Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wolfram evaporated crystals and 1cm3 cube.jpg

File:Wolfram evaporated crystals and 1cm3 cube.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2010 at 12:47:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Wolfram evaporated crystals and 1cm3 cube.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wolfram evaporated crystals and 1cm3 cube.jpg

2865

1384

159

189

5472

2988

This crystal tip seems to have a lighter "halo" around it.

•  Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:47, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:47, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Info the cube isn't dirty or with fingerprints. You see the macrocrystalline structures. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:47, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral for now. Composition-wise this is even better than the Molybdenum picture, but it looks like the focus stacking didn't work out quite as well: I see several parts that look slightly unsharp, and in one place there's a weird "halo" around the crystal. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 17:53, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
  • The "halo" around the crystal is corrected. A derivate work with one small step more sharpeness is new uploaded: Tungsten (new). Do you prefer it? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:57, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:43, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- smial (talk) 21:56, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral Would give my support, but I prefer your sharper alternative :-) -- Ra'ike T C 10:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

  The sharper alternative is for me only an artificially alternative, not a reality. It is simple for everybody to sharpen it if needed. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:23, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

  It's more than only an artificially alternative. The higher sharpness emphasizes each detail somewhat more better and shows each elevation, every "crystel crumb" still more vividly. greetings -- Ra'ike T C 11:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Another excellent picture of a chemical element. --Tintero (talk) 18:20, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Steindy (talk) 23:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support The other one looks a bit oversharpened to me. --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Brackenheim (talk) 16:40, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:24, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:28, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 18:04, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--Elekhh (talk) 04:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /ianaré (talk) 04:50, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects