Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Upper Yosemite fall with reflection 1.jpg

File:Upper Yosemite fall with reflection 1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2010 at 19:51:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Upper Yosemite fall with reflection 1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Upper Yosemite fall with reflection 1.jpg

3185

2430

214

264

3777

4735

This tree looks horizontally cut between a sharp photo and a soft photo in full resolution. Actually, this whole area of the photo has some peculiar differences in sharpness, which I presume is due to the stitching. Not a big deal, just an observation, and if it is fixable it could attended to in the strive for perfection. --Slaunger (talk) 20:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Info everything by Mbz1-- Mbz1 (talk) 19:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 19:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Jebulon (talk) 20:17, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

@Slaunger, I see what you talking about. Please give me some time to check with originals and to fix if necessary. --Mbz1 (talk) 20:33, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Deal. --Slaunger (talk) 21:28, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Neutral Excellent composition, but can't support until errors are fixed. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:55, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Info the error was fixed. Slaunger, I am afraid the note you added is gone. It happens because every time I have to fix something I work with the original psd format panorama, and then, when I crop it, it has a slightly different crop. So here for the convince is the version you reviewed and found error.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:48, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

  Yeah I know the annotations gets mixed up when the pixel size changes, so no problem. The "cut" tree has improved. There are still some oddities concerning softness in the same region. I guess it is due to stitching between two photos having quite different focal distances, but it is really not a big deal nor a showstopper for me. --Slaunger (talk) 06:15, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

  I had a look at the geocode. Are you sure it is correct? I cannot locate the water body in the front of the photo? Is that because it is a seasonal lake, which just is not there in the satelite photos? I am also a bit confused as to the direction you are looking in? I recommend clarifying that by adding a heading to the geocode. If it is a seasonal body of water it is perhaps worthwhile to elaborate a little on the file page description. That reminds me: Do you know the Geolocator tool. I only realized how cool and easy to work with that is recently. With a few clicks you get a complete {{Location}} template including heading, size of the area etc., really cool and easy to use.

  Finally, I realize the photos metadata are lost in the stitching process. Could you add some details about equipment, number of photos used, other general conditions on the file page as a substitute for the missing EXIF? It adds value and informative content. --Slaunger (talk) 06:15, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Done--Mbz1 (talk) 14:22, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

   Support Thanks. I added an approximate heading. Please refine it if you know better. Very nice photo. --Slaunger (talk) 14:54, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Since fixed. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:25, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:59, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support nice --George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:45, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment--I fail to see how this image complies with point 5. Grinatyou (talk) 11:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

May I please ask you what point 5 you have in mind? Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:27, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:22, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - very nice. --Avenue (talk) 14:58, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:56, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural