Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 26 2020
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Dairy farm Aldewei Boornzwaag municipality De Fryske Marren province Friesland.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Dairy farm Aldewei Boornzwaag municipality De Fryske Marren province Friesland.
-
- Nomination Walk across the Hulshorsterzand/Hulshorsterheide. View over Hulshorsterzand/Hulshorsterheide.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Walk across the Hulshorsterzand/Hulshorsterheide. View over Hulshorsterzand/Hulshorsterheide.
-
-
-
- Nomination Sculpture “Silberne Frequenz” (Otto Piene, 1970/71, 2012/14 redesign) at the LWL museum, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:50, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Game reserve in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:50, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Episcopal palace/general vicariate and Überwasser church in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:50, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Cleome rutidosperma --Vengolis 03:31, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Park trees at villa Wörth on Johannaweg #5, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality, but please have a look. It's leaning in. --XRay 03:52, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Done @XRay: Thanks, Dietmar. Rectified. —- Johann Jaritz 04:38, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa Christina on Johannaweg #7, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:34, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Promenade on Johannaweg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:34, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Promenadenbad on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade #24, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:34, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flower-bed on the vernal Johannes-Brahms-Promenade in front of the Parkhotel, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:34, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Constantine column in Trier, Germany. --Palauenc05 17:34, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 17:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Vertol Model 107 helicopter manufactured by Kawasaki Kawasaki Heavy Industries. By User:Ka23 13 --Tomer T 15:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:39, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail with relief of Saint Teresa of Ávila. --Moroder 14:45, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:39, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of altar dedicated to the Rosary Madonna in the parish church of Urtijëi. --Moroder 14:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:39, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Armenian lahmacun (lérmédjoun). --Benoît Prieur 10:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose - I love lahmacun, but none of it is sharp in this photo (also, you should remove Category:Armenian lahmacun, which is presumably a parent category of Category:Armenian lahmacun cooking). -- Ikan Kekek 12:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bridge of Afonso Cerqueira Corvette, Madeira, Portugal --Poco a poco 10:09, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:31, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bridge of Afonso Cerqueira Corvette, Madeira, Portugal --Poco a poco 10:09, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tomer T 20:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Besiktas ferry quay in Istanbul --MB-one 08:32, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Ok --Poco a poco 10:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Schloßberg 2 in Gotha, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 08:16, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Sadly, I know from personal experience, how difficult that building is to photograph. But there's just too much obstructing the view from that angle. --MB-one 08:32, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at 22 Place du Bourg in Rodez, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 08:16, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination World War Memorial in Krefeld-Hülser Berg --Carschten 07:43, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:17, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Heusgen Villa in Krefeld --Carschten 07:43, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Heusgen Villa in Krefeld --Carschten 07:43, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:17, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Information board at the Heusgen Villa in Krefeld --Carschten 07:43, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sirmione (Italy) --GattoCeliaco 06:18, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose - Rather small and with the nasty distortion that's common in cellphone photos. Cellphone photos have passed QIC, but the question you can ask yourself before you nominate one is "Does this look like a cellphone photo?" If the answer is "Yes", it won't pass. The ones that pass are so good we're surprised when we check the Exif information and see it was photographed using a cellphone. -- Ikan Kekek 08:41, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination The Ebelsbach near Schönbach in the nature park Haßberge --Ermell 05:48, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Meadow at Ebelsbach near Schönbach in the nature park Haßberge --Ermell 05:48, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Please have a look to the CAs at the branches at the left. --XRay 06:49, 23 April 2020 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review.--Ermell 12:35, 23 April 2020 (UTC) Support Thank you. --XRay 14:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fammensrakken from the Aldewei Boornzwaag municipality De Fryske Marren province Friesland.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Please fix the dustspot --Uoaei1 04:57, 23 April 2020 (UTC) Done. Removed spots. Thank you for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:15, 23 April 2020 (UTC) Support --Uoaei1 19:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Fammensrakken from the Aldewei Boornzwaag municipality De Fryske Marren province Friesland.
-
-
-
- Nomination Panorama from Pserimos, Greece. --Kallerna 12:20, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn The white ship and the white houses in the background on the left are too bright and the cut at the bottom is too tight. -- Spurzem 14:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
I agree. --Kallerna 08:03, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Motueka war memorial, Motueka --Podzemnik 03:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Are you sure about perspective correction? --XRay 04:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
I hope it's better now --Podzemnik 22:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC) Support IMO it's better now and acceptable. --XRay 06:51, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trabajador de una empresa privada realiza la sanitización de los transportes recolectores de basura en la Alcaldía Cuauhtémoc de la Ciudad de México.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:EneasMx --ProtoplasmaKid 18:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:15, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tras las rejas en su propia casa, una mujer con cubrebocas se asoma por la ventana de su departamento en Tlatelolco.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:EneasMx --ProtoplasmaKid 18:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Messy composition --MB-one 13:15, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Church of Our Lady, Trondheim, Norway --Poco a poco 09:43, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:16, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bicycle lift, Trondheim, Norway --Poco a poco 09:43, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose The focus pane is slightly behind the cyclist. Bummer --MB-one 13:16, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination 'Pink Emily' Rose, Bad Wörishofen, Germany --Poco a poco 11:42, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:12, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Fireboat in lake Constance --janbery 15:40, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Review
Looks tilted (see the building on the right), the sky is posterized especially on the top left. Also, please add geo tag and English description --Podzemnik 02:17, 18 April 2020 (UTC) Done straightened --janbery 12:30, 18 April 2020
-
-
- Nomination: Right front fender of the Bentley Continental GT, IAA 2017 --MB-one 12:37, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Wikimedians posing at the Luther monument during the traditional city tour after Wikimedia Summit 2019 --MB-one 12:37, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Entrance to the Port of Friedrichshafen --MB-one 12:18, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mercedes-AMG C 43 at Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 12:18, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Road sign "Path to the labyrinthe". --PantheraLeo1359531 10:19, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:10, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Gravdal, Lofoten, Norway --Poco a poco 11:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Building at Mainzer Gasse 20 in Alsfeld, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:05, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Please, remove thaz huge spot in the sky --Poco a poco 09:54, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Done. --Tournasol7 20:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
_01.jpg)
_45.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_01.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
Consensual review[edit]
File:Pioda_di_Crana_and_Pizzo_del_Corno_-_winter_view_from_La_Piana_di_Vigezzo_-_Craveggia_VCO,_Piedmont_Italy_-_2018-12-31.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Mountain Pioda di Crana in Italy. --Mænsard vokser 08:21, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:49, 22 April 2020 (UTC) Oppose The bottom part is IMO too soft. Perhaps caused by f/4.9 --Podzemnik 19:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Podzemnik. -- Ikan Kekek 08:46, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → 
Declined ----Seven Pandas 11:43, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Declined ----Seven Pandas 11:43, 25 April 2020 (UTC)File:Sihlwald_Tannboden_20200416.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Spring in Sihlwald near Tannboden --Domob 17:31, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:59, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Both under- and overexposed, tough light conditions. Kallerna 05:08, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support - I think Kallerna is right, but I also think declining this photo on that basis is excessively strict for QIC, as the exposure issues are mild. I find the compromise acceptable and I love the feeling of peace I get from the photo. Getting across that feeling is part of a photo's quality, too, although we focus on it more at FPC. -- Ikan Kekek 08:54, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support The overexposed parts are rather small and not disturbing. I can't find really underexposed parts, the image looks imho natural. At best, the color saturation could be considered a little too high, but that would only be a matter of taste. --Smial 13:05, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Spurzem 14:01, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → 
Promoted ----Seven Pandas 11:41, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Promoted ----Seven Pandas 11:41, 25 April 2020 (UTC)File:Road_in_Mongolia_aimak_Bayan_Ulgiy_01.jpg[edit]
- Nomination The road in Mongolia aimak Bayan Ulgiy. North-Western Mongolia near the border with Russia --Alexandr frolov 05:38, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality --Domob 17:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Overexposed. Lacks details in overexposed places. Bit noisy. Please discuss --Joydeep 08:08, 22 April 2020 (UTC) - Support - A bit grainy but a knockout view. To me, that equals a QI. If it weren't grainy, we might be considering an FP nomination. -- Ikan Kekek 08:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- It's undercategorized but definitely a good image. Prelimininary Oppose. --MB-one 14:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support looks good to me. Tomer T 20:54, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted ----Seven Pandas 11:40, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Promoted ----Seven Pandas 11:40, 25 April 2020 (UTC)File:Three_people_posing_in_front_of_the_Brussels_City_Museum_while_Grand_Place_is_unusually_empty_because_of_the_COVID-19_pandemic_(DSCF7223).jpg[edit]
.jpg){kind=spacer}
- Nomination Three people posing in front of the Brussels City Museum while Grand Place is unusually empty because of the COVID-19 pandemic --Trougnouf 20:52, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose I think the crop is too tight, we're getting too much of the ground and the light is not favorable --Podzemnik 06:07, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Comment I disagree. The building is not cropped; both side streets are visible and there is plenty of space on the top and bottom. The prominent ground space highlights the unusual emptiness of Grand Place, and I don't think a typical cloudy day during golden hour is defavorable enough to disqualify from a QI. --Trougnouf 18:07, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Category:Breadhouse (Brussels) and en:Grand_Place#Buildings_around_the_square beg to differ. I think the building is too big to fit in landscape in 18mm as far back as I can get. And I don't think adding cropped buildings on the sides would be much of an improvement. --Trougnouf 07:45, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Indeed from the corner at Café de Bruxelles a landscape is probably too big for 18mm but I did not realize the limits of your camera. I prefer the photo at Category:Breadhouse (Brussels) and I also change my opinion to
Neutral --Michielverbeek 19:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Podzemnik. --Kallerna 06:23, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Absolute Ok for QI in my eyes. First I thought light could be better for a portrait of the building. On the other hand the grey light fits the current situation. Also the empty space in front of the building. --Milseburg 07:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support per Milseburg. I don't see any problem whatsoever. -- Ikan Kekek 10:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support per Milseburg. --MB-one 14:30, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Seven Pandas 11:38, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Promoted --Seven Pandas 11:38, 25 April 2020 (UTC)File:Angkor_Wat,_Camboya,_2013-08-16,_DD_074.JPG[edit]
- Nomination: Angkor Wat, Cambodia --Poco a poco 10:22, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- Review
- Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Lack of detail. --Kallerna 05:22, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - Haze is fine, but this is a little noisy. Could you decrease the noise? -- Ikan Kekek 04:03, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek: Done Poco a poco 10:23, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek:
- Comment - Very subtle difference. -- Ikan Kekek 10:40, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek: and now? --Poco a poco 11:59, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - What I'm seeing is that the noise reduction is at the expense of decreasing details. So what I ultimately think is that it's better to revert to the version as of 16:33, 12 April 2020. I'm kind of undecided about whether it's a QI or not, though, so I'm really unsure I'll vote. Sorry to put you through this - I had to see the versions, compare them and reflect to come to this point. -- Ikan Kekek 00:17, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment No problem, Done Poco a poco 08:09, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support - I've decided to support. The noise is really mostly a feeling of haze, and declining over it seems too nitpicky to me, considering the overall atmosphere and IMO general quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:57, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose too dark, lack of detail, unsharp. Seven Pandas 23:22, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Seven Pandas --GRDN711 01:08, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support It's an atmospheric shot. We don't complain about the lack of detail in silhouettes, and even though this is not quite a silhouette the effect is similar. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:41, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → 
Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Peulle 10:55, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Peulle 10:55, 25 April 2020 (UTC)