Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 12 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:มศว_องครักษ์_ภาพถ่าย_03.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Srinakharinwirot University, Ongkharak (resubmitted due to archival with inactivity) --Chainwit. 06:41, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality, eventually top and bottom crop --Michielverbeek 07:43, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think we should discuss this one. The detail level seems low, especially on the left.--Peulle 07:44, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Noise reduction killed detail. --Smial 11:46, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose + 1 I mean, look at the four trees in the centre and the left sight of the right building seems tiled and uneven. --Der Angemeldete 12:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:05, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

File:มศว_องครักษ์_ภาพถ่าย_02.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Srinakharinwirot University, Ongkharak (resubmitted due to archival with inactivity) --Chainwit. 06:41, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Low detail. Needs perspective correction.--Peulle 12:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Noise reduction killed detail. --Smial 11:47, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Same here. --Der Angemeldete 12:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:31, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Goose_in_Hever_(DSCF0842).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Goose (likely "Oie bavaroise") in Hever (Leuven, Belgium), along the F8 bicycle path --Trougnouf 12:16, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:48, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose Can you fix the CA around the eyes and the neck? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:37, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done --Trougnouf 15:32, 5 February 2023 (UTC) Comment Good job removing the CA but I'm confused if the process made that part bit blur. So, I'm gonna be neutral.--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 21:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Now OK for me. --Rjcastillo 01:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support No CA visible by far, hail to the mighty goose.--Der Angemeldete 13:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:32, 11 February 2023 (UTC)