:55, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Unfortunate drastic loss of sharpness in the background, but lighting and the educational value let me forgive this. -- H005 19:55, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pavo cristatus (male) in San Francisco Zoo--Mbz1 03:11, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline composition not so good, details and lighting could be better --Mbdortmund 22:52, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
    Thank you for the review. Please decline then. I have no problems with that. :)--Mbz1 16:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
    Done, as I agree with Mbdortmund -- H005 17:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blackberries in a range of ripeness. --George Chernilevsky 19:19, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Unforunate lighting, DOF too shallow --Afrank99 12:44, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Elks in Yellowstone NP --Mbz1 18:06, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline underexposed, head not in focus, unfortunate crop. --Afrank99 12:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination French marigold Tagetes patula, possibly a hybrid cultivar. Ukraine. --George Chernilevsky 13:10, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Afrank99 12:43, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alexander Spring Creek --Ianare 03:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Sky is overexposed, and overall strange lighting. --Afrank99 12:43, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Herrstein, Timber-frame Building. --Berthold Werner 08:37, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Neutral or even weak oppose. Nice house, sharp and exposure are good, but the composition is very weak IMHO. -- H005 22:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
    ok. --Afrank99 12:39, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Military complex at the Salbert hill between 1953 to 1972. --ComputerHotline 16:23, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Please provide references --Ianare 05:08, 6 July 2009 (UTC) ----- Personals topography. --ComputerHotline 09:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
     Oppose Small text objects need to be fixed. --Afrank99 12:38, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A new version of Anshunlang bridge --Charlie fong 04:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient resolution, please add geocode -- H005 08:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Speichersee and Canal Richard Bartz 22:09, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion -- H005 09:03, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Seascape with garbage bins at Kissamos, Crete, Greece -- MJJR 20:50, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Interesting contrast -- H005 09:01, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Image of an XBox 360 wired controller. --Asim18 18:50, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. -- H005 22:16, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cliffs Grain de sable near Bonifacio (France) BartekPtaszyński 14:51, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. -- H005 22:17, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Universal Temple at Ramakrishna Mission, Chennai --Bgag 14:34, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Good view, good light, but some CA and loss of detail, probably due to strong noise supression. -- Smial 16:31, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Street in Beilstein at the river Mosel --Berthold Werner 10:10, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice view, but unfortunately chromatic aberration and insufficient sharpness on the house in the rear, also most of the picture is rather dark. -- H005 09:09, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Anshunlang bridge and Ji river in Chengdu,Sichuan province,China. --Charlie fong 08:42, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Attractive view but too small. Do you have a bigger version? --Iotatau 08:50, 12 July 2009 (UTC)  Comment --It's a great pity,I lost the bigger one in a netcafe,something wrong with this mechine. --Charlie fong 09:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
    In spite of its insufficient size I promote this image due to exceptional documentary value. Please post more and try to preserve original size in future. --Iotatau 10:23, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
     OpposeSorry, but beside size is much too small, imho it's too dark and whitebalance is bad and the main object is nearly in the background. --Berthold Werner 12:43, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
    This can not be promoted. Unlike FP, QI has not mitigation for size. Perceived exceptionally valuable images should be nominated withe an appropriate scope to VI. Lycaon 06:01, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stations of the Cross in Warstein-Sichtigvor, Germany --Mbdortmund 04:15, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Atmospheric view, the important parts are sharp, good composition. Missing geo coordinates. -- Smial 19:49, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Westfälisches Freilichtmuseum in Detmold (Germany) -- MJJR 20:12, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good shot, description should have more detail. --Smial 22:55, 11 July 2009 (UTC) --  Done Description completed -- MJJR 08:03, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castello di Miramare. --Adiel lo 08:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks a bit tilted and geolocation ist helpful at photographs of buildings. --Berthold Werner 13:35, 9 July 2009
     Comment Hmm.. The horizon looks straight to me. I added a geocode. Adiel lo 18:39, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
    The walls on the left side are tilted cw, needs perspective correction, otherwise good --Mbdortmund 00:56, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
    Perspective corrected. Would someone now promote? --Berthold Werner 15:25, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
    Looks good now. --Iotatau 17:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Macroglossum stellatarum --ComputerHotline 19:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Too small but too good for me for declining. --Iotatau 20:07, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
    Below size requirements, sadly. --Afrank99 18:41, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Deutschordensschloss in Mülheim/Möhne --Mbdortmund 04:22, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --George Chernilevsky 10:13, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Deutschordensschloss in Mülheim/Möhne by User:Gnu1742 --Mbdortmund 23:42, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Attractive building, good sky. --Iotatau 06:31, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Backlit Meconopsis 'Lingholm'. Maedin 20:18, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion fine structures, nice Bukeh --Mbdortmund 00:16, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Westfälisches Freilichtmuseum in Detmold (Germany) -- MJJR 20:12, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice composition. --High Contrast 22:22, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landscape in Crete (Greece) -- MJJR 20:12, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 09:26, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Laufwasserkraftwerk Finsing, Germany Richard Bartz 16:59, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice, not technical problems, good shadows. #!George Shuklin 20:41, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Laufwasserkraftwerk Finsing, Germany Richard Bartz 16:59, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 23:44, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lightnings. --ComputerHotline 07:18, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good Abigor 20:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 15th Century Pieta in Senlis cathedrale -- Rama 13:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Main object too dark -- H005 12:26, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination dangerous Bromine very good sealed chemical element sample --Alchemist-hp 21:40, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Mediocre sharpness and CA, but good lighting and composition.  Request Once you remove the slight left-tilt, it's certainly QI. --Afrank99 08:25, 11 July 2009 (UTC) Done --Alchemist-hp 10:55, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Argynnis aglaja --Böhringer 21:21, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Superb. --Iotatau 21:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bonifacio (Corsica,France) --Bartek Ptaszyński 22:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Too dark -- H005 10:23, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rudna Droga (Mogielnica, Polska) --Bartek Ptaszyński 22:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Noise, underexposed, lack of fine details. --Afrank99 08:27, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Agia Galini (Crete, Greece) -- MJJR 19:35, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline technically ok, but boring subject and composition. --H005 10:28, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The entrance of Jinhuaguan, Chunxi street, Chengdu.--Charlie fong 15:33, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Well done, just that ad to the left is a pity. -- H005 16:48, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hand holding a bar -- Rama 13:08, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good idea and good quality -- H005 13:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lightnings. --ComputerHotline 07:18, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Well done, albeit the overly long exposure. -- H005 16:48, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Snail (please, help me to recognise specie). #!George Shuklin 19:14, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline I like the neutral white backgroud with the waterdrops, but unfortunately way too shallow DOF -- H005 10:32, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Confluence of Nemunas River and Merkys River, Lithuania. --Hugo.arg 16:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Sorry, the photo is definitely tilted Tupungato 18:32, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
    Excellent view, but unfortunately tilted, blurry and full of chromatic aberration. I'd love to see the same view in high quality. -- H005 10:46, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Beilstein at the river Mosel, Altes Zollhaus --Berthold Werner 13:05, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok. Maedin 22:34, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A hot heron --Ianare 03:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion It looks kind of dark on a thumbnail, but is good, when one zooms it. Very nice.--Tupungato 17:23, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Elvis Presley's grave in Graceland. --Dschwen 23:23, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination View of Kokkini Hani, near Herakleion (Crete, Greece) -- MJJR 20:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline technical quality is ok, albeit not superb, but unclear composition, subject not overly exciting, telegraph lines. -- H005 10:52, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: University of Cologne, pano of the Main Building --S^[1] 16:56, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Tor Corona observed near Saltholm, Øresund --Slaunger 23:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment A more experienced reviewer ought to judge whether the blurring out of the water surface left and right of the ship reflections is within the allowed postprocessing limits. Otherwise good. --Iotatau 17:07, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
    for me the border between reflections and water is not OK --Mbdortmund 09:19, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
    I do not understand why the left and right side were simply filled with blue color. Looks distracting and irrtating IMHO. -- H005 13:51, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zeiss planetarium, Berlin. --Iotatau 10:13, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Tupungato 11:26, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Araneus diadematus. --ComputerHotline 07:18, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice --Mbdortmund 11:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hans Meyer Memorial --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 21:14, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI. Location would be useful. --Iotatau 09:28, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landscape of Crete (Greece) -- MJJR 19:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good composition, attractive foreground. --Iotatau 09:30, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parco di Miramare. --Adiel lo 08:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline crop + distortion --Mbdortmund 01:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chiemsee, Krautinsel --Aconcagua 20:26, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline nice composition, but foreground too dark --H005 21:57, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Young student, India --Bgag 23:06, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Bad light (shadows on eyes) #!George Shuklin 20:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mute Swans, Lake Tegel, Berlin --Aconcagua 19:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Unbalanced Light, distracting grass in front -- H005 22:04, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A591 road, Lake District, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 12:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment I am not a fan of "HDR-ish look", maybe others are :) --Iotatau 13:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
    Ok, fair enough, :-) Just for the record though, I investigated and was informed that this is not HDR or exposure blended. Diliff only brightened the shadows a little. Maedin 18:18, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
    I stand corrected, thanks. --Iotatau 18:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
    HDR or not, it looks very artificial, like a 1960s postcard, just sharper -- H005 22:17, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grampians, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 19:19, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Overexposed IMHO, but nonetheless a great panorama. -- H005 22:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The beach at Kokkini Hani (Crete, Greece) -- MJJR 21:23, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Lucanus cervus male. Ukraine --George Chernilevsky 13:37, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Lucanus cervus male. Ukraine --George Chernilevsky 13:37, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Raymond H. "Hap" Spuhler Baseball Field at George Mason University Fairfax Virginia--Jarekt 03:48, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment tilt, correct, please --George Chernilevsky 06:21, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
    I stared at it and stared a little more and I still can not figure out which way is it tilted. --Jarekt 14:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
     Comment I think George refers to converging verticals/keystoning. --Iotatau 19:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
    Thanks, I see it not. I uploaded a new version. --Jarekt 12:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
    Good enough for me now. Next time put up a tripod and use f/8, border sharpness of the kit lenses fully open is only so-so. --Iotatau 12:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panoramic view of Lake Lucerne from Axenstrasse --Simisa 17:02, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Not only because I love Lake Lucerne, one of the most beautiful places on earth. Sigh! -- H005 22:31, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old water tower with illumination --George Chernilevsky 19:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Technically not perfect (noise, sharpness just ok, overexposed clock), but nonetheless I like it very much. Please add geolocation! -- H005 22:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View on Washington DC from Arlington, Va --Jarekt 18:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment I like the scene but the image has a greenish tint. Did you take it through the glass of a tower? --Iotatau 16:03, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
    I did. I uploded a new version (hopefully) correcting the tint and a tilt I noticed. --Jarekt 03:21, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cistus salviifolius. Lycaon 06:34, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment If it's a RAW image I'd try again with about -0.7 EV. --Iotatau 19:36, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
    Nope, sorry, that one was from before my raw time. Lycaon 05:31, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
    Reworked slightly from original (not RAW). Lycaon 16:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
    Sorry, Lycaon, this is still just too bright. Maedin 17:39, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Potato field in Nakkila. --kallerna 20:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Perfect, nice --George Chernilevsky 20:50, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Head of Pharaoh Hound. --kallerna 20:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Iotatau 20:47, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chiemsee, pier at the southern tip of the Fraueninsel --Aconcagua 20:26, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice composition like the other one which is only a bit dark in the foreground --Mbdortmund 22:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Macroglossum stellatarum --ComputerHotline 19:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Slightly soft but great subject, good composition and colors. --Iotatau 20:04, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Macroglossum stellatarum --ComputerHotline 19:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice but way below 2 MP minimum size. I just promoted the bigger one. --Iotatau 20:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aster amellus (created by Aka) --D-Kuru 19:26, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Not identified. Lycaon 07:29, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Echinocereus conglomeratus (created by Aka) --D-Kuru 19:26, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Iotatau 20:02, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Kunstturm" (art tower) in Altenburg, Thuringia, Germany (created by Aka) --D-Kuru 19:26, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Tupungato 20:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Casa Milà, Barcelona, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 18:52, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good blue hour shot. --Iotatau 19:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A male Checkered White --Meganmccarty 18:17, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion DOF is tight but otherwise beautiful. --Iotatau 18:31, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hospital "Prenzlauer Berg", Berlin. --Iotatau 13:38, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good view, perfect DOF --George Chernilevsky 13:43, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Orthodox church in Vinnytsia, Ukraine. The Southern Bug river bank. --George Chernilevsky 13:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice composition, good exposure (clouds). Image date is in future :) --Iotatau 13:47, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 2009/Decline
• 
  • Nomination Fagus sylvatica on the shore of Lake Bohinj, Slovenia. --Adiel lo 05:41, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Dull colors and tree is cropped. --Afrank99 16:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Small waterfall in Paulo de Frontin, Rio de Janeiro. 1 second exposure. --Vittau 22:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Excellent -- H005 16:37, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dried fish, Chennai, India --Bgag 23:09, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Interesting --H005 16:43, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shore Temple, Mahabalipuram, India --Bgag 22:26, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice colours, good quality, appropriate lighting Tupungato 18:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pancha Rathas, India --Bgag 19:29, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice colours, good quality, appropriate lighting Tupungato 18:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Germany, Herrstein, Fountain and Timber-frame Buildings --Berthold Werner 08:18, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The young grass snake (Natrix natrix). --George Chernilevsky 18:16, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Mont-Blanc from Vétraz-Montoux, Haute-Savoie (60 km). --Yann 11:03, 1 July 2009
  • Decline  Comment With permission of Yann I uploaded a new version. --Iotatau 22:48, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
    *  Oppose The main subject is neither clear nor large enough, instead small and foggy -- H005 22:37, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination From the old town i Aarhus, Denmark --Villy Fink Isaksen 09:24, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Nice houses but the bottom left is distracting. --Iotatau 22:20, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
     Oppose Nice view, but tilt and white blurred. sorry --George Chernilevsky 13:55, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sarcophaga sp. Richard Bartz 23:49, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Brilliant. --Iotatau 23:58, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flowers of Aloe sp.. Porto Covo, west coast of Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 23:11, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice colours and composition --Mbdortmund 23:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Polish Yak-18 in flight. --Airwolf 21:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good --George Chernilevsky 08:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Centaurea dealbata. Maedin 20:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good, QI --George Chernilevsky 20:51, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blackberries in a range of ripeness. --George Chernilevsky 19:19, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice --Mbdortmund 23:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mute Swan, Cygnet, Lake Tegel, Berlin --Aconcagua 19:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Excellent shot --George Chernilevsky 19:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brown Bears, National Park Bavarian Forest --Aconcagua 19:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion I do not think there are brown bears in the wild in Germany. I assume the image was taken in a so called unique ZOO located National Park Bavarian Forest.If so, I believe that info should be added to the image description. Thank you.--Mbz1 19:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
    You're right, it's an open-air enclosure. Description is added. --Aconcagua 20:04, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
    Good enough for an action shot.--Mbz1 22:21, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination European Wildcat, National Park Bavarian Forest --Aconcagua 19:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion I assume the image was taken in a so called unique ZOO located National Park Bavarian Forest.I believe that info should be added to the image description. Thank you.--Mbz1 19:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
    You're right, it's an open-air enclosure. Description is added. --Aconcagua 20:04, 7 July 2009 (UTC)Good.--Mbz1 22:21, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nominated before, but now perspective is corrected (even though I'm not that good at doing this). --Vittau 03:39, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion The crop might be too tight, otherwise good.--Mbz1 12:54, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Decomposing Virginia Opossum (Didelphis virginiana) TimVickers 21:48, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good and biologically useful information. As you have suffered a smell? --George Chernilevsky 08:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The grass snake (Natrix natrix) moves through a bog. It is other snake, not the same, but too Natrix natrix --George Chernilevsky 13:49, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good (considering camera) --Ianare 16:03, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Trail blazing on Králický Sněžník/Śnieżnik mountain --Pudelek 16:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Leucanthemum x superbum --Captain-tucker 23:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good work --George Chernilevsky 08:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination new experiment with different lighting --Böhringer 19:20, 6 July 2009 (UTC))
  • Promotion Very, very nice.--Mbz1 22:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coprinus comatus - Adelaide Zoo, South Australia- Peripitus 07:45, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline White balance is off. Shaggy Ink Caps are white, not bluish. Lycaon 21:21, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A hot and wet heron --Ianare 03:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Nice composition!--Mbz1 18:06, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion
• 
  • Nomination New World Dutch barn in upstate NY --Daniel Case 02:26, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment too big compression in Photoshop. Upload, please new version, 2Mb or more, not 600 Kb (Image options -> Quality 11 approximate). Recreate it from a camera's source file --George Chernilevsky 06:41, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
    now quality sufficient, good composition --George Chernilevsky 18:49, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The head of the Soviet missile Kh-25ML (AS-10 "Kerry") with semi-active laser guidance --George Chernilevsky 20:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Germany, Herrstein, Clock tower --Berthold Werner 17:12, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination French marigold Tagetes patula, possibly a hybrid cultivar. Ukraine. --George Chernilevsky 13:10, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Iotatau 14:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alauda arvensis, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 08:42, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good shot! --George Chernilevsky 09:08, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red-browed Finch (Neochmia temporalis) - Peripitus 07:45, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good --George Chernilevsky 09:08, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Peace (Potsdam-Sanssouci). --Iotatau 06:57, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good QI --George Chernilevsky 10:01, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grus canadensis pratensis in Ocala Natl Forest--Ianare 03:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion I like this one. --Estrilda 05:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Toxotes jaculatrix --Chrumps 00:51, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline nice fish, but unsharp, not QI --George Chernilevsky 05:10, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lilium martagon --Böhringer 21:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 00:09, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Leucorrhinia dubia on Eriophorum vaginatum --Böhringer 20:33, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Iotatau 21:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Episyrphus balteatus Richard Bartz 20:25, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Excellent. --Iotatau 20:54, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cycle rickshaws, Chennai, India --Bgag 19:28, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Colorful. --Iotatau 19:38, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Derwent Water, Lake District, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 19:19, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Iotatau 21:51, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kleivafossen waterfall --Aqwis 14:08, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Remove some sensor dust spots and you'll get a promotion :) --Iotatau 14:35, 5 July 2009 (UTC)  Done --Aqwis 15:03, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
    QI for me now. --Iotatau 15:55, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination USS George Washington Gnangarra 13:35, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
• 
  • Nomination USS George Washington Gnangarra 13:35, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn 1/20 s at 300 mm doesn't work, unfortunately. Might be worth a try as a "Valued Picture". --Iotatau 16:05, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
    why doesnt 1/20 at 300m work 300mm is focal distance and 1/20s is the time the shutter is open what wrong with this? Gnangarra 01:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC),  Oppose at large focal lengths the camera shake gets amplified too. This can be avoided with shorter exposure times. This picture is not only shaky, its also blurry. Sorry. --Dschwen 02:36, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination German Ministry of the Interior (double towers) at Spree river, Berlin. --Iotatau 12:42, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good documentation, could be a little sharper in full solution. --Mbdortmund 13:20, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gonepteryx rhamni on Cirsium sp. flower --ComputerHotline 09:04, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Wing is not sharp enough (f3,8, position) -- Pro2 11:05, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 360° panorama in Karwendel (Alps). --92.229.80.6 09:27, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Beautiful landscape but the sky is not stitched well. --Iotatau 09:38, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jackson Square, New Orleans. --Dschwen 22:28, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 23:16, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The palace of Knossos (Crete, Greece) -- MJJR 20:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. You were lucky with the weather, it was overcast when I took a similar picture some years ago. Lycaon 22:21, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Agave americana -- MJJR 20:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion very good --George Chernilevsky 21:14, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) --Calibas 14:16, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good shot! QI --George Chernilevsky 15:15, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Dutch Fire Truck in Action - Abigor 10:26, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Bad Sharpness. Try f=1/8 and lower ISO next time. You will get a much better picture. HBR 16:11, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Green turtles in tide pools--Mbz1 02:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good DOF, sharp --Ianare 04:25, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Golden Retriever relaxing --MichaelMcPhee 23:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Excellent sharpness on face and nose. -- HBR 16:02, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lepidochelys olivacea (Olive Ridley turtle), India --Bgag 23:09, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Iotatau 23:15, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Young woman of Tamil Nadu, India --Bgag 22:45, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Iotatau 21:56, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination animated function of a zoom Smial --Mbdortmund 20:36, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good work -- HBR 16:02, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination typewriter by Smial --Mbdortmund 20:36, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline If this is a studio photograph QI expects near perfection as lighting etc can be controlled. Here we have a couple of bad reflections from the flash, eg the key "Z". If it is taken under adverse conditions (eg a museum display then I would promote) --Tony Wills 11:26, 4 July 2009 (UTC) Comment Sorry, missed the nomination. No studio shot, made at the collector's home with flash on camera, sheet of grey wrapping paper as background, and a little help from a white wall. The "Z" and some other keys lost the colour, the machine is more than 80 Years old :-) -- smial 09:25, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination special sample: Continuous casting copper disc (99,95% pure), macro etched, ∅ ≈83 mm. --Alchemist-hp 16:58, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. --Iotatau 17:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Drink-Up --Rastaman3000 17:53, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Low quality: colour balance, CA, too dark. --George Chernilevsky 18:25, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Western Crowned Pigeon (Goura cristata.png) --Rastaman3000 17:16, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Poor light, noisy and below size limit. Lycaon 16:21, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Great Mosque of Sousse, Tunisia --Bgag 15:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Iotatau 15:55, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lucanus cervus male. Ukraine --George Chernilevsky 13:37, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. One of the advantages of compact cameras is the huge DOF compared to SLR. --Iotatau 15:56, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mugilogobius abei --Seotaro 13:03, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Perfect --George Chernilevsky 13:11, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A five year old hanging around bouldering wall in Sportrock climbing gym in Alexandria, Virginia, USA.--Jarekt 03:48, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Noisy, blotchy, unfortunate lighting. --Afrank99 11:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Western Scrub Jay (Aphelocoma californica) Joshua Tree National Park near Hidden Valley Campground--Jarekt 03:48, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Noisy and underexposed. --Afrank99 11:45, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mendenhall Glacier print-resolution Notyourbroom 03:00, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline un bel effort unfortunate lighting, too dark --Ianare 04:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mendenhall Glacier web-resolution Notyourbroom 03:00, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Question What's the point in uploading a second file in lower resolution? We usually don't do that. --Afrank99 11:48, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
    A scaled down version can't be QI if a larger version exists. Lycaon 06:54, 4 July 2009 (UTC) My reason for nominating both was that, due to its extremely high resolution, small flaws and noise are more easily visible in the full version. This debate comes up from time to time, whether it is fair for lower-resolution images to be approved for QI or FP when a higher-resolution version might be rejected, despite being of greater worth. Notyourbroom 03:21, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panorama of Bayer AG in Leverkusen, re-stitched version --S^[1] 22:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Major improvement compared to previous nomination. For me it's a QI now. --Iotatau 23:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Big Tipi from the Expo 2000, now Dortmund --Mbdortmund 19:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good, QI --George Chernilevsky 06:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Big Tipi from the Expo 2000, now Dortmund --Mbdortmund 19:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion bit simple, but technically QI ----George Chernilevsky 06:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination My first attempt at QI, a garden spider.--Camaron 18:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Technilcally not QI, sorry, unsharp. Try more. All wait better photos from You, Camaron. Regards, ----George Chernilevsky 06:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
    Okay, thank you for your feedback George. Camaron 07:55, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The young grass snake (Natrix natrix). --George Chernilevsky 18:16, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Body is blurry, bit overexposed. The other one is better --Ianare 04:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The young grass snake (Natrix natrix). --George Chernilevsky 18:16, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good portrait, useful --Mbdortmund 19:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Niwaella delicata --Seotaro 14:10, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion "delicata" sounds good... --Mbdortmund 19:25, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lefua echigonia --Seotaro 14:10, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good shot --George Chernilevsky 06:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Derwent Water, Keswick, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 12:25, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good work --Mbdortmund 19:27, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Nikolaus, Bergisch Gladbach. --Iotatau 10:14, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, nice composition --George Chernilevsky 10:45, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz 220 S Cabriolet (W180 II). --Iotatau 09:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good composition, very good lighting, subject really stands out. --Maurilbert 13:07, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Naked woman, Ivory, New Empire -- Rama 22:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion A bit of sharpening grain in background but otherwise good. Reduction to about 50% has helped sharpness :) --Iotatau 16:13, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clapham Common, London, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 20:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Ianare 05:11, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Herrstein, Bell tower --Berthold Werner 14:03, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good focus, lighting, exposure, colors, perspective correction. Composition challenging due to several nearby objects but handled well. --Iotatau 17:14, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination French Navy officer sabre, 19th Century -- Rama 13:48, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Good object, but i decline. Unsharp, sensor dust and colour balance (steel blade is pink on this photo). --George Chernilevsky 13:59, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Melanargia galathea --Leviathan1983 08:18, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 08:56, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Semipalmated Sandpiper by Mdf --Mbdortmund 00:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline nice quality, but too small: 1,5 Megapixels only :-( --George Chernilevsky 16:10, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of the old fort Koules at Herakleion, Greece. -- MJJR 21:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good work, QI --George Chernilevsky 17:12, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
     Question What is tiny red spot at bottom center, like laser pointer? --George Chernilevsky 17:12, 5 July 2009 (UTC) -- Thank you for your remark. I have no explanation for the presence of that strange red spot. I removed it. -- MJJR 20:30, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Art Nouveau building in Gliwice (Gleiwitz), Upper Silesia --Pudelek 16:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Could benefit from a brightening. --Iotatau 22:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
    Now I like it. --Iotatau 10:37, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture in Góra Świętej Anny (St. Annaberg, Anaberg), Upper Silesia --Pudelek 16:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline feet cut off --Ianare 05:09, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panorama at Rhone Glacier --Simisa 16:03, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. Maedin 09:21, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coreopsis Bud --Twdragon 09:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Too-tight crop, unnatural black background and blurry in part. --Daniel Case 01:51, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sea turtle sign --Ianare 08:06, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Mendel's independent Assortment and segregation -LadyofHats 08:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment changes requested done-LadyofHats 08:19, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
    Essential illustration for any biology course, well executed. --Iotatau 08:22, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Herakleion (Greece): the Agios Titos basilica. -- MJJR 21:27, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Tunnel boring machine KTF 280 in the German Mining Museum, Bochum. --Iotatau 09:22, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good. --Afrank99 18:30, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Speicherstadt Hamburg --Mbdortmund 21:45, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very minor perspective problem. Good DOF and sharp --Ianare 05:04, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Port of Hamburg, Musical König der Löwen --Mbdortmund 14:48, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Nice foreground but subject a bit small? --Iotatau 20:10, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
     Comment Der (regional auch das) Bugspriet
    The bowsprit is main object in this photo. With this description I  Support this photo. Quality is good --George Chernilevsky 08:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inside the fort at the Salbert hill (HDR). --ComputerHotline 09:33, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK --Ianare 05:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Simmental in Switzerland. (by User:Simisa) --High Contrast 19:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Nice landscape but challenging lighting. --Iotatau 19:53, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Savior in Bydgoszcz -- Albertus teolog 14:01, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Unfortunately clipped at bottom and bit tilted. I like this view, but by technically it is not Ok, sorry --George Chernilevsky 08:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Great Zimbabwe Donjon - Close to Masvingo, Zimbabwe. Lycaon 21:04, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Document linked. Lycaon 16:16, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
    Nice image but the lighting does not work with the angle, subject and trees. - Peripitus 07:56, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old water tower with illumination --George Chernilevsky 19:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very attractive night image in good quality. Blue and yellow throughout the picture... --Iotatau 19:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cactus Wren (Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus) in Joshua Tree National Park --Jarekt 18:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Oh-h-h... Very nice view, regards to Author. But technically low quality, sorry. I really like this photo --George Chernilevsky 19:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Trapps cliff of Shawangunk Ridge located at Mohonk Preserve near New Paltz, New York.--Jarekt 18:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice composition, but too blurry + lots of CA. --kallerna 19:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Laby bird (Coccinella septempunctata) on a bean leaf. Yann 14:22, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline The beetle is really too small and also OOF. Lycaon 17:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Misumena vatia on Scabiosa columbaria --Böhringer 10:55, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Interesting combination of spider and flower. --Iotatau 16:46, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dionaea muscipula (Venus Flytrap) flower - 20mm in diameter by Calyponte --Calyponte 07:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Well-managed exposure. --Iotatau 16:49, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canadian Tiger Swallowtail by Mdf --Mbdortmund 00:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice. --kallerna 19:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Helophilus pendulus by Mdf --Mbdortmund 00:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline I wish you had waited until the outcome of the id issues. Please renominate afterwards as technically it is a certain QI. Lycaon 05:44, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fryderyk Chopin (sailboat) observed in the Baltic Sea --Slaunger 23:20, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion i think it is ok for QI even if there are some color aberations on the sky-LadyofHats 08:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schlosskirche Buch. --Iotatau 21:30, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good, QI --George Chernilevsky 09:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Opole (Oppeln), Upper Silesia. Old City - St. Adalbert street and market place --Pudelek 16:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice city detail. Here the exposure is very good. --Iotatau 22:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Colosseum, Rome, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 12:37, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion YAD, Yet Another Diliff. --Iotatau 22:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
    yes, yes, yes! (is not FP?) --Pudelek 21:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Green Lizard on dead leaves --Moise Nicu 12:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great! Lycaon 21:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lake Ohrid, Macedonia --MRB 09:20, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion very good
     Support --George Chernilevsky 13:48, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Panteleimon monastery, Ohrid (Macedonia) --MRB 09:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Surroundings a bit distracting but probably unavoidable. Otherwise QI. --Iotatau 22:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nycticorax violaceus at beach --Ianare 06:35, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice. Maedin 12:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nycticorax violaceus at beach walking --Ianare 06:35, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality it is enough in my opinion. The movement is well shown --George Chernilevsky 13:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination MV Grand Voyager observed in the Baltic Sea--Slaunger 23:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Iotatau 22:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beach in Colington Harbour on Colington Island, North Carolina. --Jarekt 03:26, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok. --Iotatau 22:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Western Scrub Jay (Aphelocoma californica) Joshua Tree National Park near Real Hidden Valley parking lot. --Jarekt 03:26, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Subject too small (if cropped would not meet size requirements) --Ianare 08:19, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
    That is already a crop. I really wished for better lens for this shot. --Jarekt 21:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Speicherstadt Hamburg --Mbdortmund 16:53, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Unfortunate framing: bottom of building seems to be cut-off --Maurilbert 03:02, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Speicherstadt Hamburg --Mbdortmund 16:53, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good sharpness, balanced composition --Maurilbert 03:02, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Speicherstadt Hamburg --Mbdortmund 16:53, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline definitely blurry in the upper left corner (insufficient DOF ?) --Maurilbert 03:02, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Speicherstadt Hamburg --Mbdortmund 16:53, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline unsharp, overprocessed w/sharpen tool? Intrusive bridge arches, tight crop on the left hand side --Maurilbert 03:02, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Double density 5.25" floppy disk #!George Shuklin 17:30, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Noise, chromatic aberration, not too sharp --Ianare 08:22, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
    I'm sorry, this is not a noise (100iso!). Look to the film - there is no noise, this is a texture of cover #!George Shuklin 04:48, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Port of Hamburg, church --Mbdortmund 14:48, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Most of the church is not in shot. TimVickers 21:31, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Viborg Kraftvarmeværk. Renomination. In the previous nomination it was declined due to distortion at the chimney. I have now done a perspective correction, whereby I think it should be fixed. --Slaunger 16:18, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Another rework available -- Smial 11:36, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
    Magst Du Deine Version vorschlagen, am besten neben diesem Bild --Mbdortmund 13:17, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
     The other edit by smial is better and has been promoted to QI already. --Slaunger 22:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Joshua Tree National Park: The Blob Formation at Hidden Valley Campground. --Jarekt 13:23, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Shadow a little distracting, but nice colours and sharp --Ianare 00:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Climber on Stem Gem a classic V4 boulder problem in Joshua Tree National Park in Hidden Valley Campground. --Jarekt 13:23, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Don't like cut-off feet. --Iotatau 19:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
    I see it and agree, I should have paid more attention to those other guys. --Jarekt 21:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Podarcis muralis. Lycaon 19:52, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Nectarinia mariquensis. Lycaon 19:52, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion very good (any chance of ID'ing the plant ?) --Ianare 08:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
    Plant is an Aloe sp., I may do better, but not as yet. Lycaon 21:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sculpture "Żyrafa" in Silesian Central Park. --Lestath 07:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination The trailing suction hopper dredger Pallieter, while dredging at Zeebrugge port, Belgium.. Lycaon 06:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Would get my promotion with a crop like Ter Streep. --Iotatau 20:02, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
    Was not cropped because of port surroundings. The other one was taken at open sea. Lycaon 05:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
    Port surroundings good. I mean the top and bottom 1/5 strip (plain sky and waves) which don't contribute to ship. --Iotatau 09:31, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
    Cropped. Lycaon 19:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
    I like this "work horse" and see no significant flaws. --Iotatau 19:58, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Scooter parked at a college campus --Specious 20:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Review crop a bit tight --Mbdortmund 21:04, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Herakleion (Greece): the harbour. -- MJJR 21:27, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline tilted --Ianare 08:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Herakleion (Greece): the harbour and the fort Koules. -- MJJR 21:27, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --Ianare 08:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Seine at Samois-sur-Seine (Seine-et-Marne, France) --Myrabella 16:18, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good focus, exposure, lighting, composition, with location. --Iotatau 16:58, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The town of Keswick, Cumbria, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 16:02, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion excellent --George Chernilevsky 16:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scene of the Gay Pride of 27 June 2009 at the Place de la Bastille in Paris. --Rama 11:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline lots of chromatic aberration, unsharp --George Chernilevsky 13:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scene of the Gay Pride of 27 June 2009 at the Place de la Bastille in Paris. --Rama 11:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment "Adding more than a couple of images at once can be considered flooding, which is frowned upon." COM:QIC --Iotatau 11:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
     Oppose low quality, chromatic aberration --George Chernilevsky 13:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture "Sleeping lion" in Bytom. Yarl 15:07, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --George Chernilevsky 14:16, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ophrys insectifera. Lycaon 12:06, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Overexposed, shallow DOF --Ianare 08:20, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The fire lily (Lilium bulbiferum) after a rain. --George Chernilevsky 17:18, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good DOF --Ianare 08:23, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Malva dendromorpha. Lycaon 06:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Pleasant composition --Ianare 08:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Old houses in Tortosa, Catalonia, Spain. Lycaon 22:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Source of the Morava river on Králický Sněžník, Sudetes --Pudelek 19:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Sign a bit overexposed but OK --Ianare 08:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ruins of Liechtensteinschutzhaus mountain hostel, Sudetes --Pudelek 19:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture from Benno Elkan, Ostenfriedhof Dortmund --Mbdortmund 05:03, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Blurry and too bright- LadyofHats 14:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ducati SportClassic 1000S motorcycle, original photo modified by desaturating colours for 1960's-1970's retro/Lomoish look--Thermos 16:09, 21 June 2009 (UTC))
  • Decline Please remove vignetting. Maedin 18:14, 21 June 2009 (UTC) Uploaded new version with less vignette (which is actually added to the original for the "period" look) --Thermos 10:58, 22 June 2009 (UTC)* Oppose would gladly support other version, if it's nominated --Ianare 08:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scene of the Gay Pride of 27 June 2009 at the Place de la Bastille in Paris. Rama 09:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose All dark, out of focus. Yann 09:52, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scene of the Gay Pride of 27 June 2009 at the Place de la Bastille in Paris. Rama 09:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Soft, tilted, too dark. For better Gay Pride coverage see this example. --Iotatau 10:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scene of the Gay Pride of 27 June 2009 at the Place de la Bastille in Paris. Rama 09:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline No QI. For better Gay Pride coverage see this example. --Iotatau 10:51, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scene of the Gay Pride of 27 June 2009 at the Place de la Bastille in Paris. Rama 09:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Too dark, vignetting. For better Gay Pride coverage see this example. --Iotatau 10:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ribosome diagram explaining the translation of tRNA into proteins-LadyofHats 09:05, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. --Iotatau 11:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kayaker and sunset at the beach in Colington Harbour on Colington Island, North Carolina. --Jarekt 03:26, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline "Pretty" but too dark, bland composition. --Iotatau 11:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Helvellyn Striding Edge, Lake District, UK, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 16:06, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion David makes it difficult to find technical faults, I failed here :-) --Iotatau 11:16, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Street clock, Globe, Arizona --Bgag 15:57, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 16:46, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common walnut (Juglans regia) --George Chernilevsky 11:28, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Common subject, no flaws, good texture on fruits. --Iotatau 18:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Euphorbia griffithii. Maedin 08:36, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Overexposed in red channel. 3% of the image (346,463px) is pure red. Lycaon 18:17, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
    Damn, I hadn't noticed that. lol I give up ;-) Maedin 18:24, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
    Red flowers are notoriously difficult to get right, don't let them beat you ;-)). Lycaon 19:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
    Withdrawing. Maedin 21:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Epargyreus clarus Feeding on a Milkweed. Ram-Man 00:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion fine --Mbdortmund 16:54, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The open-air museum of Detmold (Germany) -- MJJR 20:56, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK. --Berthold Werner 12:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The open-air museum of Detmold (Germany) -- MJJR 20:56, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Zaun verdeckt leider unteren Teil der Gebäude --Mbdortmund 01:46, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
    It's the wall, not the fence(?) But still ok for me. --Berthold Werner 12:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The fire lily (Lilium bulbiferum) with ants. --George Chernilevsky 17:18, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good; like the composition. --Iotatau 18:07, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Joshua Tree National Park: The Blob Formation at Hidden Valley Campground. --Jarekt 13:23, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Seamless stitch. P.S. ... except some pixels at middle of top edge, please crop again. --Iotatau 19:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brighton Promenade, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 12:45, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion No stitching errors in spite of "moving objects". --Iotatau 11:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vincetoxicum hirundinaria. Lycaon 06:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Iotatau 18:03, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lotus cytisoides. Lycaon 06:26, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Iotatau 19:42, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dalibarda repens in bloom. --Jomegat 22:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok though white balance maybe blue-ish. --Iotatau 19:56, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A pano of the Bayer factories in Leverkusen, Germany --S^[1] 21:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn First: I recognize the time necessary to create such a pano and I find the subject very interesting. But I promote with hesitation. There is some CA, there are stitching glitches (dark vertical bands in the sky, uneven horizontal lines). Which stitching program do you use? I like PTGui. --Iotatau 20:18, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
    One of the conditions for QI with panos is a flawless stitching. Also lacking crispness, tilt at the extremes and CA disturb. A panorama can't excel the quality of its constituting parts.Lycaon 17:57, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
    Withdrawn, a better version is in preparation S^[1] 22:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of an elephant - the symbol of Králický Sněžník, Sudetes --Pudelek 19:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion An elephant at an unusual place. --Iotatau 17:24, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Joshua Trees (Yucca brevifolia) at sunrise in Joshua Tree National Park near Hidden Valley Campground. --Jarekt 14:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment A special tree but I struggle with the framing. --Iotatau 19:59, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
     Comment recropped and removed a tree fragment on the left edge --Jarekt 02:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
    Ok now. --Iotatau 07:05, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Fomes fomentarius on the living birch (Betula). --George Chernilevsky 08:50, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Phellinus igniarius on the dead birch (Betula). --George Chernilevsky 08:50, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Limodorum abortivum. Lycaon 04:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Rare, good subject isolation. --Iotatau 17:56, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Glatzer Schneeberg (Králický Sněžník, Śnieżnik) - view from mountain --Pudelek 07:04, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok. --Iotatau 11:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Gallotia galloti LC0216.jpg

• Nomination Juvenile male Tenerife Lizard (Gallotia galloti) --LC-de 15:46, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Comment crop distracting --Mbdortmund 04:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Opposefind it a bit strange that the head is so dark and the tail already so bright, the composition is also a bit plain and maybe sounds silly but the overexosed white spot on the rock anoys me.. even when it is only that spot... so aybe someone else wnats to say something about it-LadyofHats 09:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   Lycaon 17:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Thomas_Bresson_-_Syrphidae_sp._(by)_(2).jpg

• Nomination Syrphidae sp. on a flower --ComputerHotline 14:36, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support QI. --kallerna 14:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not identified. Lycaon 18:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Should be identified for QI, VI, FP which isn't complicated with that angle Richard Bartz 23:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose as above, it should be identified-LadyofHats 09:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   Lycaon 17:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Thomas_Bresson_-_Diptera_sp._(by).jpg

• Nomination Diptera in a flower. --ComputerHotline 14:36, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support interesting --Mbdortmund 17:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Diptera? What about an id? Lycaon 18:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose not identified-LadyofHats 09:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Lycaon 17:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

File:2008-05-23 05 Road No 1 at Jökuldalsheiði.jpg

• Nomination Panoramic view along Iceland's road No 1 at Jökuldalsheiði --Simisa 09:36, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Beautiful. --kallerna 18:03, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Appears badly tilted to me. --Yerpo 09:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose bad exposition, dark at the left too bright on the right -LadyofHats 09:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Lycaon 17:28, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Crimean_wine_Dzhevat-Kara_2009_G1.jpg

• Nomination Red Crimean dessert wine "The Dzhevat-Kara" ("The Black Colonel"). A crop 1997. --George Chernilevsky 08:56, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Na zdorove! --Daniel Case 02:10, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Sorry, but the arrangement is really odd. The table plate is distracting too much. --Afrank99 11:51, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Strange composition, idea is nice. -- Pro2 11:07, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Thank you, Pro2, about idea comment --George Chernilevsky 15:14, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   George Chernilevsky 09:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Raindrops sizes.svg

• Nomination Different raindrop sizes. Pbroks13 07:21, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Very good work, QI --George Chernilevsky 08:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• Please check your dimensions, I never saw half meter raindrops ;-). Lycaon 09:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• also some of the arrows on the back are of the same color as the drops and give the impresion of a pointy bottom on them-LadyofHats 10:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• My mistake, i now wait for correction this image. Possible mkm, not mm need. --George Chernilevsky 10:45, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • You haven't seen half meter raindrops? They're just really rare ;). Okay, numbers fixed and the arrow should look better now. Pbroks13 17:27, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Simple but good. Lycaon 18:09, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support useful and informative --Ianare 22:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support-LadyofHats 08:19, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose The legends on (b) and (c) are the wrong way around, surely (b) represents the shape when "< 2mm" (smaller than 2mm). --Tony Wills 12:34, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Oh wow, and to think, I'm a math major. They actually all should have been switched, so it should actually make sense now. Pbroks13 (talk) 16:28, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

• Ok, I think that makes sense (although the big arrow pointing to ">5mm" initially makes me think the resulting split raindrops are bigger than 5mm, but I see now it describes what happens to >5mm drops ;-) --Tony Wills (talk) 22:13, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Everything should be good now :). Yarl 16:31, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 09:09, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Pyrochroa coccinea (side).jpg

• Nomination Pyrochroa coccinea. Lycaon 08:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose strange composition , not really good in focus-LadyofHats 22:12, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I'd love a second opinion on this one. Lycaon 05:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• weak  Support I like the composition and colours, it is useful, but DOF could IMHO be better. --Mbdortmund 19:32, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose per LadyofHats.--Mbz1 22:22, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose not a good depth. --Estrilda 05:39, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 10:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Gerste Ähren.jpg

• Nomination Barley (Hordeum vulgare) on a field near Höchberg, Germany --Carport 13:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Nice --High Contrast 15:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Hmmm? 9.9% of the image is pure white! Lycaon 18:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
   Comment White, ok, but the focus of this image is definately on the ear of this plant - this is no panorama image or landscape showing media file. The fractional white sky emphasises the foreground - in my view. --High Contrast 19:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Supportthe exposition is tricky but the subject and the composition are really good. IMO is a QI. if well not perfect-LadyofHats 22:11, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition, the objects of interest are perfectly exposed and sharp. Background isn't important here. TimVickers 21:28, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose as per Lycaon --George Chernilevsky 12:53, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Schade, die Ähren sind wirklich gut drauf, aber der Hintergrund ist doch zu sehr abgesoffen. --Mbdortmund 18:12, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose clearly not QI with that background. --Dschwen 02:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 10:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Gay Pride mg 7324.jpg

• Nomination Scene of the Gay Pride of 27 June 2009 at the Place de la Bastille in Paris. Rama 09:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support This one's ok. People's faces are usually more interesting than their backsides. --Iotatau 10:55, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment: No. Photographs of people from behind are candid shots. Photographs showing faces are people posing and showing off for photophers. With the limitations entailed by privacy considerations, the backsides are in fact more interesting. Rama 11:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose low quality, мistake frontal illumination. Lots of chromatic aberration. With a photo flash it could be better. --George Chernilevsky 14:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose as above-LadyofHats 22:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose The person on the left side is really too dark IMHO --Mbdortmund 18:13, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   George Chernilevsky 09:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Moshi panorama.jpg

• Nomination Moshi panorama --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 20:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support A nice panorama — too bad it's so small... I'm not sure if a height of 870px is considered to be enough for QI. --Till.niermann 18:01, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Guidelines suggest "Panoramic images need to have a minimum height of 800px" so quite adequate for QI guidelines. An attractive panorama, but there are too many over exposed white walls. If it was just some of the clouds then I would consider it, but as detail on many white house walls is lost too, I can not support it. --Tony Wills (talk) 10:49, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose- independly from the size it is too brigt-LadyofHats 22:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose as LadyofHats and vertical size to small. Lycaon 17:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   George Chernilevsky 09:05, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Central Silesian Park - Mounted police 02.jpg

• Nomination Mounted police in Central Silesian Park --Yarl 18:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Ok. --Iotatau 23:17, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose not sharp --Ianare 08:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose blury-LadyofHats 22:06, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   George Chernilevsky 09:04, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Poppy from the side.JPG

• Nomination Poppy from side. --Jolly Janner 00:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Comment needs proper ID (genus would be OK) --Ianare 00:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Done, looks like papaver. --Jolly Janner 14:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC
•  Oppose Identification insufficient. Lycaon 05:05, 27 June 2009 (UTC))

Can you elaborate on how it is insufficient, so I can improve it?

For an easy garden plant, a species identification is not too much asked. Lycaon 18:09, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Looks like an Opium Poppy (papaver somniferum) per File:Papaversomniferum.jpg. I will now update the file description pages. Jolly Janner 19:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, there goes my oppose. Lycaon 19:20, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose overexposed, not too sharp --Ianare 08:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose lack of sharpness. --High Contrast 08:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   George Chernilevsky 09:02, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Poppy from above.JPG

• Nomination Poppy from above. --Jolly Janner 00:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Comment needs proper ID (genus would be OK) --Ianare 00:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Done, looks like papaver. --Jolly Janner 14:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC
•  Oppose Identification insufficient. Lycaon 05:05, 27 June 2009 (UTC))

Can you elaborate on how it is insufficient, so I can improve it?

See other nom. Lycaon 19:22, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

•  Support OK --Ianare 08:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 09:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Vorderhopfreben Üntschenspitze.jpg

• Nomination 180° Panoramic of Alp in Vorarlberg --Böhringer 21:36, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support nice --Mbdortmund 22:42, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Left corner, bottom: black relict from the image-rework. Should be corrected. --High Contrast 11:32, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Oppose not changed by now --High Contrast 15:18, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support corrected --High Contrast 08:36, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support I take the liberty to convert your "Oppose" to a "Support" after the correction. --Iotatau 19:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC) I wouldn't do that (too controversial, you might as well change all votes then). Lycaon 13:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose per High Contrast, and also vignetting in the sky. Lycaon 18:04, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support true it is overexposed, but i dont think it has lost a lot of detail from it. -LadyofHats 09:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose - per others -- Pro2 11:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Contacted author on his talk page. --Iotatau 16:59, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose sky is unequal. --Estrilda 05:39, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Done & Danke --Böhringer 19:18, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promote?   --Eusebius 10:39, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Protected Sea Turtle Nest (Boca Raton FL).jpg

• Nomination Protected sea turtle nest --Ianare 08:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Instructive, good focus on subject. --Iotatau 22:11, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose i disagree. the composition is plain simple the image has few contrast- would like another opinions in this one-LadyofHats 08:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

• LOL. when I take a picture with nice composition it's rejected because you can't see the nest well enough, when the nest is the only subject and much larger people complain the composition is boring. I'm starting to think people just don't like turtle nests ... --Ianare 03:52, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh I do love turtle nests, my only opinion is that the sand is very bad thing to take an image of, becouse of the few contrast the image lacks dimension. and everything is centered. you dont need to make a strange angle to have a good composition. i think by example with a side light the sand would have offered a richer surface.-LadyofHats 08:16, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

•  Support fine for me. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I don't think this has FP quality, but we are talking here about QI quality - and this picture meets most of the requirements IMO: sharpness, DOF, colours, straightforward but effective composition, encyclopedic value. Only the contrast is a weak point: about that I agree with LadyofHats -- MJJR 21:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 09:30, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Leishmaniasis life cycle diagram en.svg

• Nomination Leishmaniasis life cycle-LadyofHats 09:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• Decline QI, as usual. Lycaon 05:38, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  One typo left, "divition" at left border. --Iotatau 06:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  actually i had to change a great part of it. becouse of soe feedback from wikipedia. but it should be aright now. including the typo-LadyofHats 08:20, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
  A few comments, first typo, should say "Transform into amastigotes", second "amastigotes infect other cells or are phagocytosed" would be better as "amastigotes infect new macrophages", third only procyclic promastigotes replicate as they differentiate into non-replicative metacyclic promastigotes before migrating into the pharanyx, fourth the importance of granulocyte invasion versus macrophage invasion is still controversial so I'd recommend mentioning that the metacyclics might simply invade macrophages upon entry into the mammalian host. TimVickers 21:44, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• i will change it acording to the sugestions and then nominate it again.-LadyofHats 08:17, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose and decline since LadyofHats wants to nominate a new version. This old one has now been stagnant for eight days. --Iotatau 06:24, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

File:ComputerHotline - Syrphidae sp. (by) (7).jpg

• Nomination Syrphidae copulation --ComputerHotline 19:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Not identified (tip: search in subfamily Syrphinae). Lycaon 07:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Identification is no criterion. --ComputerHotline 07:53, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Iotatau 21:32, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

File:ComputerHotline - Diptera sp. (by) (6).jpg

• Nomination Diptera enjoying with foam coming out of demijohn. --ComputerHotline 19:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Not identified (Diptera??). Tip: Search in family Calliphoridae. Lycaon 07:31, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Identification is no criterion. --ComputerHotline 07:53, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose "Quality images must be categorized, have a meaningful title and description. This should include the Taxa naming for organisms." --Mbdortmund 09:59, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Iotatau 06:04, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Ship_M_I_Pirogov_Vinnitsa_2006_G2.jpg

• Nomination Vinnitsa, Ukraine. View from a bridge to the Southern Bug river. --George Chernilevsky 13:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
  
•  Oppose Technically average, value for Wikimedia? -- H005 16:41, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  
•  Comment read more about en:Southern Bug value. It is a river 806 km long --George Chernilevsky 18:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  
•  Support IMHO OK --Mbdortmund 01:42, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Iotatau 20:42, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination --George Chernilevsky (talk) 06:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Fly and bug June 2009-1.jpg

• Nomination A fly and a bug preparing to take off -- Alvesgaspar 23:02, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support nice --Mbdortmund 09:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose seams blurry in full resolution --LC-de 15:26, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Pretty good and interesting. --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 18:33, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very small DOF, not QI :-(. Nice composition. --George Chernilevsky 06:28, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support very interesting composition. i think it would be hard to get it sharper by that size of objects-LadyofHats 09:07, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose - per George Chernilevsky -- Pro2 11:25, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Difficult case. But I think on balance that the lack of depth of field is mitigated by the fact that there is little alternative. Very difficult to persuade two bugs to not move at all while you take multiple exposures to do focus stacking. --Tony Wills 11:07, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose not a good depth. --Estrilda 05:40, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support nice --ComputerHotline 08:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support DOF is ok in my opinion. I like the composition. --High Contrast 17:17, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promote?   Lycaon 17:46, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Agia_Galini_R01.jpg

• Nomination Agia Galini (Crete, Greece) -- MJJR 19:35, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
  
•  Oppose Technically ok, but boring subject and composition. --H005 10:28, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Boring? Perhaps. That's a personal appreciation, which I respect. But what about informative value? Commons is about more than aesthetics only. I'd like a second opinion here, if possible... -- MJJR 20:26, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Focus, colors, lighting are good, let's make it a "discuss". What's the street name? Are these public or private buildings? --Iotatau 07:28, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Info This image is illustrative for the typical (private) houses along the narrow, steep streets in a Cretan village built on the rocky slopes of the southern coast. For the exact location: see the geocoding. -- MJJR 15:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Iotatau 15:35, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Technically OK → QI. Lycaon 20:05, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Smial 09:54, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   Lycaon 17:37, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

File:ComputerHotline - Syrphidae sp. (by) (2).jpg

• Nomination Hoverfly. --ComputerHotline 19:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
  
•  Comment According to the guidelines two submissions per day are ok. I now see six in a row so I stop promoting. --Iotatau 20:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not identified (tip: search in subfamily Syrphinae). Lycaon 07:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Identification is no criterion. --ComputerHotline 07:53, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• this picture and the next one are not displayed here --Mbdortmund 09:38, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   Lycaon 17:38, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

File:02 Ovis orientalis aries portrait.jpg

• Nomination Ovis orientalis aries, lambs Richard Bartz 11:56, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
  
•  Oppose Too low DOF, diffuse light -- H005 21:53, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• Frage: Stimmt das leicht Rötliche im Fell oder ist das ein Farbstich? --Mbdortmund 00:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Es muß das Fell sein, sonst wäre der Rest ja auch Rotstichig. bg Richard Bartz 14:48, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose This one's not sharp. Cute, though. --Afrank99 12:26, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Lycaon 17:40, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Chainsaw.JPG

• Nomination Chainsaw in action. (One of the first photos with my new camera.) --kallerna 17:09, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
   Support Good. I like how you caught the sawdust. --Iotatau 17:20, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose not sharp, possible saw vibration result. I'm sorry, idea really great --George Chernilevsky 18:50, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose it is sharp but the saw is out of focus! And for wikipedia is the picture bed, because of safty reasons, don't saw in this way! HBR 20:37, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment The saw is in focus. The motor isn't as sharp the saw, but IMO it's sharp enough. Why would it be unsafe to saw like this? --kallerna 17:39, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Very good. Sharp enough. --Afrank99 12:24, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Congratulations with your new camera (I use the same), but focus is not sufficient. I'd happily support on VI though: this action shot is IMO the best of the whole category (just needs geocoding). Lycaon 17:54, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment Geocoding can be easily added. Wait 5 mins. --kallerna 17:57, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
    •  Comment Done. --kallerna 17:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Info I made VI-nomination. --kallerna 18:08, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   George Chernilevsky 07:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Berlin_Central_Station_opening_(2006).jpg

• Nomination Berlin main station opening. --Iotatau 09:02, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support I wish the hand in the lower left corner was not there, but otherwise a good image.--Mbz1 12:54, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not really sharp, overexpoed, bad crop, hand in the left corner --Pro2 15:08, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Exposure: check histogram, if anything the image is on average underexposed. Sharpness: the tripod was 3 m from a loudspeaker with maybe 110 dB → vibrations. But still at least as sharp as other recently promoted images. Framing/hand: tight crowd (half a million people). --Iotatau 23:12, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Exposure is quite right, sharpness ok, can't see an issue with the crop. The hand is a pity, agreed, but overall a great picture. -- H005 22:28, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support as H005 -- MJJR 19:39, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Please add your vote over the QICtotal box -- Pro2 23:44, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose As Pro2 (without the overexposure). Lycaon 20:08, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   Lycaon 17:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Oberflaechenpiercing IMGP8092-2.jpg

• Nomination piercing by Smial --Mbdortmund 20:36, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  weak oppose Nice quality, but small size: 1.5 Megapixels only --George Chernilevsky 21:00, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• the picture is strictly reduced to the important elements, it would be easy to bring it over the 2 MP by adding some unimportant elements; everything is sharp and shows good details as far as I see. I think it's acceptable --Mbdortmund 11:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment if promotion for 1.5 Mp possible, then i can to change my vote. Photo really nice --George Chernilevsky 13:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment The strictly reduced picture should just have a higher resolution. This is not a reason to promote undersized images, sorry. Lycaon 20:12, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Albeit the low resolution, everything is clear and sharp and, as the subject is very simple, the resolution is good enough to show all objects in sufficient detail. -- H005 22:31, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• Ok, i now  Neutral. Rules can be broken in this case --George Chernilevsky 07:27, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support ack, H005 --EvaK 08:49, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose below 2 megapixels --High Contrast 17:11, 11 July 2009 (UTC); Ok now:  Support --High Contrast 06:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose below 2 megapixels, size mitigation is not an option on QI. Lycaon 20:09, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Concerns addressed. Lycaon 06:29, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose really good, but below minimum resolution. If the size requirement is not really a rule, I maybe should consider re-nominating this one --Afrank99 12:09, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support Now it's great. --Afrank99 19:32, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Now uploaded full resolution. -- Smial 23:06, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Meets resolution requirements now. Pbroks13 00:47, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 07:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC))

File:Grossmarkthalle Frankfurt Panorama 1.jpg

• Nomination Panoramic of the Großmarkthalle in Frankfurt am Main, May 2007 --EvaK 19:06, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• Decline  Oppose Subject too dark IMHO -- H005 10:42, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
   Comment Have a brighter display. Or explain what you exactly mean with "too dark" --EvaK 18:42, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
  My display is bright enough. Today I am sitting in front of a different PC and it still is too dark. What part of "too dark" don't you understand? Of course the overall brightness is ok, but the main subject is the building and this is IMHO too dark. Not dark enough to strictly oppose, but too dark to support it.
  Another issue, albeit only a slight issue is the artificial sharpening, at least it looks to me as if it has been sharpened. A bit over the top IMHO, but acceptable. -- H005 15:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral (sharpness is ok on this one, but suboptimal lighting) I guess it's "too dark" due to unfortunate weather on location. Anyway, I don't know why this image is in the discussion section. It has been declined after review from a user and there hasn't been any veto from any other reviewer. So it's declined. Please respect the QI procedure. And Eva, by the way, please don't always tell people that they have bad LCD screens. I'm using a color calibrated NEC SpectraView - and see the same. --Afrank99 17:29, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• That's what I call pixelpicking. I've a calibrated Eizo and no problems with brightness. --EvaK 17:36, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • In fact exposure is ok, but the lighting is just kind of dull (that's why I neither support nor oppose) --Afrank99 18:16, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Oversharpening has produced halos on dark/light interfaces. Lycaon 12:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Lycaon 19:15, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Hoechster Mainpanorama August 2007.jpg

• Nomination Panoramic of the Main river bank and old town wall in Frankfurt-Höchst --EvaK 01:43, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
• Decline Basically a very nice image, but just way too blurry. --Afrank99 08:30, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
   CommentEspecially for you I removed the birds and contrails from the sky. Now it's up to you to clean your display. --EvaK 18:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
   Comment What have you done? It's worse now with large areas of gaussian blur. Did you ever look at this image at pixel level? --Afrank99 21:25, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
   CommentNot more than 100% I don't pitch on every pixel at 300+ percent. --EvaK 10:05, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
   Comment There's a new build of the panoramic. --Eva K. ^{is evil} 14:44, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Why is this in the discussion area? There is no supporting vote, so it is declined. (and the image is still lacking sharpness) --Afrank99 17:24, 13 July 2009 (UTC)#
•  Comment Get yourself some new glasses. --EvaK 17:38, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment Evak, please stay mellow. Lycaon 17:40, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment It is in the CR because the author asked for a second opinion, which is allowed. Lycaon 17:38, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment ok, well then! I'm curious! --Afrank99 18:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Stiching error in bottom left; not very sharp. Pbroks13 03:21, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Pbroks13 (talk) 03:23, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Fort l'Écluse, inférieur-retouché.jpg

• Nomination Fort l'Écluse, retouched by Carlotto. Yann 23:37, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
• I like the view, but I dislike manipulations of that kind. The power lines are there, and I would support the original photo. -- Smial 19:39, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't understand your argument. The power lines do not bring anything useful in this picture. Why do you want to keep them if they can be removed? Yann 23:20, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I believe media on commons should have priority on realistic illustrations, not on "nice" images. But this is naturally only one, my opinion. -- Smial 23:25, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Quality is fine and manipulations are properly disclosed. I see no problem. Lycaon 23:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral I'd oppose to the manipulation if it would change the main subject, but I have no problem if something in its environment that hinders the view on the subject is removed and if this is proprly stated, as is the case here. However, in my opinion the image is too dark. -- H005 09:20, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
  • The bright parts (the rocks and the walls) are already white. How could it be brighter? Yann 17:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
    • By adjusting the gamma curve, for example? Particularly if you have it in RAW format it should be a no-brainer. HDRI would be another option, of course not through postprocessing. -- H005 20:00, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
      • Lycaon made a brightened version: File:Fort l'Écluse, inférieur-retouché brightened.jpg. Yann 17:54, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   Lycaon 19:13, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Pieta mg 6751.jpg

• Nomination 15th Century Pieta in Senlis cathedrale -- Rama 13:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good -- H005 12:26, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Head of Maria is cropped. --Berthold Werner 12:45, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support This image is not about Maria but Jesus. I prefer this image to the one with the bright window in the background. --Iotatau 16:05, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I have to agree with Berthold Werner, a pieta is about the Virgin Mary holding a dead Jesus, so something is missing in the composition. Lycaon 17:43, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad crop. Yann 18:00, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Rama, renaming might help to get it through. --Iotatau 20:09, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   Lycaon 19:11, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Beilstein BW 0.JPG

• Nomination Germany, Beilstein at the river Mosel, view from the Castle Metternich --Berthold Werner 15:17, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
  
•  Support Good panorama. --Iotatau 18:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too blurry, some chromatic aberrations -- H005 10:37, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support not perfect, but good composition and value --Mbdortmund 14:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support agree Mbdortmund, quality enough --George Chernilevsky 05:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 06:37, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Kosciol sw Katarzyny w Korczewie.jpg

• Nomination Church of St. Catherine in Korczew, Poland --Chrumps 00:39, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
  
•  Comment I'd say it's good, but it seems to be a little tilted to the right.--Tupungato 17:23, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Good shot. I've reduced some CA, tilt, and distortion. Please review. -- Smial 10:30, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment For an unknown reason the thumbnail of this image and two other ones don't show up for me, on two different PCs, with two different browsers, after repeated purges and page refreshs. --Iotatau (talk) 06:15, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
• just like here --Mbdortmund 15:29, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support good for me after correction --George Chernilevsky 05:06, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 06:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Bytom - Muzeum Górnośląskie 02.jpg

• Nomination Upper Silesian Museum in Bytom --Yarl 10:32, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
  
•  Comment Darker spots on the sky. Sensor dust, probably. It can be easily removed. I don't think it should be "quality image" with sensor spots.--Tupungato 17:21, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose faults not fixed. Lycaon 09:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   Lycaon 19:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

File:01 Ovis orientalis aries portrait.jpg

• Nomination Ovis orientalis aries Richard Bartz 11:56, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
  
•  Oppose Lack of sharpness, diffuse light -- H005 21:53, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I like it --Mbdortmund 00:49, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
• Lack of sharpness ?? Can you show me a non-oversharpened example with the same resolution please ? Richard Bartz 15:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

I don't think it's relevant for QI whether there aren't any better pictures, that argument is only valid for COM:VI. The sharpness of the face is excellent, just the body isn't. But my oppose is only weak, if Mbdortmund or others support it, ok. -- H005 12:36, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Can you please explain to me what do you mean with diffuse light ? Is it underexposed or overexposed ? Is direct sunlight a quality feature ? Available light and to shadow my subjects is part of my photographic style/preference. Richard Bartz 14:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

•  Support For me it's a "portrait", as the file name says, and body sharpness is not important. Overcast light and no sun help to keep the dynamic range in check. I am not a fan of the fence in the background but overall I consider it to be a QI. --Iotatau 17:27, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support When background is sharp, I would change to 'oppose'; I like it this way. Sumurai8 20:44, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Very good. --Afrank99 12:25, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Yellowish background a bit annoying, so it can't be FP, but at any rate QI. Sharp, fine details. -- Smial 10:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• Go ahead and promote it, my oppose is much to weak to withstand a single strong support, let alone 5. (Btw @Richard, my preference is sunlight. :-)) -- H005 17:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   Lycaon 19:08, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Cygnus columbianus bewickii.JPG

• Nomination She was sleeping, I took the picture :D Abigor 20:11, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good.--Mbz1 22:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Underexposed and head OOF. Lycaon 07:41, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too much shadow --H005 22:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Sumurai8 20:39, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose lack of details, to much background --Mbdortmund 09:40, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Head out of focus, and too much shadow. --Afrank99 17:36, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice scene, but focus should be on the head. -- Smial 12:23, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Decline?   Lycaon 19:08, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Joshua Trees in Joshua Tree NP 2.jpg

• Nomination Joshua Trees (Yucca brevifolia) at sunrise in Joshua Tree National Park: Hidden Valley Campground --Jarekt 03:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Excellent shot. Could even run for FP, IMHO. -- H005 06:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Rather noisy, not QI for me. Lycaon 06:14, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment Actually I can hardly see any noise at all, it's very little noise considering the light conditions. -- H005 12:25, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Really rare colours situations. I oppose it as QI, but support as FI (if nominated) -- George Chernilevsky 18:44, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
   Question How can something be FP but not QI? I believe that FP requirements basically include all QI requirements. -- H005 12:49, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Reduced some VLF-Noise, please reload. -- Smial 15:16, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Lycaon 19:16, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Bytom - Państwowe Szkoły Budownictwa.jpg

• Nomination Building high school in Bytom --Yarl 10:32, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
  
•  Comment Darker spots on the sky. Sensor dust, probably. It can be easily removed. I don't think it should be "quality image" with sensor spots.--Tupungato 17:21, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I am less worried about the spot(s) (I could find only one, and that one couls be removed easily), but to me it looks very distorted. -- H005 20:15, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support A few (very light) spots on the sky indeed, which can easily be corrected - Please do it! The 'distortion' is mostly due to perspective correction, and is rather an improvement IMO. Otherwise everything seems OK: sharpness, colours, light, composition. So → QI for me. -- MJJR 18:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  •  Question Sorry, can you shed some light on how distortion can be a positive result of perspective correction? I thought the goal of perspective correction is to remove distortion. I am a tad confused now. -- H005 18:42, 14 July 2009 (UTC) --  Comment When you correct the perspective distortion of the vertical lines in your picture, the horizontals which are not perfectly horizontal show often some unnatural distortion: their obliquity is accentuated. This is an inevitable effect that also occurs with even the best shift-lenses. I think this is the case here. -- MJJR 12:52, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but an image with dust spots can not be promoted. Lycaon 07:11, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Lycaon 12:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

File:C-Band Doppler tutka, Korppoo, Länsi-Turunmaa.JPG

• Nomination C-Band Doppler weather radar. --Makele-90 17:45, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support -- H005 19:36, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment IMO tilted cw. --Mbdortmund 22:26, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Info Better now ? --Makele-90 11:44, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Better now :-) -- Smial 12:19, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  • IMHO not, as the head almost touches the top image border, something that already bothered me with the previous version and has now become worse. Maybe you can add some more blue sky above??? -- H005 12:23, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Rather strong CA (especially in the upper half) is bothering me. Lycaon 12:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose CA, overcontrasted and composition error: too small top and bottom margins --George Chernilevsky 12:48, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose crop too tight --High Contrast 17:44, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Question Would you like to some blue sky above or is this image lost ? --Makele-90 20:36, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

 Comment If properly done, that would help. Chromatic aberration is visible, but only if you look very close, not really an issue IMO.-- H005 20:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose Too tight crop, CA. --kallerna 20:24, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 11:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Bug June 2009-5.jpg

• Nomination A weird bug (Syromastes rhombeus) -- Alvesgaspar 23:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Location would be nice --Mbdortmund 23:22, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose DOF is very shallow. #!George Shuklin 21:09, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support not to bad for QI --Böhringer 21:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 11:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Middelgrunden wind farm 2009-07-01 edit filtered.jpg

• Nomination Middelgrunden offshore wind farm (40 MW) on in glossy sea state --Slaunger 09:41, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Comment I spot a few spots. Lycaon 09:54, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Thanks for noticing. I've cloned out five spots. Hope I got'em all - gee I am surprised my sensor is already dirty. --Slaunger 10:41, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Very beautiful.--Mbz1 03:03, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• There is noise and the windmills are not straight. Estrilda 05:42, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• the noise could IMO be accepted because of the composition and the graphical effect but the perspective should be corrected --Mbdortmund 11:47, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose per author's remark. Lycaon 21:16, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment If skewness (horizon, poles) is removed, I'll support it. -- H005 22:33, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I'd like to support this if there was dust removal, less skewness and less JPG compression and therefore less artefacts and noise. --EvaK 09:07, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose JPEG artifacts, too much noise (it blurs any single edge), and horizontality (which could be corrected). Sorry, nice composition! --Eusebius 11:36, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm confident there will be a new improved version as soon as Slaunger is back. Lycaon 17:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Eusebius. --kallerna 20:26, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   kallerna 20:26, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Orthodox_church_Vinnitsa_S_Bug_2007_G1.jpg

• Nomination: Orthodox church in Vinnytsia, Ukraine. The Southern Bug river bank. --George Chernilevsky 13:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• Review
•  Neutral Noise, but not bad enough to decline. --Afrank99 19:08, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment The tower in the centre of the picture is partly overexposed, loss of detail. --Eusebius 20:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose -> unassessed --Eusebius 07:27, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Hidden Valley Campground - Joshua Tree NP.jpg

• Nomination: Joshua Tree National Park: Hidden Valley Campground from the "Space-station" the hole half way up the Chimney Rock Formation. --Jarekt 03:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• Review
•  Support Good, although post-shot sharpening is visible, or am I wrong? -- H005 06:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
   Comment it has been a year and half since I took this photograph and I do not recall doing anything special to it.--Jarekt 12:55, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
   Oppose Actually it's not very sharp (lacking details) and has a lot of CA. No QI for me. --Afrank99 19:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
   Comment I've seen several photos from these Kodak cameras, all tend to blur the image in regions of low contrast to supress noise - and, on the other hand, tend to sharpen to much in parts of high contrast. That is very annoying, as this shot is a very good idea, but technically insufficient. Above all image should be rotated ccw. -- Smial 14:54, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose -> draw --Eusebius 07:26, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Orage à Annemasse.jpg

• Nomination Lightning in Annemasse, France. Yann 10:17, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose The camera has been moved during exposure, the image of the lightnings on the left and on the right (and of the buildings) is doubled. --Eusebius 11:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment This one was pretty close and violent, so it is possible that the camera shaked. But if the double lightnings would be caused by the camera move, everything would be doubled, isn't? Yann 00:09, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment If you look to the lightening on the left side and right sides, it's doubled as well. That can't be the camera moving, it would smear, not double. My guess is it's caused by reflection. --Calibas 02:17, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment If you look at the building, you see two images as well, a strong one, and a hollow one (due to a camera vertical move of the camera), and this is not reflection. Not every lightning is doubled because exposure time is 30s and lightnings don't last for 30s. The lightning on the left, for instance, had one flash before the move and one flash after the move, but all the flashes of the centre lightning occured either before or after the move. --Eusebius 07:19, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination Probably you are right. Yann 13:48, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Karadjordje Belgrade.jpg

• Nomination Karađorđe Petrović monument in Belgrade, Serbia --MRB 16:18, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion Nice photography, but does not illustrate/document the subject very well. (or take it this way: main subject heavily underexposed) --Afrank99 08:48, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I like it. --Mbdortmund 22:08, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Underexposure is obviously an artistic selection here. It makes the image look much more menacing and mysterious, especially combined with the overcast sky. The framing of ground and sky makes excellent use of the rule of thirds. A casual viewer might even confuse the statue for a living person. Really like this photo. --Ferengi (talk) 06:58, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support as Ferengi -- MJJR 21:20, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   Berthold Werner 12:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Verzasca Hut.JPG

• Nomination Dry stone Hut in Verzasca valley, Switzerland --H005 06:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  SupportInteresting and well tech Albertus teolog 08:30, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Oversaturated, see green channel. --Eusebius 10:41, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  •  Info The saturation has not been changed by postprocessing, the grass really was so green up there. See what happens to the trees if you take out saturation. -- H005 22:11, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I really like this photo, so I took the liberty of reducing the saturation in the grass area (overall reduction of the green channel made the trees look dull). Please re-evaluate. --Ferengi 06:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Honestly, I can't find again the reason why I first opposed, sorry, it must have been a mistake. --Eusebius (talk) 07:25, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius (talk) 07:25, 24 July 2009 (UTC)