Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Stained glass windows by Champigneulle in Notre-Dame de Sablé-sur-Sarthe

Stained glass windows by Champigneulle in Notre-Dame de Sablé-sur-Sarthe, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2013 at 14:43:50 (UTC)

• 
  Julian of Le Mans
• 
  Charles Borromeo
• 
  Francis of Assisi
• 
  Saint Cecilia
• 
  Clotilde
• 
  Saint Victoire

•  Info Set of six stained glass windows depicting six saints. Created by Charles Champigneulle's workshop in 1895 for the new Notre-Dame church in Sablé-sur-Sarthe, France. Uploaded & nominated by -- Selbymay (talk) 14:32, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Selbymay (talk) 14:32, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Till the concerns on set nominations is fixed. JKadavoor Jee 15:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the reading but I don't find any relations to this peculiar nomination as Jebulon said. Maybe we'll have to wait for a new pope to close the discussion you mentioned (dead indeed), IMO not relevant here. :-) --Selbymay (talk) 07:24, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

I talked about concerns; not about the outcome of a discussion. Please read the opinions of King of Hearts, Poco a poco, Alvesgaspar , Alchemist-hp and Ö there. I have nothing to say about people who often rollback their opinions according to their needs. JKadavoor Jee 10:31, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Support There is no special "concern on set nominations", only a discussion. No reason to "freeze" promotions, set nominations are still acceptable. This nomination is valuable, and the quality deserves the FP status IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 21:11, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

• No big concerns. But according to current status, two successful FP sets (with six pictures in a set) lead the contributor to Commons:Meet our photographers (not a big issue). Further the value of each picture in a set compared to a single FP is questionable. There are more little concerns too. (I prefer a single FP nomination of the most preferred one in this set showing others under "other versions" till the "issues" are resolved (per Alchemist-hp.) JKadavoor Jee 03:49, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Very good work ! --JLPC (talk) 21:46, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support But the discussion about set nomination seems to be dead --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:24, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support I'm speechless. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁galaxies 12:22, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice and high EV.--ArildV (talk) 15:24, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 16:10, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Arcalino (talk) 18:25, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support  ■ MMXX ^talk 20:51, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 05:52, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment This too worth for a read. JKadavoor Jee 06:38, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support--Claus (talk) 15:32, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 10:57, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 21:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors