Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Shy Albatross with Mars bar

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2022 at 05:46:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Diomedeidae_(Albatross)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 05:46, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 05:46, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the set. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:58, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support A nice but regretful set. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:48, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per SHB2000 ! --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:30, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sad but impressive --Clément Bardot (talk) 09:03, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support though I would prefer the side view on its own. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:02, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:51, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support And Thanks for let the original noise in the image. It is important not to eliminate the noise that is information in the images (except logical extreme cases) --Wilfredor (talk) 18:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:10, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would support, but there are an awful lot of images in COM:Deletion requests every day for including copyrighted packaging. I'm afraid these photos will be nominated for deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Compare Category:Mars Bar: it's {{PD-textlogo}}. Regards --A.Savin 11:33, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a clear read on what is de minimis in what might be non-obvious situations. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:10, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See point #3 of the table "Copyrighted work X is identifiable, but is a small part of a larger work, so that the larger work cannot easily be shown without showing X. X is a part of the larger work, and its inclusion is unavoidable." => Considered "Very likely [OK] Ok" -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding me about that useful chart. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:21, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:07, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:35, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:20, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual fish :-) Basile Morin (talk) 14:12, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:34, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 16:14, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support I wish they could be less noisy, but it may have been unavoidable and it is not so bad that I could not support. Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:37, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gyrostat (talk) 12:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:31, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu