Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 22 2022
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Daniel-Edward Daniliuc, goalkeeper of Floridsdorfer AC --Steindy 00:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:13, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The SC Wiener Neustadt players celebrate the winning goal. --Steindy 00:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:13, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination After the train accident in Ebenhausen from Feb 14, 2022 - the doors of one of the wrecked trains being secured on a low loader --Kritzolina 18:41, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:10, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination After the train accident in Ebenhausen from Feb 14, 2022 - insulators of the disconnected overhead power lines --Kritzolina 18:41, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:10, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination After the train accident in Ebenhausen from Feb 14, 2022 - warning sign on the site of the damaged tracks --Kritzolina 18:41, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:45, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coat of arms (1767) in Trier. --Palauenc05 17:48, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:24, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mascaron for Fountains. Santiago. Chile --Rjcastillo 17:45, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:41, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The inflorescence of a fragrant orchid (Gymnadenia conopsea) in the nature reserve Südlicher Bliesgau/Auf der Lohe. --DavidJRasp 10:17, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:23, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A silver-washed fritillary (Argynnis paphia) on a flower in the nature reserve Südlicher Bliesgau/Auf der Lohe. --DavidJRasp 10:17, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:46, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The building at the Bahnhofstraße 49 in Püttlingen. --DavidJRasp 10:17, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:50, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Damage to The O2 Arena's tent caused by Storm Eunice --~~~~
- Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grey heron in Hyde Park in London --Ermell 10:07, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality! --DavidJRasp 10:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC) --DavidJRasp 10:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the harbour from the Millennium Cross in Gdańsk --Ermell 10:07, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality! --DavidJRasp 10:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC) --DavidJRasp 10:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the St Joseph church in Kranj, Upper Carniola, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 07:42, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:37, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Joseph church in Kranj, Upper Carniola, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 07:42, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:37, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Soča river near Kamno, Kobarid municipality, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 07:42, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:37, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Soča river in the Municipality of Kobarid, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 07:42, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:38, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Julian Alps seen from Vršič Pass, Upper Carniola, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 07:42, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:38, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Évora / Alentejo, Portugal - Igreja de São Francisco - Monastery --Imehling 07:25, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:44, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Évora / Alentejo, Portugal - Cathedra --Imehling 07:25, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:44, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Évora / Alentejo, Portugal - Cathedral - End of Roof --Imehling 07:25, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:42, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Évora / Alentejo, Portugal - Cathedral - Embellishment on Roof --Imehling 07:25, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:44, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Experiment with lens ball and light stick --XRay 06:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:30, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lintel of the Bauhaus Gate of Vischering Castle, Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:30, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination King amidst the other chess pieces --XRay 06:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:30, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kampen, Sculpture "Work" Artwork by Irma Horstman in Park De la Soblonièrekade.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 19 February 2022 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Kampen, Sculpture "Work" Artwork by Irma Horstman in Park De la Soblonièrekade.
-
- Nomination Romanesque windows at the parish church Saints Florian and Josef in Tanzenberg, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:33, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Access balcony's balustrade and barred window at the parish church Saints Florian and Josef in Tanzenberg, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:33, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Balustrade at the staircase to the parish church Saints Florian and Josef in Tanzenberg, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:33, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:44, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Apse of the parish church Saints Florian and Josef in Tanzenberg, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:33, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Façade Sud Palais Justice - Paris I (FR75) - 2022-01-15 (by Chabe01) --Sebring12Hrs 20:36, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support It seems too much denoising, but good enough IMO. --Tournasol7 07:46, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pokrovo-Prigorodnoe village in Russia. --Alexander Novikov 18:30, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
The spot in the sky is disturbing. --Ermell 21:24, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Done New version uploaded. Alexander Novikov 19:42, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:46, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination landscape of the Hegau by Suedkollektiv --Milseburg 17:25, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion I looked at a few screens on the left, and it looks beautiful, but there are lots of dust spots that need to be removed. -- Ikan Kekek 17:58, 18 February 2022 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: Oh yes, you're right. Thanks for the hint. I tried to eliminate them even though I don't have the original footage. The uloader isn't active anymore, I'm afraid. --Milseburg 21:57, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Support Great job! I still see some really small ones among the clouds on the 2nd-rightmost screen, but they're hard to see even on my 23.5-inch screen. -- Ikan Kekek 03:46, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Adamant1 05:12, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1854 prestamp cover Clare to Adelaide showing the rate of 2 pence (by MtGambierPhil) --Adamant1 07:52, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. EXIF data is missing. --Tagooty 01:32, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sächsische Volksbräuche auf Briefmarken. --Nightflyer 21:27, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:54, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Adamant1 05:13, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ahmed and Mohammed Hussain Performing at Madhya Pradesh Tribal Museum November 2015I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 18:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Eyes not sharp enough. Sorry. --Ermell 14:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cromeleque dos Almendres / Portugal, Alentejo - Engraved stone --Imehling 08:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Isn't it the same as the one proposed on the 14th? --Velvet 08:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination You are right. Thank you. --Imehling 09:53, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (16)--Maksimsokolov 02:28, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
The verticals should be corrected. --Ermell 08:54, 15 February 2022 (UTC))
I withdraw my nomination Thank you for the feedback!--Maksimsokolov 14:21, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (7)--Maksimsokolov 00:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (8)--Maksimsokolov 00:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (9)--Maksimsokolov 00:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Volkswagen press conference at the Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 15:00, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: No green pass graffiti in Venice, Italy. --Mænsard vokser 12:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 14:57, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
I did upload a new version of the file.--Mænsard vokser 15:23, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
File:SC_Wiener_Neustadt_vs._Floridsdorfer_AC_2018-05-04_(057).jpg[edit]
- Nomination Daniel Rechberger, player of Floridsdorfer AC. --Steindy 00:05, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:26, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Insufficient detail. Cropped hand. --Tagooty 01:36, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Yeah, the cropped hand is distracting in this instance. -- Ikan Kekek 18:47, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ikan.--Peulle 08:27, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Peulle 08:27, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Peking_Great_Wall-20071019-RM-115941.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Section of the Great Wall at Badaling --Ermell 08:25, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support good quality. --Palauenc05 09:55, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, this picture is tilted to the left. --Imehling 15:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 08:26, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Frontenac_Hotel,_Quebec_ville,_downtown_006.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Frontenac Hotel --Wilfredor 20:12, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Adamant1 07:44, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Not sharp enough, some objects are clearly out of focus. --VileGecko 19:04, 16 February 2022 (UTC) - Oppose Tilted IMO--Lmbuga 12:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Peulle 08:24, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
File:No_al_controllo_sociale_-_graffito_su_telo_di_plastica_nel_centro_di_Milano,_Lombardia,_Italia_-_2021-10-24.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Stancil graffiti in Milano, Italy. --Mænsard vokser 15:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Regretfully I disagree. Not sharp enough for a flat surface image and too many JPEG artifacts. --GRDN711 22:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC) - Support I don't see any JPEG-artifacts, just the weave pattern of the plastik. --Granada 12:10, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support per Granada and Ermell. -- Ikan Kekek 03:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 08:24, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Repeater_antenna_on_Monte_Secco_Brembano_-_Piazzatorre,_Bergamo,_Lombardy,_Italy_-_2022-01-29.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Repeater antenna on Mount Secco Brembano, Italy. --Mænsard vokser 17:39, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Not sharp enough. --VileGecko 20:25, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support seems ok. --Tomer T 13:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp enough. --Steindy 12:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support per Tomer T --Ermell 21:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support per others. --Imehling 11:26, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 08:23, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Πλατεία_Αμερικής_9858.jpg[edit]
- Nomination View of Amerikis square, Athens. --C messier 11:29, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:38, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
OpposeCA should be fixed. --Tomer T 11:54, 14 February 2022 (UTC)- Oppose Yes, it should. And am I seeing things or is this tilted?--Peulle 08:34, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Done --C messier 17:39, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support per fixes. Tomer T 08:15, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Seems good enough. -- Ikan Kekek 00:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support OK now. --A.Savin 15:33, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 08:23, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Florence_-_Campanile.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Florence - Campanile of Cathedral --Imehling 14:38, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Bad focus --VileGecko 21:14, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
I don't see what is bad about the focus of this picture. --Imehling 06:58, 10 February 2022 (UTC) - Support Good enough for QI. --Steindy 13:21, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Cropped people in the front --Michielverbeek 08:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Most of the tower is in good focus, people are part of this urban scene. Given the height of the tower, the slight softness near the top and cropping of 2-3 people are minor IMO. --Tagooty 14:37, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment This tower looks straight at the top, or at least correctly corrected vertically. But at the bottom it looks crooked. Since this is an old masonry, I can't judge whether it might actually be built somehow crooked in reality, or whether something went wrong during the photographing or the perspective correction. Sometimes I wish I had an image version for comparison that had not suffered any subsequent corrections. --Smial 14:48, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose agree with VileGecko. Tomer T 16:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. The top is unsharp due to upsampling from the perspective correction. Stretching the pixels in one part of the image is unavoidable unless you severely downsample the rest of the image. --King of Hearts 00:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support From experience I know that it is not easy to make it all fit into a frame so, given the distance from which you had to frame it, excellent photo. You have been really good. . PROPOLI87 16:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 16:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality for me. --Sebring12Hrs 20:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality for me.--Lmbuga 12:55, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 08:23, 21 February 2022 (UTC)