Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 28 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Château-Roussillon tower(2).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Tower of Château-Roussillon (13th ctry.), Perpignan, France. --Palauenc05 20:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Overprocessed - noise and pixelation in the sky. --A.Savin 00:41, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks for reviewing. New version uploaded, please check again. --Palauenc05 08:11, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Well, apparently you have now only softened the picture. This way it's not QI for me --A.Savin 10:25, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment No, I haven't. But I'd like other opinions, please. --Palauenc05 11:23, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment - A.Savin, please explain what you mean by "softened". If I look closely at full size, I can see a bit of pixellation in the sky (Palauenc05, can you fix that?), but the tower itself looks good enough to me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:44, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment It looks to me very much like applying a soft filter against noise, which results in less sharp detail (including detail on the tower) than previous version. A new process might help. --A.Savin 09:32, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment OK, one final attempt uploaded. Please look again. --Palauenc05 14:54, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
To be honest, I failed to see any notable improvement. Did you consider doing a new attempt to process from the raw data? --A.Savin 17:12, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Seems good enough for QI to me. The tower looks like it's leaning back slightly, but it did in all 3 versions, and I think that's just (or mainly) because of the plants at the bottom. -- Ikan Kekek 00:19, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)