Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wildfire in Yellowstone Natinal Park produces Pyrocumulus clouds1.jpg

File:Wildfire in Yellowstone Natinal Park produces Pyrocumulus clouds1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2009 at 23:27:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Wildfire in Yellowstone Natinal Park produces Pyrocumulus clouds1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wildfire in Yellowstone Natinal Park produces Pyrocumulus clouds1.jpg

•  Info everything by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 23:27, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 23:27, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, --Vprisivko (talk) 09:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Yann (talk) 18:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Very neat. I really like the clouds. Tiptoety ^talk 19:22, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- MJJR (talk) 20:55, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Question Hasn't this been nominated (and declined) before? -- H005 21:28, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

You have a good memory! A different version was nominated and declined here. I ajusted the colors a litlle bit now. I did not want to upload over the other file because it was nominated (not by me) and declined on English wikipedia too here. I decided, that, if somebody liked the image enough to nominate it on Eglish Wikipedia FP, I'd better keep that version too :) Thanks for fixing my spelling :)--Mbz1 (talk) 21:41, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment There's a typo in the file name that should be fixed. -- H005 21:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry to spoil the show again but I still think (as in the previous nomination) that this photo does not show reality due to over-post-processing. --AngMoKio (talk) 11:58, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

I've seen many wildfires, but only once pyrocumulus clouds. I believe you are much luckier than I am. You've seen lots of them, and know quite well how they look in reality :)--Mbz1 (talk) 12:16, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

So far I have seen smoke of wildfires in California (in 2007) and South East Asia. But that is not the reason why I oppose. The reason why I oppose is because i know how clouds look that were "dramatized" with Photoshop. You obviously reduced it a bit since your last nomination...but it is for me still more than obvious. Furthermore this is sth you do with a lot of your pictures, which I regret bcs you don't just falsify reality but you make a good picture bad. I might give a pro to this picture if you would upload it without the post-processing. --AngMoKio (talk) 15:15, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Support --Aqwis (talk) 19:51, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 13:30, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 22:56, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Quality problems in the sky, looks like posterization from overprocessing. --S23678 (talk) 01:27, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Berthold Werner (talk) 15:32, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena