Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Kharkov Regiment

Kharkov Regiment, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2023 at 23:08:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

• 
  Uhlan (until 1882)
• 
  Dragoon (since 1882)

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated#Other
•  Info created by Vigor1972 - uploaded by Vigor1972 - nominated by Niklitov -- Niklitov (talk) 23:08, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Niklitov (talk) 23:08, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

* Neutral The design exhibits multiple inconsistencies and technical deficiencies. The hands of the knight, for instance, seem to have been created using raster instead of genuine vectorization, which starkly contrasts with other parts of the image. Furthermore, the color of the hands does not match that of the face, creating a visual disconnect. Upon close examination, one can identify issues with the vertices of the vectors, causing abrupt breaks in the image, compromising the design's fluidity. The style of the lines is not consistent throughout the piece, suggesting a lack of uniformity in the technique used. Some elements give the impression of being a mere vectorization done over a photograph, detracting from the design's authenticity. In certain areas, it appears that raster has been used on top of a photo, which could be confirmed if one had access to the original image for comparison. The strokes, in general, seem to have been executed without the necessary precision, affecting the overall design quality. A clear example of this is the hat of the knight on the right, which, due to an improper stroke, appears to be floating in the air, rather than sitting firmly on his head. --Wilfredor (talk) 02:06, 24 October 2023 (UTC) I preffer withdraw from participating in this section --Wilfredor (talk) 11:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

 Comment 1) This design is all vector images (.svg format). No raster images! 2) Yes, the hands are a different color from the face, since the hands are workers, this is an ordinary soldier, from the peasants. — Niklitov (talk) 19:08, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

 Info Vector outline drawing. Vigor1972 (talk) 19:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

 Done Added gloves, made a 2D image style. — Niklitov (talk) 20:51, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Support absolutely no idea of the accuracy so let's trust people who gave it the VI badge. A bit naive and simple execution (mostly on the horses) but proportions look good and that provides a good template for evolution in my view. Support because we don't see lot of these and it's more complicated than pressing a camera shutter in my view. - Benh (talk) 16:43, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not a valid set as two random uniforms chosen from different regiments. Inconsistent scale as presented. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

   Info O, sorry! This is the story of one Kharkov regiment! Here are the two most important numbers of this one regiment: 4 (until 1882) and 11 (since 1882). At different times he wore different numbers. Attention, the scale is the same! — Niklitov (talk) 18:19, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Support High-quality and competent drawings that fully comply with regulatory materials. Polygon v (talk) 20:51, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't know how to judge these for FP, but they are useful VIs. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 2 November 2023 (UTC)