Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 05 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:RAB2022_BotticelliBaby-33.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Botticelli Baby at Rocken am Brocken 2022. By User:Chris W. Braunschweiger --Achim Raschka 09:28, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Resolution is to small IMHO, not a QI to me --Poco a poco 17:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment Resolution is higher than 2MP following the rules for nomination - please discuss. --Achim Raschka 10:27, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree with Poco --DXR 21:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:07, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

File:2023_TP-Link_Archer_T5E_AC1200_(1).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination TP-Link Archer T5E AC1200 1 --Jacek Halicki 01:05, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Unfortunately most parts of the mushrooms out of focus, sorry. --Imehling 08:59, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Let's discuss about “focus” ː) --Mister rf 14:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support I have edited the wrong nomination. This one is ok of course. I'm really sorry. --Imehling 05:05, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:06, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

File:La_Casa_del_Rey,_Grand-Place,_Bruselas,_Bélgica,_2021-12-15,_DD_13.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Breadhouse, Grand-Place, Brussels, Belgium --Poco a poco 17:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Imehling 18:21, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think the perspective correction was too intense here. Resulting in an unrealistic reproduction of the proportions. --Augustgeyler 22:05, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO realistic enough --Michielverbeek 07:17, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:06, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

File:RAB2022_BotticelliBaby-1.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Botticelli Baby at Rocken am Brocken 2022. By User:Chris W. Braunschweiger --Achim Raschka 09:28, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Tilted + too low resolution IMHO --Poco a poco 17:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment It is 2MP+ and such strong tilt looks like it was done on purpose. For dynamic scenes like concerts or sport I think it should be acceptable. --LexKurochkin 06:20, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
      • Yes, over 2 MPx but still no detail here. And I do understand that a fish or a bird have to be captured from far away and a big crop could be necessary, but not in cases like this one. The 2 MPx was confirmed your such cases, sorry, but I expect more in 2023 for a day shot, specially detail --Poco a poco 17:58, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose With Poco a poco. --Augustgeyler 18:18, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Question So, we might not see the nose hair of the protagonist, but what's about printing this in A4? Would the quality be sufficient? For me it would be hard to say, without seeing this on a sheet of paper.--Der Angemeldete 12:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Gewone beurszwam (Volvopluteus gloiocephalus). 31-10-2022. (actm.) 05.jpg[edit]

  • ✓ Done This photo has since been renamed.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:42, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

 Support All problems identified and eliminated. The mushroom can be picked now.--Der Angemeldete 08:29, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:23, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Vote stricken. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:41, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, there are bad image artifacts in the background, the mushroom is only in focus around the edge, and there is a lot of noise. I don't think this is a QI. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Noise Reduction e.d. Thank you for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:06, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk)