Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista desde la torre de observación, Parque Estatal Brown County, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-14, DD 07.jpg

File:Vista desde la torre de observación, Parque Estatal Brown County, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-14, DD 07.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2012 at 18:58:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vista desde la torre de observación, Parque Estatal Brown County, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-14, DD 07.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista desde la torre de observación, Parque Estatal Brown County, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-14, DD 07.jpg

•  Info Landscape view thru the observation tower, Brown County State Park, Indiana, USA. All by me, Poco a poco (talk) 18:58, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:58, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support FP to me. The nice autumn colors and the unusual perspective together make it special. - A.Savin 11:03, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Very unusual. Good colours. -- JDP90 (talk) 14:50, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Looks like a 3-panel abstract painting. --Selbymay (talk) 14:54, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Cool perspective and nice colors! Michael Barera (talk) 21:09, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Looks like a part of a contact sheet for film photography users ! --JLPC (talk) 22:39, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support It is a good idea, and it is well done. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:07, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Yann (talk) 10:18, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Info --New version uploaded: color balanced (less blue) and converted to sRGB. Feel free to revert if you don't like the edit. Sting (talk) 16:08, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

  Looks good, thank you, Poco a poco (talk) 19:19, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Oppose nice idea but not that outstanding that I could overlook about the technical issues: pixels look very painted and unnatural --Wladyslaw (talk) 22:42, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
•  weak oppose: As Wladyslaw stated: nice idea, but no "Wow" for me. I cannot see the real value for Wikimedia projects. Probably you can make some clarification on this issue. What is the main motive? The parque, the observation tower, the colors or your artistic idea? --Tuxyso (talk) 08:56, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

  Well, when I nominate a picture here is following the well-known official criteria of Commons. My hope is also that the evaluation is based on it, otherwise we'd need to update that criteria to avoid confusion. I spent one day in the Brown County State Park (Indinana, USA) middle of October and I tried to transmit the most representative of that place at that time, and it was, without doubt, the Indian summer, with its explosion of colors. The frame is of course an "artistic" touch with the target to have a more original result. I was hoping that this would please the reviewers here at FPC. I also think that this picture can be used in articles like Autumn, Brown County State Park or Indian summer enriching them, although I would expect this kind of question rather at VIC. All the best, Poco a poco (talk) 10:38, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

  Probably my comment results partially from a misinterpretation of the sentence "Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. " of the guidelines on Commons:Featured_picture_candidates. But for me the photo is still not representative for general topics like "autumn" or "Indian summer" because of the dominant artistic touch. Art is a subjective matter, and your undoubtlessly great work evokes no "Wow" with me in contrast to the most other voters. And no (personal) "Wow" is (as I've learned here) a concern of FP. --Tuxyso (talk) 12:28, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Oppose The idea and the framing are simple and probably nice. But beyond that, I fail to find anything particularly interesting. --Dey.sandip (talk) 13:19, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose The black border and the projections of the sunshade beams (?) are very disturbing. The "landscape views" are not very attractive as other autumn pictures. JKadavoor Jee 16:16, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Neutral Great "wow," very artistic take on it. But I feel it is lacking in value. Convince me of any Wikimedia project that might reasonably use this (no, I can't see this in the Wikipedia article on "autumn"), and you'll have my support. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:07, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

  Ok, what about wikibooks:Basic Photography/Composition and the usage of physical elements to frame the pictures? Poco a poco (talk) 08:57, 27 November 2012 (UTC) PD: Anyhow, I think that I have understood the message. I will sort out my pictures before I upload them to avoid something that could be considered too creative.

  All right, that's a good one.  Support King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:32, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Oppose Lacking value and quality. --Vamps (talk) 08:31, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Good value and quality, special effect to me (some say "wow"), very good idea and composition. Result is featurable, IMO. I remember that for years, some of old sacred cows here ( †, R.I.P.) took time in explaining me why useful or not in Wikimedia projects was actually not a valid criterium to oppose in FPC, because "Commons" is not only a repository for Wikimedia bla bla bla... Times are changing --Jebulon (talk) 18:33, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Béria Lima ^msg 14:31, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Béria Lima ^msg 19:55, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural