Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Teddy-Express.jpg

File:Teddy-Express.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2018 at 15:25:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Teddy-Express.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Teddy-Express.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 15:25, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 15:25, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Question Absolutely charming :), but is there any chance of getting just a little bit more frame at the top? Just enough to get the top left little train signal not cut. I think that would also balance the photo better because of the empty space at the bottom between the tracks. Thoughts? --Cart (talk) 16:12, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Done --Llez (talk) 22:02, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Great, thanks. With the amount of guys here on this forum, I'm surprised we don't have any FP's of model trains (AFAICS). Think of the challenge to make it appear like a real train in a Kabelleger-esque photo. --Cart (talk) 22:47, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:49, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Tozina (talk) 18:29, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Reluctant oppose Yes, it would be very nice to have more model-train pics, and all the stuffed animals make this one irresistibly cute, but ... there's so many discordant diagonals in the image that it takes FP out of consideration for me. Daniel Case (talk) 18:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 10:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:45, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Not sure about the copyright status of this picture. --A.Savin 13:52, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think it corresponds to the FoP in Germany (permanent and accessible by the public); concerning the original: it was built 1942, i.e. 76 years ago. --Llez (talk) 15:43, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

  I don't know this place, but seems rather a movable object to me. This may disqualify it for being permanent in the sense of FoP laws. --A.Savin 02:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

  A train is a movable object per se. I this case all cars, trains, plans and so on can't be photographed by this reason --Llez (talk) 06:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

• But this is a minature, isn't it? In which case, aren't we talking about an exhibit in a permanent location, such as in a museum?--Peulle (talk) 07:23, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --The NMI User (talk) 06:26, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 11:01, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose bad composition --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 11:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing extra, I do not see reason for nomination. --Karelj (talk) 10:34, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:01, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects