Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Frozen droplet.jpg

Image:Frozen droplet.jpg - not featured

•  Info Self nom -- Thegreenj 17:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Thegreenj 17:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm afraid that there's depth-of-field issues (most of the leaf, and even the back parts of the ice aren't in focus, for instance) and the crop removes too much of the leaf, leaving the image without enough context (in my opinion). I'd prefer an image that showed a bit more. Adam Cuerden 17:18, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Just as a note: at this magnification, getting the entire leaf in focus in a single shot is impossible. By the time that any significant DOF gains are made, diffraction will just soften out any extra detail. Thegreenj 17:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Sorry, Adam, but I'll have to disagree here. Yes, the leaf is out of focus, but it is not the subject of the image imo. What this image is is an illustration of a frozen water droplet and I feel that the author has done a very good job with this. Freedom to share 18:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  • I disagree on the wow. But maybe that's because I live in the UK and snow here happens once a year :) Freedom to share 22:44, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose It is a frozen water droplet. Quite well done, but no wow. Lycaon 20:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Good work. --Karelj 21:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose I like the background, but the water droplet needs to be more interesting and more crisp for FP (I took a shot at one but the composition didn't come out too well). --Dori - Talk 22:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful! --Beyond silence 23:30, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support - enough "wow" for me. --- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 09:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose For the reasons given by Adam Cuerden. --MichaelMaggs 09:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support. Agree with Freedom to share, and also that there's enough "wow", if you will. James F. (talk) 12:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Quote Adam Cuerden. WinSocket 17:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

 6 support, 5 oppose >> not featured -- Alvesgaspar 14:49, 19 March 2008 (UTC)