Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 11 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Un bloc de surveillance de baignade à Miami Beach en février 2022.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Un bloc de surveillance de baignade à Mimai Beach en février 2022. --Benoît Prieur 20:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --~~~~
  •  Oppose Strong tilt, see horizon. --Milseburg 20:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Milseburg.--Peulle 07:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Hot-air_balloon_-_07.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Karl Marx Street in the city of Tambov, Russia. --Alexander Novikov 11:13, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality and helpfl annotation. --DavidJRasp 15:49, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, but the perspective correction is needed. --Tournasol7 05:27, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Correcting the perspective in this case would contribute little to a more natural representation, but would cut off essential parts of the picture. I think that in an aerial photograph it should be decided on a case-by-case basis whether buildings have to be forcibly verticalised or whether the natural perspective would not be the better choice. --Smial 12:54, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Wrong perspective. --Steindy 23:00, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 07:37, 10 February 2022 (UTC)