Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 18 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Locatie, Lendevallei. Petgat 06.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Location, Lendevallei in Netherlands. Petgat.
    --Famberhorst 15:23, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:43, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
     OpposeTo me this looks tilted CW. Please check the horizon. --Code 09:00, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
    ✓ Done. Thank you.--Famberhorst 15:53, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Sorry, Famberhorst. I forgot about this. --Code 21:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok, for me. --Marrovi 19:37, 15 July 2016 (UTC).
  •  Support Very good composition and beautiful colors -- Spurzem 15:13, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 03:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Feuille_de_chêne_à_contre-jour.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Feuille de chêne à contre-jour --Ant°AM 19:04, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry,the part in focus in very small respect all the picture --Livioandronico2013 20:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment I disagree, small focus is voluntary and is the point of the picture (macro photo) --Ant°AM 06:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I think, it is an intentionally play with DOF. The main subject is visible clear. --Hubertl 19:39, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support per Hubertl --Tsungam 07:25, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support as others -- Smial 10:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 13:44, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Pirot Central Square.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Pirot Central Square. --MrPanyGoff 18:54, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry the DoF isn't good especially on the left...non very sharp --Livioandronico2013 20:14, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment It is sharp enough for me.--MrPanyGoff 05:59, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough. --Tsungam 07:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --C messier 06:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 13:44, 17 July 2016 (UTC)