Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Nagasaki 1945 - Before and after (adjusted).jpg

Image:Nagasaki 1945 - Before and after.jpg, withdrawn and Image:Nagasaki 1945 - Before and after (adjusted).jpg, featured

•  Info Nagasaki, Japan, before and after the atomic bombing of August 9, 1945. U.S. National Archive RG 77-MDH
  

Uploaded by Fastfission. Nominated by El Comandante 20:06, 21 May 2006 (UTC), for the high interest and emotion of this picture, even if the resolution isn't incredibly high.

•  Support --El Comandante 20:06, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Gryffindor 21:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral - Nice, but res.. Minto 01:59, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Resolution is too little. I'm sure there is a better version somewhere. --Keeleysam 02:59, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral  Support Nice, but res --Luc Viatour 06:50, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support fantastic historical document, if we could find (or recreate) a higher-res version that would be awesome. pfctdayelise (translate?) 08:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral Ss181292 16:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC) I see no point in featuring such images. I believe, this picture is well known anyway... and I strongly oppose to recreating such picture -- to dropping another nuclear bomb anywhere.
  • If I'd have to chose only one interest in featuring this image, it would be to NOT FORGET what war can do, even (or especially?) made by occidental countries that autoproclaim themselves defenders of the Human Rights... El Comandante 17:51, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support - agree with pfctdayelise - MPF 17:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose agree with Ss181292 --gildemax 21:32, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support - Featured pictures should be more than just pretty sunsets and cute animals. Gnangarra 06:12, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support an important thing to see --che 02:04, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support and it's aa small bomb compare to the recent ones —Gwir 06:51, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 08:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Prevert^(talk) 23:04, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose there are some technical problems: pictures are not the same zoom-level/resolution, which is important if you want to compare two pictures (which is obviously the intention here), there are several numbers on it without any explanation (units) and it's low res (which would be ok given it's age). It has a good encyclopedic value though. --Gorgo 23:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

• I thought the same, but I didn't change the zoom of the first image to avoid decreasing the resolution or having a too grainy photo. And I don't think the information about the unit used must be included in the picture. El Comandante 19:44, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

•  Oppose Urban 06:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose left one. ACK Gorgo  Neutral regarding to the edit. norro 09:26, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Result: 10 support, 5 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured (withdrawn) Mglanznig 21:49, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

• New proposition. I don't know what are the rules for featured pictures candidates, but I would like to propose this adjusted version, rotated and scaled (on the right). El Comandante 20:39, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support -- Anatol 22:06, 27 May 2006
•  Support --Jonathaneo 12:04, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Joonasl 16:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Freedom to share 15:40, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --AngMoKio 09:41, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Result: 5 support => featured Mglanznig 21:49, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Voting results: 15  Support, 3  Neutral and 4  Oppose = featured. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 02:11, 8 June 2006 (UTC) Changed the result because first version was withdrawn by the nominator. --Mglanznig 21:49, 12 June 2006 (UTC)