Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 07 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Beitar_Jerusalem_FC_vs._MTK_Budapest_FC_2016-06-18_(027).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Kobi Moyal. By User:Steindy --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Eyes are too soft --Cvmontuy 13:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Face not sharp enough, as with the other one below. -- Ikan Kekek 09:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 Comment @Ikan Kekek: Any comparison with other photos is wrong, as they are not studio photos and the conditions in the wild and the technique in each photo are different. In any case, this late afternoon was alternately rainy and cloudy skies. At that time I did not have the high-resolution Canon 2.8 / 300 lens, but only the normal Canon 3.5-5.6 / 18-200 lens. I was therefore glad to be able to take at least halfway usable photos. In addition, I do not have Adobe Photoshop to improve my photos. Regards --Steindy (talk) 12:57, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
  • I'm comparing the results, not the conditions. Best, Ikan Kekek 13:37, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
  • I did not say that I find the photo worthy of a mark and I have given myself a decline. It was just an answer to your comparison with other photos. OK? --Steindy 20:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Yes, of course. I wasn't objecting. -- Ikan Kekek 01:27, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Ralf, I figure you supported; Cvmontuy, I figure you opposed. If not, change your votes accordingly. -- Ikan Kekek 12:13, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment - Andrew, I don't know how the nomination line, including your signature, got deleted. I tried to reconstruct it, but the time is definitely wrong. Feel free to edit. -- Ikan Kekek 12:19, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose +1! --Steindy 12:38, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Steindy 23:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Beitar_Jerusalem_FC_vs._MTK_Budapest_FC_2016-06-18_(019).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Itay Shechter. By User:Steindy --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:56, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree image is too soft --Cvmontuy 21:20, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Cvmontuy. Face is not sharp enough and also noisy, as one can especially see on his teeth. -- Ikan Kekek 05:37, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose +1.--Peulle 07:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose +1! --Steindy 17:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Морозний_ранок_у_горах.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Carpathian Biosphere Reserve. By User:Misha Reme --Tomer T 21:14, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Pretty but unfortunately with dust or dirt spots. --Steindy 21:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 21:57, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Not with the spots. --Steindy 23:50, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too soft in any case.--Peulle 10:52, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment - In this case, I'm missing the dust spots. Where are you seeing some? As for the overall quality, there's a short DoF, but it's lovely, it's a really large file, and the lodges or whatever are sharp enough, so I'm inclined to support but will await the correction of the dust spots, if you guys can fill me in on where to look for them. -- Ikan Kekek 11:27, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Somewhat soft, but in consideration of the high resolution the photo is just good enough. The "dirt" or "spots" are very small and not disturbing and could even be some unsharp structure in the background as lots of those can be seen on the right half of the image. Imho insignificant. --Smial 13:56, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice picture, good enough imo. -- Alvesgaspar 21:06, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - I still can't see any dust spots. Support per my remarks above and others. -- Ikan Kekek 05:49, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 02:18, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Absberg_Kellergasse_48.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse in Absberg (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 06:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Patterns at the door. Sorry. --Ermell 07:48, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. It's not the photo, that is wrong, it is the software. I think it could be repaired. --Steindy 10:16, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Patterns on the door shadow, sorry --PantheraLeo1359531 13:34, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Steindy 23:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)