Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Val de Funes cun la Odles d'auton Südtirol.jpg

File:Val de Funes cun la Odles d'auton Südtirol.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2019 at 19:24:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Val de Funes cun la Odles d'auton Südtirol.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Val de Funes cun la Odles d'auton Südtirol.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy
•  Info created & uploaded by Moroder - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 19:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment The contrail really has to be carefully edited out. Such trails are temporary so I don't think there are any ethical issues with removing them, and more than removing dust spots. This one is too distracting. -- Colin (talk) 21:16, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

 Comment I'm a fan of reality as it is. These includes (in the opposite to dust spots produced by the camera) people on squares, sheep on meadows, and here the crane above the house (also temporary) and the contrails in the sky. --Stepro (talk) 21:52, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment Moroder: Your statement "Feel free to use my photos, but please mention me as the author and send me a message." contradicts in the last part, in my opinion, the CC license. In addition, you require the version 3.0-de above, and below the version 4.0 of the license. You have to decide please. --Stepro (talk) 21:52, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Stepro, "mention me as author" is of course required by the licence. I take the "but please.... send me a message" to be a request rather than a requirement, so it doesn't contradict the licence. Another example, you may release your work under CC0, which waives all rights, and still request attribution and a notification. -- Colin (talk) 07:08, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice colors, would be better a little wider but nonetheless great shot. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:40, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:20, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support maybe per Colin. Du machst Dich um das Ladinische wirklich verdient, Wolfgang ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Looks surreal. --Podzemnik (talk) 07:10, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Eatcha (talk) 07:25, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Milseburg (talk) 12:38, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Matthias Süßen (talk) 13:02, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

* Oppose Sorry, but the license must be clear. In the author field it is 3.0-de, in the box below "license-header" it is 4.0. I will change my vote to support as soon as it is fixed. --Stepro (talk) 13:23, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment @Stepro: I'm not very familiar with licenses but I don't see any License 3.0-de in the author field. Couldn't I simply fix it deleting the "license-header"? Regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:40, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment I just found out, it's only in German language, but not in English. I will write you on your Talk page, here OK for me. --Stepro (talk) 17:45, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Support.--Vulphere 14:34, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I think it's a little bit too bright, but still a great quality photo. Cmao20 (talk) 17:33, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Stepro (talk) 17:45, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:47, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Boothsift 00:38, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:07, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:44, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Qualified support Not as sharp throughout as one would expect given the size, but just too stunning an image for that to be anywhere near enough to oppose. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support, and about the contrail: The part of the mountain that was clearcut is much more disfiguring, but it's real, and if that is being shown, I don't see a good reason to delete the contrail. That said, there are some dust spots that should be removed because they are not part of the picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:24, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 04:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 04:46, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 01:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy