Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 04 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:2013 09 18 002 Fenster mit Blumenkasten.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Window with flower box --F. Riedelio 13:15, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:58, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please rename your file from "unbenannt" to a meaningful name and please add the location of the window. --XRay 16:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
    Weak  Support now. Location still missing. Please add the name of the town or village. --XRay 10:47, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
  • {{o}} until renaming --Hubertl 07:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Location added, file renamed. --F. Riedelio 15:09, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Schönes Bild -- Spurzem 18:18, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 18:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

File:2015 10 11 004 Weathered window shutter.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Weathered window with folding shutters, closed. --F. Riedelio 13:15, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Neutral Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:37, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please rename your file from "unbenannt" to a meaningful name and please add the location of the window. --XRay 16:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support Location still missing. Please add the name of the town or village. --XRay 10:48, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
  • {{o}} until renaming --Hubertl 07:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
  • changed my vote to neutral until renaming. --Cccefalon 07:59, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 08:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Location added, file renamed. --F. Riedelio 14:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 23:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good for me -- Spurzem 18:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 18:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Wülfershausen-3706.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hohes Kreuz, dated 1721, Wülfershausen an der Saale, Germany --DKrieger 22:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  OpposeNeeds to be centred better--Ermell 09:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment I see no reason to center it and would be grateful for more opinions --DKrieger 11:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment please rename, this is not Wulfershausen, its a wayside cross in Wulfershausen. --Hubertl 07:28, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Somewhat hard lighting, but acceptable. @Hubertl: Die Bildbeschreibung ist doch korrekt, oder nicht? "Ortsname - Bildnummer" als Datename ist nicht gerade perfekt, aber sicherlich nicht "totally meaningless". @DKrieger: Du könntest, um dein Dateibenamsungsschema nicht durcheinanderzubringen, z.B. hintendran einen Klammerzusatz anhängen, also etwas wie "Ortsname-Nummer (Objekt,Straßenname,Kurzbezeichnung)" basteln, dann bliebe deine lokale Sortierung erhalten und du hättest trotzdem eine genauere Spezifizierung. --Smial 10:47, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Crop at right of the pedestal is unfortunate. Hubertl is right about the name, in my opinion. This is not "meaningless", but this is "useless". Nur Faultier ?--Jebulon 10:51, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 18:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Golub-Dobrzyń, dawny kościół ewangelicki 4.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Former evangelic church in Golub, Golub-Dobrzyń, Poland --1bumer 18:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality: left half of the image out of focus, no English description. --F. Riedelio 08:18, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good all over sharpness, english description is not mandatory (but it is welcomed). --C messier 10:03, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

* {{o}} No English (or other language: French, German, Spanish...) description. Improvable. --Lmbuga 22:05, 30 January 2016 (UTC) I added the English text--Lmbuga 22:19, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

  •  Support sufficient quality --MB-one 20:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 18:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)