Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Snow crystals.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
image:Snow crystals.png - featured[edit]
- Info created by (IMAGEAUTHOR) - uploaded by Brian0918 - nominated by 89.49.133.172
Support --89.49.133.172 18:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)anonyms can't vote, sorry Lycaon 19:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)- Support --Luc Viatour 19:00, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support--Thermos 19:21, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- Lycaon 19:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support --AngMoKio 21:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Neutral where does the color come from? norro 22:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC)- They are called "pseudo colours", are computer generated and are a standard technique used with SEM (scanning electron microscopy) images. Lycaon 09:40, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support, but pseudo colour should be mentioned in the image description norro 12:33, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- They are called "pseudo colours", are computer generated and are a standard technique used with SEM (scanning electron microscopy) images. Lycaon 09:40, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Ahh, one of them new color ess-eee-ehms.. --Dschwen 03:02, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support amazing --Jollyroger 10:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Artefacto 14:03, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- LadyofHats 18:29, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- Lerdsuwa 04:27, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - Good, but I've seen much better photos of snowflakes (not PD or free license, unfortunately) - MPF 18:03, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- I like it -- Boereck 08:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support beautiful. --Brandt Luke Zorntalk to me 04:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Great. Looks like plastic. --Ziga 22:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support Amazing Ceridwen 23:29, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Opposedespite the great combination of beauty and educational value (my main criteria) because for the latter there should be more info, especially about the colours. Despite norro asking for this two weeks ago, this info has stil not been added. DirkvdM 10:54, 9 August 2006 (UTC)- Explanation about those colours was already added on this page (and now even on the image page!!) two weeks ago... ?!? -- Lycaon 11:36, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- An explanation here is useless. This is a central media base for all the wiki projects, and they need the info on the image page (where it has now been added, probably due to my request). Yes, two weeks ago, by norro (27 July). Since the info is now there, I will change my vote. DirkvdM 17:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Be serious people. If the info is here and you don't see it over there, what stops you from adding it yourself, instead of complaining and voting negatively. It's beyond me ....???! Lycaon 19:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- My mistake. I'm new here and regarded the photo pages as a bit too 'personal' (sort of like user pages). I'll mend my ways. :) DirkvdM 12:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Be serious people. If the info is here and you don't see it over there, what stops you from adding it yourself, instead of complaining and voting negatively. It's beyond me ....???! Lycaon 19:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- An explanation here is useless. This is a central media base for all the wiki projects, and they need the info on the image page (where it has now been added, probably due to my request). Yes, two weeks ago, by norro (27 July). Since the info is now there, I will change my vote. DirkvdM 17:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support now that the info has been added. DirkvdM 17:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support Ss181292 20:46, 9 August 2006 (UTC) -- high educational value
Support Wmeinhart 10:35, 12 August 2006 (UTC)After 11th August deadline -- Colin (talk) 17:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
16 support, 1 oppose → featured Roger McLassus 10:03, 23 August 2006 (UTC)