Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:UP EMD SD9043AC Joso Bridge, USA.jpg

File:UP EMD SD9043AC Joso Bridge, USA.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2013 at 00:45:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:UP EMD SD9043AC Joso Bridge, USA.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:UP EMD SD9043AC Joso Bridge, USA.jpg

•  Info created by Kabelleger - uploaded by Kabelleger - nominated by Alchemist-hp -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Superb Poco a poco (talk) 00:50, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support very nice Kruusamägi (talk) 01:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support :) nice moment --The Photographer (talk) 03:59, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Joydeep _Talk 05:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support —Bruce1ee^talk 05:47, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support nice! the cumulus clouds adds drama to the image :) --Cj.samson (talk) 05:48, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 07:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support--Telemaque MySon (talk) 09:26, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support In spite of some red and green CA between some cars.--Jebulon (talk) 11:26, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:38, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:30, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Best U.S. railroad pic I've seen nominated here in a while. Daniel Case (talk) 19:38, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Colin (talk) 21:25, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Suid-Afrikaanse (talk) 23:01, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Pretty much everything right about the shot --Dey.sandip (talk) 07:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely scene --Uberprutser (talk) 18:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support--Citron (talk) 18:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Neutral Impressive motif. I'm not sure, whether 1/500sec was required to catch a moving freight train. Instead f/8 should have better been f/1x, so that the blurred distant background (cf. end of train) would have been sharp. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 16:02, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
  •  Comment This is not a depth of field issue (distant objects are sharp in the center of the image). However, the lens was at its widest setting (17mm), and while it is a decent lens overall (EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS USM) it does have some imperfections. I don't think stopping it down even more would have helped much. @1/500: Maybe something like 1/250 might have sufficed, but since a blurry train looks really bad and many pictures (like this one) cannot easily be repeated I usually prefer to be on the safe side. --Kabelleger (talk) 21:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your comment. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 18:26, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support--Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:19, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:35, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Simply stunning! Michael Barera (talk) 02:55, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Great! --Moonik (talk) 15:20, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Béria Lima ^msg 12:48, 8 January 2013 (UTC))

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles