Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 24 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:AOK Recklinghausen.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hospital in Recklinghausen, Germany --Nordenfan 10:40, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Overall good, but there are some stitching-problems to be solved. See notes.--Milseburg 18:14, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Stiching-Fehler wurden behoben. problems fixed --Nordenfan 09:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment Deutlich besser. Ein kleines Stich-Problem habe ich noch makiert. Auch über der Stelle ist das Mauerwerk nicht ganz so sauber zusammengefügt wie sonst und die Äste darüber sind verschwommener. Vielleicht kannst du die ganze Naht noch einmal ckecken. --Milseburg 12:28, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
        • ✓ Done Habe das Stiching-Problem behoben und den Rest, soweit ich es konnte, verbessert. Hoffe, dass es so besser ist --Nordenfan 16:21, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
  • {{s}} OK for QI, I think. --Milseburg 23:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry. IMO CAs at the trees and too many stitching errors. (Please see my notes.) --XRay 15:45, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, I have to withdraw my vote. XRay is right. There are stitching errors left. --Milseburg (talk) 11:41, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  I withdraw my nomination --Nordenfan (talk) 19:01, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 06:23, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Hummingbird_in_Cotopaxi_National_Park.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hummingbird in Cotopaxi National Park, Ecuador --Bgag 00:03, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Not nearly sharp enough. Charlesjsharp 22:16, 19 April 2016 (UTC) Comment
    •  Comment I would like to have more opinions. --Bgag 13:58, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose sorry, I'll have to agree with Charles: Level of detail is below average, imho. --El Grafo 13:44, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 19:52, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Stadthafen Recklinghausen Kran.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination crane at city port of Recklinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia , Germany. --Nordenfan 10:43, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • {{s}} Good quality. --Hubertl 13:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
    It was my fault, I assessed it not carefully enough. --Hubertl 06:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Stitching errors (see notes). --Tsungam 13:55, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done problems fixed --Nordenfan 16:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Still stitching errors (see additional note). --XRay 15:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  I withdraw my nomination --Nordenfan 19:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 06:24, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Ford Modell A, Bj. 1929 (6730 r2).JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Ford Model A from 1929 at a car park in Neuwied Spurzem 18:47, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:05, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too soft, probably focus problems - a parking car will not runaway and can be easily photographed more carefully --A.Savin 22:40, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Somewhat distracting background and some overexposed reflections. Sharpness not overwhelming, but absolutely acceptable in 100% view. --Smial 07:49, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Tilted to the right, lack of sharpness, distracting background. Hendric Stattmann 12:36, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
@Hendric Stattmann: Please compare with the QI of a truck. And what is tilted please? -- Spurzem 16:50, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support it´s ok for me. I don´t think that´s tilted. It could be the traffic sign too. --Hubertl 18:31, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 15:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC).
  •  Support It's good enough for QI. Ram-Man 01:32, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 06:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Turquoise-fronted_amazon_(Amazona_aestiva)_older_adult.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Turquoise-fronted amazon (Amazona aestiva), mature adult, the Pantanal, Brazil --Charlesjsharp 14:07, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support --Christian Ferrer 16:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but I think that image is posterized and has JPEG artifacts. --Halavar 18:40, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As for Halavar. Also chroma noise. -- Smial 08:33, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This seems to be a heavy crop (3 out of 20MPix). While this is not a problem per se, the lack of detail and the presence of chroma noise is problematic. Hendric Stattmann 12:39, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good composition, good colors, good sharpness -- Spurzem 21:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 06:26, 23 April 2016 (UTC)