Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 14 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Austria_national_under-21_football_team_-_Teamcamp_June_2017_(140).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination PUMA-football. --Steindy 00:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose For a static shot, too much blown highlights on the top half. --Tagooty 06:31, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sharpness is basically okay, depth of field acceptable. But for a shot of this kind, I expect more than just 4 MPixels and balanced lighting without burnt-out highlights. Moreover, the cropping is completely inadequate both in terms of messy edges, the missing piece at the bottom edge and the chosen background. For such a design JPG is the wrong format, it should be a PNG with transparent background. --Smial 12:23, 9 February 2022 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
  •  Oppose Per Tagooty and Smial for burnt-out highlights. --Sebring12Hrs 15:57, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Steindy 13:54, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Castle_of_Montgey_(1).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Castle of Montgey, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 06:10, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:15, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Procedural  Oppose -- discussion on whether it is in accordance with our rules to nominate 10 own photos per day is pending. --A.Savin 00:24, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment It is so ridiculous... --Sebring12Hrs 06:50, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Checking nominations by using the rules is not ridiculous but necessary. --Augustgeyler 15:05, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Skewed perspective, low sharpness, part of building is obscured by cables. --VileGecko 09:29, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Steindy 13:58, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

File:St_John_the_Baptist_church_in_Cambounet_(5).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Saint John the Baptist church in Cambounet-sur-le-Sor, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 06:10, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality --Llez 07:07, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Procedural  Oppose -- discussion on whether it is in accordance with our rules to nominate 10 own photos per day is pending. --A.Savin 00:24, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Church tower partly obscured by the tree, bad focus. --VileGecko 09:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Steindy 14:00, 13 February 2022 (UTC)