Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Storebæltsforbindelsen højbroen.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Storebæltsforbindelsen højbroen.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2015 at 18:36:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
- Info all by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 18:36, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 18:36, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support Yes the composition work,the subject is clear and interesting --LivioAndronico (talk) 19:12, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:35, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose The lighting just isn't very exciting for me. I also feel there could be more of the rocks down below. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:51, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Pudelek (talk) 12:48, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 19:10, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:22, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per King, sorry. Competent shot and useful, but the light doesn't allow for much wow. --DXR (talk) 14:17, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sufficiently wowed, and I'm not sure the light's all of that. Maybe it's the pale sky that doesn't offset the earth tones of the rock enough. Maybe it's the composition that seems not to be able to distinguish between bridge and rocks as the subject of the image. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. -- Colin (talk) 17:14, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support Rainbow unicorn (talk) 19:49, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose I think for this composition to really work, the central part of the bridge would have to be closer. Also per others. — Julian H.✈ 16:04, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Christian Ferrer 05:12, 29 July 2015 (UTC)