Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006-1- 3.jpg

File:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006-1- 3.jpg (delist)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 14:37:33

•  Info Two is too much (Original nomination)
•  Info Delisting nominated by Claus. --Laitche (talk) 19:45, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006-1- 3.jpg, Left

•  Keep -- Claus 14:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment @Claus Obana and Diliff: I made the sections and moved your vote. If my decision is wrong, please move your vote or all revert what I did. --Laitche (talk) 16:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Delist this one as well. There's a clear patch on the left wall column/ceiling from fixing of the stitching issue in the original (right) image. -- KTC (talk) 23:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Huh? But instead of just delisting, it could be fixed, either by myself or someone else... No need to delist an image over a very minor stitching issue. Diliff (talk) 17:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Also, could you point out what exactly you mean? The left wall/column looks pretty clean IMO. I don't think even a pixel-peeper would notice any problems with the column unless directly comparing to the version with the stitching problem. Is that really how we should be judging images? Diliff (talk) 17:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
      • It's not a case of minor mis-alignment. There is that, but more importantly, the sharpness is completely different as if the patch was blurred before being applied. I will of course withdraw my vote if that was fixed. (I have added an image note to the iamge) -- KTC (talk) 20:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
        • I know what you mean but sorry, I think you may be too picky to delist :) --Laitche (talk) 21:20, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
        • I agree with Laitche, I think you were being a bit picky, but I've uploaded a new version which I think is an improvement. I don't have the original files to re-stitch anymore, so I had to use the clone tool as best I could. It's up in the top corner, not many people would notice it unless they were really looking for faults. Diliff (talk) 22:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
          • I accept that may well be the case, but since I did notice it, I couldn't ignore it. Either way, thanks, and I've struck my delist vote. -- KTC (talk) 12:05, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
            • I think we all notice minor faults or things that could have been done better but they don't all result in opposes or delist votes. ;-) Also, we don't usually delist an existing historic FP unless there's a really good reason (like a duplicate, or a serious fault that was missed at the time it became a FP). But anyway, thanks for striking it. Diliff (talk) 12:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Keep. — Julian H.^✈ 20:38, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Keep. --Laitche (talk) 21:20, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Keep. Diliff (talk) 22:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006.jpg, Right

•  Delist . Agree with you, I saw that there were two version recently and I wanted to do something about it but didn't get a chance. I support delisting of File:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006.jpg as it is a version with a slight stitching problem. File:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006-1- 3.jpg is the version which should be kept. Diliff (talk) 15:20, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Delist --Laitche (talk) 16:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment I added the image notes of stitching errors. --Laitche (talk) 16:58, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Delist — Julian H.^✈ 18:06, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Delist -- KTC (talk) 23:23, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Delist --Cayambe (talk) 06:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Delist --Tremonist (talk) 16:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Delist --Claus 03:56, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 7 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted.
Delisted alternative is File:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006.jpg --Laitche (talk) 16:57, 16 May 2015 (UTC)