Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 28 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Le Chateau Trakai (Lituanie) (6).JPG[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 09:20, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riga The Three Brothers.-Latvijas Arhitektūras muzejs (4).JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Les Trois Frères (Riga), Riga, Lettonie Cour intérieure du Musée letton de l'Architecture.- --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Little tight over the bow, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:15, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose poor cut with white edges (fixable), poor sharpness (not fixable), all in all not a QI for me --A.Savin 23:55, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment I' upload a new version, taking into account your comments. Please can you take a new regard . --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  I withdraw my nomination poor sharpness (not fixable)--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:18, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:44, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Norwegen-Bekkarfjord-2014-P1290448.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hike to River Laggo near Bekkarfjord --Ermell 14:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:38, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Problem with DoF, upper part should have been sharp; also burnt sky --A.Savin 23:58, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Wrong focus, overexposed, oversharpened, too high contrast. -- Smial 13:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)~
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:44, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Riga, l'Ambassade de France en Lettonie.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination French Embassy, Riga.- Latvia Lettonie.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:40, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:17, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not OK for me, lacking sharpness, and these strange retouching issues on stairs. --A.Savin 14:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
     Comment I removed the garden and I corrected strange retouching issues on stairs. I also slightly increased the sharpness of the image. Perhaps it's better?--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Hmmm... Whats the yellow thing on the middle window downstairs? Have you taken the picture out of the bus behind the screen? Looks like the curtain of the bus window. I agree A.Savin concerning the sharpness. If it's retouched (removed something from the stairs), I would use {{Retouched picture}} and explain what I have done. -- DerFussi 07:38, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment Thank you for your advices.- The image was taken on the road and not in a bus, I removed the plants that decorated the front porch and corrected the inclianison. See the original photo on which I had modified the pavements .-- Pierre André (talk) 10:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
      • I have done annotations. I don't know what these yellow things are. I thought its a kind of reflection/mirroring that often happens when you take a photo out of a bus. -- DerFussi 17:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  I withdraw my nomination  Thank you. you for your avis.- Maybe with age my memory fails. Yet I am convinced he took this photo outside the bus, on Raiņa bulvāris. Anyway, I had not noticed these yellow spots. They do not give a high quality image.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 07:35, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 19:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)