Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 23 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:2021-02-06_IBSF_World_Championships_Bobsleigh_and_Skeleton_Altenberg_1DX_1534_by_Stepro.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination IBSF World Championships Bobsleigh and Skeleton Altenberg: Lolo Jones (USA); gold medal; celebration. --Stepro 04:03, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Disturbing element in the foreground, not a QI to me, sorry --Poco a poco 05:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)<
    The element is the screen on which she is looking and has seen that she is the winner. So it's an essential part of the picture for me. --Stepro 07:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As we cannot actually see what the object in question is, it remains a disturbance for me.--Peulle 08:44, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 09:39, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too disturbing. --Steindy 00:33, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Hamburg_Billstedt_Manshardtstraße_200_012_2021_06_25.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Children's burial grounds and memorial for unborn life in the Öjendorf cemetery (Hamburg-Billstedt)
    --F. Riedelio 07:15, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose IMHO not sharp enough / too low DoF, especially considering the relatively low resolution. --Domob 10:50, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
     Comment Thanks for the review but I disagree: IMO the resolution (3.226 × 1.859 Pixel) is high enough and the subject (tombstones) is in focus. --F. Riedelio 07:15, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Seems good enough in quality to me, but is this a full-size image? If it isn't, please upload the full size. -- Ikan Kekek 09:43, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
  • ✓ New version Thanks for the hint. Upload new version with full size. --F. Riedelio 15:08, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks. So at full size, the quality is marginal and not good enough for me to vote for it. You are not supposed to submit downsampled versions of photos in order to make them look better. -- Ikan Kekek 23:54, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:40, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

File:2021_year._Russia,_Elektrostal._Street_Sportivnaya._img-159.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Clouds and blue sky in Russia, Elektrostal. --Knopik-som 02:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose The area where sky meets cloud is unnaturally burnt. --Tiouraren 11:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose The unusual darkness where the sky meets the clouds isn't ideal --SHB2000 08:22, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Which is not ideal. brightness, noise ... I will make a new version of the file --Knopik-som 04:43, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
  • a new version of the file has been uploaded --Knopik-som 05:12, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support New version looks ok.--Smial 09:24, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks good, now. --Zinnmann 18:37, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Useless image. Yeah, I still have this naive-idealist view of what Commons is for: providing freely licensed media for educational purpose. This is surely not done by photographing & uploading every trash bin in your home town... --A.Savin 09:05, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Useless, there are also noise and green areas. --Sebring12Hrs 10:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support It is not up for discussion on QIC whether an image is useful or not. Please focus on judging the image quality. We cannot foresee how an image might be considered useful in the future. Maybe some people just want a copyleft image of a cloud in their speech presentations or flyers? Who's to say? --Peulle 11:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
    It is not about whether we wish clouds' pictures or not, but about this Elektrostal spam that is definitely unwelcome. By supporting the image you are encouraging this spam. By the way, Category:Clouds and blue sky in Russia already contains 1,200 entries, not to mention all other countries' categories on the same topic. --A.Savin 18:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
  • I take your point, but the guidelines specifies that there is no limit on the number of similar QIs. If people feel that they don't want to promote an image because it is too similar to others, I suggest they simply leave it alone and don't review it.--Peulle 06:50, 18 August 2021 (UTC).
  •  Support OK, two tiny specks of something. I'm not sure I see the problem in there being lots of photos of clouds. -- Ikan Kekek 09:45, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality, --Steindy 00:30, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per A.Savin. --Kallerna 14:55, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:40, 22 August 2021 (UTC)