Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 26 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Villeneuve d'Ascq, le lac du Héron en hiver 2016 (1).jpg[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 08:41, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Markt,_Pößneck,_Panorama,_160117,_ako.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Spherical panoramic of the marketplace of Pößneck (Thuringia, Germany) in winter. To be viewed in the 360° panoramic viewer! --Code 07:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Sharp photo. In first instance I really needed to make larger to find out from which you made a photo. Well, the foreground gave me a total different idea. I don't know how far perspective is correct and I doubt if this was really your intention. I think it is a brilliant photo because I keep on looking to it --Michielverbeek 12:13, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Indeed a wonderful panorama and nice motif. I appreciate the big work in such a pano, however, there are at least 7 stitching errors left and they should be corrected. Also, the grey-out of the plate numbers is far too sloppy - this image deserves a decent blanking out. --Cccefalon 16:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose very nice, but per Cccefalon. Fixable! --Carschten 12:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:46, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Laos, plantations sur le Plateau des Bolovens, (4).jpg[edit]

 Comment Thank you for your advice. ✓ Done more sharpness, and add a better identification (it's a flower on a Banana tree) --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:12, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but the focus should have been on the flower. I don't think it can be fixed. --A.Savin 12:35, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

* I withdraw my nomination Thank you for your advices.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:57, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Фрагмент керамического иконостаса 3.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Fragment of a ceramic iconostasis of the temple of the Tolgsky icon of the Mother of God of the Vysoko-Petrovsky monastery of Moscow. Фрагмент керамического иконостаса храма Толгской иконы Божией Матери Высоко-Петровского монастыря г.Москвы -- WM wm WM 17:46, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:09, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is blurred resp. unfocused. Also, no QI seal without proper category(-ies). --A.Savin 13:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not categorized.--Jebulon 22:10, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose not focused and lack of category. -- DerFussi 12:57, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

File:ICE_Velaro_D_Köln_Hauptbahnhof_2015-12-17-01.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination DBAG Class 407 in the near of Cologne main station. --Rolf H. 07:19, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:43, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Difficult scene, but, IMHO, too much overexposure (sky, top of the train). Please discuss. --C messier 12:42, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per C messier.--Jebulon 22:07, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overexposed, clipping in relevant areas. -- Smial 11:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
  • weak  Support -- I could live with the sky. -- DerFussi 12:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

File:MercedesBenzW15MDP.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Audi A6 parked in Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 23:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:02, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment That's definitely not an A6 and not even an Audi, but a Mercedes-Benz W 176 --Tsungam 07:42, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
    Why did you name it W15? Is that the model in Argentina? And it is still incorrect categorized. --Tsungam 07:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Besides it's not really sharp. --Tsungam 08:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
    Fixed Ezarate 16:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:32, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose irreparably blurry (camera shaking while taking the photo), tilted. --Carschten 06:11, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as for carschten. -- Smial 10:43, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as Carschten. -- DerFussi 12:53, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:50, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

File:CaboCorrientesMDP4-ene2016.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination View of the viewer of Cape Corrientes, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 23:08, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment the building is leaning. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:19, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Maathavan 10:24, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
    {{oppose}}
    •  Comment Please the person who objects has not signed its opinion.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:44, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I don't think it's QI. The building is too leaning.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose sorry, but for a photo under this conditions (outside, sunny), it's too noisy IMHO. I don't really understand what's the reason for that at ISO 100... --Carschten 06:14, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Opposenot sharp enough to be a Q1 under this weather circumstances --Michielverbeek 06:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Leaning is minimal and no reason do decline but the quality is too bad (noisy, unsharpness) -- DerFussi 12:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:51, 25 January 2016 (UTC)