Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Shag Phalacrocorax aristotelis.jpg

Image:Shag Phalacrocorax aristotelis.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2011 at 16:11:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/Image:Shag Phalacrocorax aristotelis.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Shag Phalacrocorax aristotelis.jpg

•  Info created by Merops - uploaded by Merops - nominated by Merops -- Merops (talk) 16:11, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Merops (talk) 16:11, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Support Too noisy. With just enough softening to remove most of the noise, I would support. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:21, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

•  Info Noise was reduced. Merops (talk) 21:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

• Yes, that is an improvement. But one thing I didn't notice before is the blurring on the rocks at the bottom. What is this? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:14, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

•  Support --Jovian Eye _talk 01:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support —stay (sic)! 06:23, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose What is the bird looking at? It mortifies me not to know, the bird makes me think that what it is looking at is much more important than itself, the subject of this picture. Composition could have been much better, imagine this picture in landscape orientation with the subject at far right and the remaining space filled with the blurred background, it wouldn't still show what it is looking at, but definitely would have been a much better and pleasing composition. (Gussisaurio (talk) 18:55, 13 July 2011 (UTC))

 Oppose Low quality and nothing exceptional --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:28, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:22, 20 July 2011 (UTC)