Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 23 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Cathedral_Fribourg_vitrail_Dreikönig_04.jpg[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Ermell 09:22, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cathedral_Fribourg_vitrail_Dreikönig_02.jpg[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Ermell 09:20, 21 February 2022 (UTC))[reply]

File:F0764_Paris_II_place_de_la_Bourse_rwk.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Paris 2 place de la Bourse (by Mbzt) --Sebring12Hrs 19:04, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • I think that the photo can be improved by applying lens and perspective correction, otherwise looks good. --VileGecko 21:14, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't see a basis for moving this nomination that has no votes to Consensual Review, which is what a status of "Discuss" does. Let your discussion with the nominator play out here. Maybe Mbzt will make the edits you're requesting. If not, feel free to decline in a few days if that's what you'd like to do. -- Ikan Kekek 02:03, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not done since a week. --Steindy 19:13, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality to me, though I don't understand why one woman's face is so blurred. I guess she demanded that? I think she's probably still recognizable. But anyway... -- Ikan Kekek 03:49, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose For a QI, a too distracting foreground. --Palauenc05 13:09, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Colour channel clipping in the sky. --Smial 18:44, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC)